The reality is that LEOs are the determiners for many people. They typically determine what the law is unless they're arresting someone of above-average means who can afford to defend him or herself.Robert*PPS wrote:Look, our justice system is such that LEOs are not the determiners of what is just. They are enforcers of just laws as determined by the people. If a LEO suspects that a crime has been committed, they detain and charge. The DA prosecutes those charges. A law may or may not have been broken, but our system calls for that to be proved in a court of law....not on the side of the road or anywhere else. Now, it may be determined in a court of law that no law was broken, or it may not even be prosecuted at all, but that doesn't necessarily mean that it was a bad arrest.
.
Many charges - such as disorderly conduct, public intoxication, or perhaps carrying concealed while intoxicated leave it largely up to officer discretion. The other side is that even if you can afford to defend against it, the act of an arrest itself is inherently punitive. The record of the arrest stays. You don't get your legal defense money back.
APD did the right thing here by asking them to leave.
They chose a court battle. They'll get one.