Tennessee Takes Leadership on Gun Free Zones
Moderators: carlson1, Charles L. Cotton
-
- Banned
- Posts in topic: 1
- Posts: 1999
- Joined: Sun Mar 22, 2015 4:21 pm
- Location: North Texas
Re: Tennessee Takes Leadership on Gun Free Zones
I've thought about this over the past few days, and I think this would be a great thing to add to the books in TX. Put some weight on putting up a 30.06 sign from the other end.
TSRA Member since 5/30/15; NRA Member since 10/31/14
-
- Senior Member
- Posts in topic: 1
- Posts: 410
- Joined: Tue Jul 13, 2010 7:18 pm
- Location: Austin
Re: Tennessee Takes Leadership on Gun Free Zones
I'd rather revisit 30.06 in its entirety, but this seems like the next best thing. Let's do it!
-
- Senior Member
- Posts in topic: 2
- Posts: 440
- Joined: Fri Dec 17, 2010 2:27 pm
- Location: League City
Re: Tennessee Takes Leadership on Gun Free Zones
This. I'd prefer to remove force of law for a 30.06 sign. But the business community will fight that. I'd rather eliminate a law rather than adding one. But, if the force of law can't be removed on 30.06, this would be my next choice. As has been said here, posting your business is akin to putting up a "wet floor" sign and taking no action to mitigate it after that. If a business posts AND takes some good faith effort to provide for the security of their customers, that's okay.Scott Farkus wrote:I'd rather revisit 30.06 in its entirety, but this seems like the next best thing. Let's do it!
And it's true no one "forces" you to go into a place of business. But under our current system, businesses are considered "public accommodations". This will add some liability to businesses that post. But it would be fairly small. The incident rate of mass shootings is extremely low. Simple single shootings in the course of a robbery is higher. But in MOST communities, the likelihood is so low that the small level of added liability won't be a game changer. Especially for the insurers that encourage their clients to post.
“Public safety is always the first cry of the tyrant.” - Lord Gladstone
-
Topic author - Moderator
- Posts in topic: 3
- Posts: 6198
- Joined: Tue May 27, 2008 9:59 pm
- Location: DFW Metro
Re: Tennessee Takes Leadership on Gun Free Zones
The Tennessee law doesn't limit liability to active shooter incidents only - it looks like it would apply to injuries sustained during an aggravated robbery, which is much more common.XinTX wrote:This. I'd prefer to remove force of law for a 30.06 sign. But the business community will fight that. I'd rather eliminate a law rather than adding one. But, if the force of law can't be removed on 30.06, this would be my next choice. As has been said here, posting your business is akin to putting up a "wet floor" sign and taking no action to mitigate it after that. If a business posts AND takes some good faith effort to provide for the security of their customers, that's okay.Scott Farkus wrote:I'd rather revisit 30.06 in its entirety, but this seems like the next best thing. Let's do it!
And it's true no one "forces" you to go into a place of business. But under our current system, businesses are considered "public accommodations". This will add some liability to businesses that post. But it would be fairly small. The incident rate of mass shootings is extremely low. Simple single shootings in the course of a robbery is higher. But in MOST communities, the likelihood is so low that the small level of added liability won't be a game changer. Especially for the insurers that encourage their clients to post.
Insurers work on probabilities of losses. Losses from not posting are nearly non-existent. Losses from robberies at convenience stores would be highly likely. The TN law is likely to be a game changer there.
Excaliber
"An unarmed man can only flee from evil, and evil is not overcome by fleeing from it." - Jeff Cooper
I am not a lawyer. Nothing in any of my posts should be construed as legal or professional advice.
"An unarmed man can only flee from evil, and evil is not overcome by fleeing from it." - Jeff Cooper
I am not a lawyer. Nothing in any of my posts should be construed as legal or professional advice.
Re: Tennessee Takes Leadership on Gun Free Zones
Fox News finally reported it
http://nation.foxnews.com/2016/07/04/gu ... ry-holders
http://nation.foxnews.com/2016/07/04/gu ... ry-holders
-
- Senior Member
- Posts in topic: 2
- Posts: 440
- Joined: Fri Dec 17, 2010 2:27 pm
- Location: League City
Re: Tennessee Takes Leadership on Gun Free Zones
True. But I said in MOST communities. And I wasn't thinking about aggravated robberies either. So I could see some signs at convenience stores coming down. Most in my area aren't posted. But I rarely use those any more so I haven't looked.Excaliber wrote:The Tennessee law doesn't limit liability to active shooter incidents only - it looks like it would apply to injuries sustained during an aggravated robbery, which is much more common.XinTX wrote:But in MOST communities, the likelihood is so low that the small level of added liability won't be a game changer. Especially for the insurers that encourage their clients to post.Scott Farkus wrote:I'd rather revisit 30.06 in its entirety, but this seems like the next best thing. Let's do it!
Insurers work on probabilities of losses. Losses from not posting are nearly non-existent. Losses from robberies at convenience stores would be highly likely. The TN law is likely to be a game changer there.
I don't fully agree with this law. But I see the principle. You can't just post a sign and absolve yourself of the consequences of having done so. You can't post a sing saying "We aren't responsible for damage due to XXXX" and then use that as cover to be careless in that area.
“Public safety is always the first cry of the tyrant.” - Lord Gladstone