Tennessee Takes Leadership on Gun Free Zones

As the name indicates, this is the place for gun-related political discussions. It is not open to other political topics.

Moderators: carlson1, Charles L. Cotton

User avatar

TexasJohnBoy
Banned
Posts in topic: 1
Posts: 1999
Joined: Sun Mar 22, 2015 4:21 pm
Location: North Texas

Re: Tennessee Takes Leadership on Gun Free Zones

#31

Post by TexasJohnBoy »

I've thought about this over the past few days, and I think this would be a great thing to add to the books in TX. Put some weight on putting up a 30.06 sign from the other end.
TSRA Member since 5/30/15; NRA Member since 10/31/14

Scott Farkus
Senior Member
Posts in topic: 1
Posts: 410
Joined: Tue Jul 13, 2010 7:18 pm
Location: Austin

Re: Tennessee Takes Leadership on Gun Free Zones

#32

Post by Scott Farkus »

I'd rather revisit 30.06 in its entirety, but this seems like the next best thing. Let's do it!
User avatar

XinTX
Senior Member
Posts in topic: 2
Posts: 440
Joined: Fri Dec 17, 2010 2:27 pm
Location: League City

Re: Tennessee Takes Leadership on Gun Free Zones

#33

Post by XinTX »

Scott Farkus wrote:I'd rather revisit 30.06 in its entirety, but this seems like the next best thing. Let's do it!
This. I'd prefer to remove force of law for a 30.06 sign. But the business community will fight that. I'd rather eliminate a law rather than adding one. But, if the force of law can't be removed on 30.06, this would be my next choice. As has been said here, posting your business is akin to putting up a "wet floor" sign and taking no action to mitigate it after that. If a business posts AND takes some good faith effort to provide for the security of their customers, that's okay.

And it's true no one "forces" you to go into a place of business. But under our current system, businesses are considered "public accommodations". This will add some liability to businesses that post. But it would be fairly small. The incident rate of mass shootings is extremely low. Simple single shootings in the course of a robbery is higher. But in MOST communities, the likelihood is so low that the small level of added liability won't be a game changer. Especially for the insurers that encourage their clients to post.
“Public safety is always the first cry of the tyrant.” - Lord Gladstone
User avatar

Topic author
Excaliber
Moderator
Posts in topic: 3
Posts: 6198
Joined: Tue May 27, 2008 9:59 pm
Location: DFW Metro

Re: Tennessee Takes Leadership on Gun Free Zones

#34

Post by Excaliber »

XinTX wrote:
Scott Farkus wrote:I'd rather revisit 30.06 in its entirety, but this seems like the next best thing. Let's do it!
This. I'd prefer to remove force of law for a 30.06 sign. But the business community will fight that. I'd rather eliminate a law rather than adding one. But, if the force of law can't be removed on 30.06, this would be my next choice. As has been said here, posting your business is akin to putting up a "wet floor" sign and taking no action to mitigate it after that. If a business posts AND takes some good faith effort to provide for the security of their customers, that's okay.

And it's true no one "forces" you to go into a place of business. But under our current system, businesses are considered "public accommodations". This will add some liability to businesses that post. But it would be fairly small. The incident rate of mass shootings is extremely low. Simple single shootings in the course of a robbery is higher. But in MOST communities, the likelihood is so low that the small level of added liability won't be a game changer. Especially for the insurers that encourage their clients to post.
The Tennessee law doesn't limit liability to active shooter incidents only - it looks like it would apply to injuries sustained during an aggravated robbery, which is much more common.

Insurers work on probabilities of losses. Losses from not posting are nearly non-existent. Losses from robberies at convenience stores would be highly likely. The TN law is likely to be a game changer there.
Excaliber

"An unarmed man can only flee from evil, and evil is not overcome by fleeing from it." - Jeff Cooper
I am not a lawyer. Nothing in any of my posts should be construed as legal or professional advice.

NotRPB
Senior Member
Posts in topic: 1
Posts: 1356
Joined: Tue May 05, 2015 8:24 am

Re: Tennessee Takes Leadership on Gun Free Zones

#35

Post by NotRPB »

User avatar

XinTX
Senior Member
Posts in topic: 2
Posts: 440
Joined: Fri Dec 17, 2010 2:27 pm
Location: League City

Re: Tennessee Takes Leadership on Gun Free Zones

#36

Post by XinTX »

Excaliber wrote:
XinTX wrote:
Scott Farkus wrote:I'd rather revisit 30.06 in its entirety, but this seems like the next best thing. Let's do it!
But in MOST communities, the likelihood is so low that the small level of added liability won't be a game changer. Especially for the insurers that encourage their clients to post.
The Tennessee law doesn't limit liability to active shooter incidents only - it looks like it would apply to injuries sustained during an aggravated robbery, which is much more common.

Insurers work on probabilities of losses. Losses from not posting are nearly non-existent. Losses from robberies at convenience stores would be highly likely. The TN law is likely to be a game changer there.
True. But I said in MOST communities. And I wasn't thinking about aggravated robberies either. So I could see some signs at convenience stores coming down. Most in my area aren't posted. But I rarely use those any more so I haven't looked.

I don't fully agree with this law. But I see the principle. You can't just post a sign and absolve yourself of the consequences of having done so. You can't post a sing saying "We aren't responsible for damage due to XXXX" and then use that as cover to be careless in that area.
“Public safety is always the first cry of the tyrant.” - Lord Gladstone
Post Reply

Return to “Gun and/or Self-Defense Related Political Issues”