Texas poised to pass 'Sanctuary City' ban with jail penalty
Moderators: carlson1, Charles L. Cotton
-
Topic author - Senior Member
- Posts in topic: 1
- Posts: 2717
- Joined: Mon Dec 21, 2015 12:22 pm
Texas poised to pass 'Sanctuary City' ban with jail penalty
"Texas Republicans were poised Wednesday to take a big step toward banning "sanctuary cities" in their state, debating a bill through which police chiefs and sheriffs could even be jailed for not cooperating fully with federal immigration authorities."
Very nice.
http://hosted.ap.org/dynamic/stories/U/ ... 6-17-31-14
Very nice.
http://hosted.ap.org/dynamic/stories/U/ ... 6-17-31-14
-
- Senior Member
- Posts in topic: 3
- Posts: 647
- Joined: Tue Jan 17, 2017 7:12 pm
Re: Texas poised to pass 'Sanctuary City' ban with jail penalty
Maybe they can share a cell with the people posting 30.06 signs on government property.
This is my opinion. There are many like it, but this one is mine.
-
- Senior Member
- Posts in topic: 1
- Posts: 1436
- Joined: Tue Feb 12, 2008 4:31 pm
- Location: SW Fort Worth
Re: Texas poised to pass 'Sanctuary City' ban with jail penalty
You have got my vote for that.ninjabread wrote:Maybe they can share a cell with the people posting 30.06 signs on government property.
"The trouble with our liberal friends is not that they're ignorant, it's just that they know so much that isn't so." - Ronald Reagan, 1964
30.06 signs only make criminals and terrorists safer.
NRA, LTC, School Safety, Armed Security, & Body Guard Instructor
30.06 signs only make criminals and terrorists safer.
NRA, LTC, School Safety, Armed Security, & Body Guard Instructor
-
- Senior Member
- Posts in topic: 1
- Posts: 2115
- Joined: Mon Nov 19, 2007 5:24 pm
- Location: Marshall
Re: Texas poised to pass 'Sanctuary City' ban with jail penalty
The problem is, someone will appeal the law, and some liberal judge will rule that it infringes on freedom of speech, etc....
NRA lifetime member
-
- Banned
- Posts in topic: 1
- Posts: 1999
- Joined: Sun Mar 22, 2015 4:21 pm
- Location: North Texas
Re: Texas poised to pass 'Sanctuary City' ban with jail penalty
I see a possible issue coming up on the 4th amendment. Asking for identification on a simple detention without an arrest/probable cause could be construed as a violation of your 4th amendment right.KC5AV wrote:The problem is, someone will appeal the law, and some liberal judge will rule that it infringes on freedom of speech, etc....
The "arrest" verbiage was better, IMHO. Then again, as an LTC holder, if an LEO asks me for my ID for any reason, I'm expected to cough up my papers, so I don't really see a huge issue, but its not my opinion that matters. It's the judge's.
TSRA Member since 5/30/15; NRA Member since 10/31/14
-
- Senior Member
- Posts in topic: 2
- Posts: 3509
- Joined: Wed Dec 22, 2010 11:52 pm
- Location: Alvin
- Contact:
Re: Texas poised to pass 'Sanctuary City' ban with jail penalty
I thought you weren't required to carry id? if that's the case, this makes no sense. I haven't seen the Senate version of this, has anyone else?
~Tracy
Gun control is what you talk about when you don't want to talk about the truth ~ Colion Noir
Gun control is what you talk about when you don't want to talk about the truth ~ Colion Noir
Re: Texas poised to pass 'Sanctuary City' ban with jail penalty
You are only required to provide valid ID if you are under arrest.SewTexas wrote:I thought you weren't required to carry id? if that's the case, this makes no sense. I haven't seen the Senate version of this, has anyone else?
-
- Senior Member
- Posts in topic: 7
- Posts: 5072
- Joined: Sun Jun 26, 2005 1:04 am
- Location: DFW Area, TX
Re: Texas poised to pass 'Sanctuary City' ban with jail penalty
What if you don't have one? Is that an additional criminal charge?WTR wrote:You are only required to provide valid ID if you are under arrest.SewTexas wrote:I thought you weren't required to carry id? if that's the case, this makes no sense. I haven't seen the Senate version of this, has anyone else?
4/13/1996 Completed CHL Class, 4/16/1996 Fingerprints, Affidavits, and Application Mailed, 10/4/1996 Received CHL, renewed 1998, 2002, 2006, 2011, 2016...). "ATF... Uhhh...heh...heh....Alcohol, tobacco, and GUNS!! Cool!!!!"
-
- Senior Member
- Posts in topic: 2
- Posts: 5350
- Joined: Tue Jan 19, 2016 4:23 pm
- Location: Johnson County, Texas
Re: Texas poised to pass 'Sanctuary City' ban with jail penalty
WTR wrote:You are only required to provide valid ID if you are under arrest.SewTexas wrote:I thought you weren't required to carry id? if that's the case, this makes no sense. I haven't seen the Senate version of this, has anyone else?
Even then you are not required to carry or show a government issued ID. You are required to truthfully identify. In Texas it's called failure to identify, and can be added to any charge, if it is prove that you provided false identity. When I was a LEO, the county where I worked would add the six months on to whatever sentence you were given.
Take away the Second first, and the First is gone in a second
Re: Texas poised to pass 'Sanctuary City' ban with jail penalty
Be careful what you wish for. It wasn't very long ago that I was VERY happy to see sheriffs standing up to the feds and saying "I will NOT enforce any federal law which violates my constituent's 2nd amendment rights, and will defend their right to keep and bear arms".
I don't think you can cherry pick here - either you think its your sheriff's job to be involved in enforcing federal law, or you don't. I, for one, prefer to keep them separate.
I don't think you can cherry pick here - either you think its your sheriff's job to be involved in enforcing federal law, or you don't. I, for one, prefer to keep them separate.
-
- Senior Member
- Posts in topic: 7
- Posts: 5072
- Joined: Sun Jun 26, 2005 1:04 am
- Location: DFW Area, TX
Re: Texas poised to pass 'Sanctuary City' ban with jail penalty
May you remain silent?Jusme wrote:WTR wrote:You are only required to provide valid ID if you are under arrest.SewTexas wrote:I thought you weren't required to carry id? if that's the case, this makes no sense. I haven't seen the Senate version of this, has anyone else?
Even then you are not required to carry or show a government issued ID. You are required to truthfully identify. In Texas it's called failure to identify, and can be added to any charge, if it is prove that you provided false identity. When I was a LEO, the county where I worked would add the six months on to whatever sentence you were given.
4/13/1996 Completed CHL Class, 4/16/1996 Fingerprints, Affidavits, and Application Mailed, 10/4/1996 Received CHL, renewed 1998, 2002, 2006, 2011, 2016...). "ATF... Uhhh...heh...heh....Alcohol, tobacco, and GUNS!! Cool!!!!"
Re: Texas poised to pass 'Sanctuary City' ban with jail penalty
You can if you are not arrested.ScottDLS wrote:May you remain silent?Jusme wrote:WTR wrote:You are only required to provide valid ID if you are under arrest.SewTexas wrote:I thought you weren't required to carry id? if that's the case, this makes no sense. I haven't seen the Senate version of this, has anyone else?
Even then you are not required to carry or show a government issued ID. You are required to truthfully identify. In Texas it's called failure to identify, and can be added to any charge, if it is prove that you provided false identity. When I was a LEO, the county where I worked would add the six months on to whatever sentence you were given.
Re: Texas poised to pass 'Sanctuary City' ban with jail penalty
MojaveMan wrote:Be careful what you wish for. It wasn't very long ago that I was VERY happy to see sheriffs standing up to the feds and saying "I will NOT enforce any federal law which violates my constituent's 2nd amendment rights, and will defend their right to keep and bear arms".
I don't think you can cherry pick here - either you think its your sheriff's job to be involved in enforcing federal law, or you don't. I, for one, prefer to keep them separate.
They only determine immigration status if you are arrested ( not just stopped). Then you are reported to ICE if you are illegal.
-
- Senior Member
- Posts in topic: 2
- Posts: 3509
- Joined: Wed Dec 22, 2010 11:52 pm
- Location: Alvin
- Contact:
Re: Texas poised to pass 'Sanctuary City' ban with jail penalty
WTR wrote:MojaveMan wrote:Be careful what you wish for. It wasn't very long ago that I was VERY happy to see sheriffs standing up to the feds and saying "I will NOT enforce any federal law which violates my constituent's 2nd amendment rights, and will defend their right to keep and bear arms".
I don't think you can cherry pick here - either you think its your sheriff's job to be involved in enforcing federal law, or you don't. I, for one, prefer to keep them separate.
They only determine immigration status if you are arrested ( not just stopped). Then you are reported to ICE if you are illegal.
the bill that passed the house states that the may ask for immigration status if "detained"
~Tracy
Gun control is what you talk about when you don't want to talk about the truth ~ Colion Noir
Gun control is what you talk about when you don't want to talk about the truth ~ Colion Noir
-
- Senior Member
- Posts in topic: 7
- Posts: 5072
- Joined: Sun Jun 26, 2005 1:04 am
- Location: DFW Area, TX
Re: Texas poised to pass 'Sanctuary City' ban with jail penalty
Can you remain silent if you ARE arrested or do they just give you that Miranda warning for show?WTR wrote:You can if you are not arrested.ScottDLS wrote:May you remain silent?Jusme wrote:WTR wrote:You are only required to provide valid ID if you are under arrest.SewTexas wrote:I thought you weren't required to carry id? if that's the case, this makes no sense. I haven't seen the Senate version of this, has anyone else?
Even then you are not required to carry or show a government issued ID. You are required to truthfully identify. In Texas it's called failure to identify, and can be added to any charge, if it is prove that you provided false identity. When I was a LEO, the county where I worked would add the six months on to whatever sentence you were given.
4/13/1996 Completed CHL Class, 4/16/1996 Fingerprints, Affidavits, and Application Mailed, 10/4/1996 Received CHL, renewed 1998, 2002, 2006, 2011, 2016...). "ATF... Uhhh...heh...heh....Alcohol, tobacco, and GUNS!! Cool!!!!"