Page 1 of 2

51st State - hmmmm

Posted: Thu Apr 29, 2010 6:33 pm
by UncleBob
Did the democrats just make a play to get more power by adding a Latino only entity to our United States? Puerto Rico.

Make sure to read the whole article - very interesting read.

http://www.foxnews.com/politics/2010/04 ... d-measure/" onclick="window.open(this.href);return false;

Re: 51st State - hmmmm

Posted: Thu Apr 29, 2010 7:22 pm
by PSLOwner
That reminds me of an old Saturday Night Live routine with Gilda Radner.

Re: 51st State - hmmmm

Posted: Thu Apr 29, 2010 7:33 pm
by OldSchool
Generally, the situation seems to be that PR has kinda wanted to become a State for a good many years, but would likely lose much Federal transfer money with full statehood. Honestly, the current status is more lucrative. There's no real incentive to become a State.

Re: 51st State - hmmmm

Posted: Thu Apr 29, 2010 7:41 pm
by C-dub
But, if I understand it correctly, the choice they will be given will make statehood the lesser evil. Apparently, they have voted at least three times on this in the last 40 years and each time they have voted to keep it the way it is. However, if what I read today is correct their choices will be worded in such a way that statehood will be the best option.

Re: 51st State - hmmmm

Posted: Thu Apr 29, 2010 7:46 pm
by OldSchool
Could be. But this current government is getting really good at the gambit, "Look what I've got for you now!" Could this be tied to the tremendous need for new tax revenue sources?

Re: 51st State - hmmmm

Posted: Thu Apr 29, 2010 7:59 pm
by rbftfire
:smash: I think you just hit the nail on the head.

Re: 51st State - hmmmm

Posted: Thu Apr 29, 2010 9:32 pm
by SQLGeek
That was my thought as well after I read this part of the article:

"They do not pay federal income tax on income earned on the island."

Re: 51st State - hmmmm

Posted: Thu Apr 29, 2010 9:33 pm
by surprise_i'm_armed
We should not add a 51st state.

It will screw up the nice 50 star flag we have now.

With 51, we'd have to go with 3 rows of 17 stars each! :-)

SIA

Re: 51st State - hmmmm

Posted: Thu Apr 29, 2010 9:52 pm
by jack010203
surprise_i'm_armed wrote:We should not add a 51st state.

It will screw up the nice 50 star flag we have now.

With 51, we'd have to go with 3 rows of 17 stars each! :-)

SIA

Finally someone points out the real issue here :biggrinjester:

Re: 51st State - hmmmm

Posted: Thu Apr 29, 2010 10:25 pm
by OldSchool
surprise_i'm_armed wrote:We should not add a 51st state.

It will screw up the nice 50 star flag we have now.

With 51, we'd have to go with 3 rows of 17 stars each! :-)

SIA
Hey, prime numbers!!!! :hurry:

Re: 51st State - hmmmm

Posted: Thu Apr 29, 2010 10:29 pm
by surprise_i'm_armed
Prime numbers, yes.

Shall we get strive to achieve some "Fibonacci" number of states?

SIA

Re: 51st State - hmmmm

Posted: Thu Apr 29, 2010 10:37 pm
by OldSchool
surprise_i'm_armed wrote:Prime numbers, yes.

Shall we get strive to achieve some "Fibonacci" number of states?

SIA
Would we have enough territories and protectorates.... :headscratch

Re: 51st State - hmmmm

Posted: Thu Apr 29, 2010 11:32 pm
by UncleBob
I don't know how long this bill has been on the table - however I think it's funny that it happens during a time when we have Republicans on the bad side of the Hispanic vote (imo) and a real chance to change the look of Congress this fall. Would a 51st State change the picture this fall?

Re: 51st State - hmmmm

Posted: Thu Apr 29, 2010 11:44 pm
by chabouk
SQLGeek wrote:That was my thought as well after I read this part of the article:

"They do not pay federal income tax on income earned on the island."
They do, however, pay a huge whopping PR tax bill.

I'm for either statehood or independence, whichever they choose. I'm not for continuing things the way they are now, though.

Same for the Mariana Islands (NMI + Guam), and the rest as well.

Get in, or get out. I won't fret either way, and I certainly understand the attraction of independence (even though the "S-word" is a no-no here! :mrgreen: )

Re: 51st State - hmmmm

Posted: Fri Apr 30, 2010 9:30 am
by ddstuder
surprise_i'm_armed wrote:We should not add a 51st state.

It will screw up the nice 50 star flag we have now.

With 51, we'd have to go with 3 rows of 17 stars each! :-)

SIA

When Texas secedes, they can still have a pretty flag with 50 stars! :txflag: