Uh oh - the UN takes step 1 in the US...

As the name indicates, this is the place for gun-related political discussions. It is not open to other political topics.

Moderators: carlson1, Charles L. Cotton

User avatar

shortysboy09
Senior Member
Posts in topic: 1
Posts: 510
Joined: Thu Oct 29, 2009 9:51 am
Location: Mckinney, Tx.

Re: Uh oh - the UN takes step 1 in the US...

#1

Post by shortysboy09 »

So, how would the UN expect to get all the guns from US citizens? A lot of individual sales that went un-documented and can't be traced I wouldn't think.
Disclaimer for all my posts: IANAL

My setup:

Kimber Ultra Crimson Carry II or Bersa Thunder .380
Crossbreed Supertuck

NRA Member
TSRA Member
User avatar

kalipsocs
Senior Member
Posts in topic: 1
Posts: 434
Joined: Tue Jul 08, 2008 1:43 am

Re: Uh oh - the UN takes step 1 in the US...

#2

Post by kalipsocs »

AndyC wrote:
Warning about UN Plans for Gun Regulations
Wednesday, 28 April 2010 16:43

Firearms Industry Concerned Over United Nations Request for Firearms Trace Data

NEWTOWN, Conn. -- The National Shooting Sports Foundation (NSSF) - the trade association for the firearms industry - has learned that the United Nations has filed its first firearms trace request. The move by the United Nations, which has long advocated for civilian disarmament, raised concerns from the NSSF.
More here
I'd like to see them try.... Actually, I wouldn't but I think you get my drift. Not saying it couldn't happen, but I don't think it would be as easy as they sure would like it to be.

rbftfire
Member
Posts in topic: 1
Posts: 152
Joined: Wed Apr 21, 2010 9:42 am

Re: Uh oh - the UN takes step 1 in the US...

#3

Post by rbftfire »

:iagree: Exactly.

casingpoint
Senior Member
Posts in topic: 1
Posts: 1447
Joined: Sat Dec 09, 2006 9:53 pm

Re: Uh oh - the UN takes step 1 in the US...

#4

Post by casingpoint »

So what is the UN going to do with that trace information, store it on disc? Sell it to Mohammed?
User avatar

The Annoyed Man
Senior Member
Posts in topic: 1
Posts: 26850
Joined: Wed Jan 16, 2008 12:59 pm
Location: North Richland Hills, Texas
Contact:

Re: Uh oh - the UN takes step 1 in the US...

#5

Post by The Annoyed Man »

AndyC wrote:I'm not so much worried about them finding them as I am about them even being allowed to make the attempt in the first place.
I note that the article says the UN was refused the request and referred to the BATF for the information. Let's hope that the BATF has sense enough to tell the UN to go suck an egg.
“Hard times create strong men. Strong men create good times. Good times create weak men. And, weak men create hard times.”

― G. Michael Hopf, "Those Who Remain"

#TINVOWOOT

MechAg94
Senior Member
Posts in topic: 1
Posts: 1584
Joined: Tue Dec 09, 2008 10:28 pm

Re: Uh oh - the UN takes step 1 in the US...

#6

Post by MechAg94 »

In this particular case, the manufacturer declined to provide the information to the United Nations and instead advised UN officials to make its request through proper international law enforcement channels. This would ensure that ATF, the appropriate law enforcement entity responsible for handling such requests, would be aware of the world body's actions.
IMO, the UN making such a request is no different than the Boy Scouts doing it. They are not a law enforcement organization. I thought there are already avenues for law enforcement in other countries to make such requests to the US.
User avatar

PSLOwner
Member
Posts in topic: 1
Posts: 110
Joined: Sat Nov 28, 2009 11:13 am

Re: Uh oh - the UN takes step 1 in the US...

#7

Post by PSLOwner »

The Annoyed Man wrote:
AndyC wrote:I'm not so much worried about them finding them as I am about them even being allowed to make the attempt in the first place.
I note that the article says the UN was refused the request and referred to the BATF for the information. Let's hope that the BATF has sense enough to tell the UN to go suck an egg.
Agreed.

I am more puzzled why they even bothered with this in the first place. I think they have more pressing issues than this.
User avatar

SwimFan85
Senior Member
Posts in topic: 1
Posts: 243
Joined: Wed Feb 10, 2010 4:44 pm
Location: Between the Devil and the Deep Blue Sea

Re: Uh oh - the UN takes step 1 in the US...

#8

Post by SwimFan85 »

Morally and legally they should deny the request. However, the BATF falls under the executive branch.
Our chains are forged! Their clanking may be heard on the plains of Boston!
The war is inevitable--and let it come! I repeat it, sir, let it come.
User avatar

74novaman
Senior Member
Posts in topic: 1
Posts: 3798
Joined: Wed Feb 18, 2009 7:36 am
Location: CenTex

Re: Uh oh - the UN takes step 1 in the US...

#9

Post by 74novaman »

SwimFan85 wrote:Morally and legally they should deny the request. However, the BATF falls under the executive branch.
And has had little regard for laws or morals no matter which Executive they were serving at the time.
TANSTAAFL
User avatar

Sidro
Senior Member
Posts in topic: 1
Posts: 662
Joined: Mon Nov 02, 2009 9:52 pm

Re: Uh oh - the UN takes step 1 in the US...

#10

Post by Sidro »

Kind of reminds me of Red Dawn. If I planned to somehow takeover or overthrow a country it sure would be nice to know who has firearms. No, I am not a conspiracy nut. I just don't like the UN sticking their nose in our business. The original idea for the UN was great but through the years it has sure gone downhill. Now it is like the cart leading the horse.
User avatar

sjfcontrol
Senior Member
Posts in topic: 3
Posts: 6267
Joined: Wed Oct 28, 2009 7:14 am
Location: Flint, TX

Re: Uh oh - the UN takes step 1 in the US...

#11

Post by sjfcontrol »

OK -- that is a strange request. They (the UN) requested information about a specific pistol by serial number directly from the manufacturer. They were requesting:
1) name & address of the "entity" it was sold to.
2) a list of other weapons sold in the same consignment
3) any information regarding re-sale.

H&K would probably be ABLE (but not willing) to supply information regarding the wholesale distribution process, but would have no information regarding the ultimate retail purchaser (unless the purchaser sent in a warrantee card, or something). Neither H&K or BAFTA would necessarily have any info regarding re-sale.

BAFTE, on the other hand, might know the retail purchaser, but the 4473 forms are typically kept by the FFL (not sent to BAFTE unless the FFL closes business), and the NICS records are SUPPOSED to be destroyed after a short period of time.

I'm guessing the UN was attempting to see if a batch (consignment) of handguns from H&K was redirected somehow to this "Cote d'Ivoire" group. Anyway, seems like a fishing expedition to me.
:headscratch
Range Rule: "The front gate lock is not an acceptable target."
Never Forget. Image
User avatar

Ashlar
Member
Posts in topic: 2
Posts: 156
Joined: Sat Nov 21, 2009 9:48 pm
Location: Coppell, TX

Re: Uh oh - the UN takes step 1 in the US...

#12

Post by Ashlar »

This pistol showed up in Côte d'Ivoire, where there's been a long running civil war. The UN security council set up a 'Group of Experts' to monitor the situation.

If some third party is using guns bought here to fuel civil war there, I know I'd like to know about it. If there's a crooked FFL, or a straw purchaser, or even a covert government hand in this (CIA?) they need to stomp that PDQ.

Put the tinfoil hats back in the drawers, folks.
User avatar

sjfcontrol
Senior Member
Posts in topic: 3
Posts: 6267
Joined: Wed Oct 28, 2009 7:14 am
Location: Flint, TX

Re: Uh oh - the UN takes step 1 in the US...

#13

Post by sjfcontrol »

"A" single gun in a civil war, and they think it's a conspiracy? Who's wearing the tin foil hats now??? :evil2:
Range Rule: "The front gate lock is not an acceptable target."
Never Forget. Image
Post Reply

Return to “Gun and/or Self-Defense Related Political Issues”