Try what? Don't give general comments, please give specific details as to what would justify a recall.Strat9mm wrote:His refusal to even try.Charles L. Cotton wrote:Based upon what!?APynckel wrote:We need to recall Cornyn.
Chas.
Chas.
Moderators: carlson1, Charles L. Cotton
Try what? Don't give general comments, please give specific details as to what would justify a recall.Strat9mm wrote:His refusal to even try.Charles L. Cotton wrote:Based upon what!?APynckel wrote:We need to recall Cornyn.
Chas.
1) not asking his constituents their opinion on the matterCharles L. Cotton wrote:Try what? Don't give general comments, please give specific details as to what would justify a recall.Strat9mm wrote:His refusal to even try.Charles L. Cotton wrote:Based upon what!?APynckel wrote:We need to recall Cornyn.
Chas.
Chas.
There should always be a "final option" if the person you elected outright lied to you about their intentions.atticus wrote:I was not aware we have recall for U.S. senators in Texas. I, for one, don't believe in recalls. I think we make our best judgment at election time. Our next judgment, as voters, comes at the time of the next election. I think a no-recall system promotes good representative government - we elect people we believe will use their best judgment during their term. And then we allow them to exercise that judgment. If, as in Cornyn's case, it turns out that the elected representative takes a stand on one or more issues that is so bad we don't want that person in office any more, then we can have it out at the next election campaign. That being said, I believe Cornyn is up for re-election in 2014. He may well draw a primary opponent over this Obamacare issue.
Just as I thought, you can't give any specifics.APynckel wrote:1) not asking his constituents their opinion on the matterCharles L. Cotton wrote:Try what? Don't give general comments, please give specific details as to what would justify a recall.Strat9mm wrote:His refusal to even try.Charles L. Cotton wrote:Based upon what!?APynckel wrote:We need to recall Cornyn.
Chas.
Chas.
2) when they gave him their position, refusing to abide by them.
What lie did Cornyn tell?APynckel wrote:There should always be a "final option" if the person you elected outright lied to you about their intentions.atticus wrote:I was not aware we have recall for U.S. senators in Texas. I, for one, don't believe in recalls. I think we make our best judgment at election time. Our next judgment, as voters, comes at the time of the next election. I think a no-recall system promotes good representative government - we elect people we believe will use their best judgment during their term. And then we allow them to exercise that judgment. If, as in Cornyn's case, it turns out that the elected representative takes a stand on one or more issues that is so bad we don't want that person in office any more, then we can have it out at the next election campaign. That being said, I believe Cornyn is up for re-election in 2014. He may well draw a primary opponent over this Obamacare issue.
That he would vote to defund obamacare, then vote FOR cloture so that the dems would win, and he would get a political "no" vote on the final bill.......Charles L. Cotton wrote:What lie did Cornyn tell?APynckel wrote:There should always be a "final option" if the person you elected outright lied to you about their intentions.atticus wrote:I was not aware we have recall for U.S. senators in Texas. I, for one, don't believe in recalls. I think we make our best judgment at election time. Our next judgment, as voters, comes at the time of the next election. I think a no-recall system promotes good representative government - we elect people we believe will use their best judgment during their term. And then we allow them to exercise that judgment. If, as in Cornyn's case, it turns out that the elected representative takes a stand on one or more issues that is so bad we don't want that person in office any more, then we can have it out at the next election campaign. That being said, I believe Cornyn is up for re-election in 2014. He may well draw a primary opponent over this Obamacare issue.
Chas.
Please link to a post where Sen. Cornyn said he'd vote to defund Obamacase.APynckel wrote:That he would vote to defund obamacare, then vote FOR cloture so that the dems would win, and he would get a political "no" vote on the final bill.......Charles L. Cotton wrote:What lie did Cornyn tell?APynckel wrote:There should always be a "final option" if the person you elected outright lied to you about their intentions.atticus wrote:I was not aware we have recall for U.S. senators in Texas. I, for one, don't believe in recalls. I think we make our best judgment at election time. Our next judgment, as voters, comes at the time of the next election. I think a no-recall system promotes good representative government - we elect people we believe will use their best judgment during their term. And then we allow them to exercise that judgment. If, as in Cornyn's case, it turns out that the elected representative takes a stand on one or more issues that is so bad we don't want that person in office any more, then we can have it out at the next election campaign. That being said, I believe Cornyn is up for re-election in 2014. He may well draw a primary opponent over this Obamacare issue.
Chas.
You worry me chaz.
" onclick="window.open(this.href);return false;Charles L. Cotton wrote:Please link to a post where Sen. Cornyn said he'd vote to defund Obamacase.APynckel wrote:That he would vote to defund obamacare, then vote FOR cloture so that the dems would win, and he would get a political "no" vote on the final bill.......Charles L. Cotton wrote:What lie did Cornyn tell?APynckel wrote:There should always be a "final option" if the person you elected outright lied to you about their intentions.atticus wrote:I was not aware we have recall for U.S. senators in Texas. I, for one, don't believe in recalls. I think we make our best judgment at election time. Our next judgment, as voters, comes at the time of the next election. I think a no-recall system promotes good representative government - we elect people we believe will use their best judgment during their term. And then we allow them to exercise that judgment. If, as in Cornyn's case, it turns out that the elected representative takes a stand on one or more issues that is so bad we don't want that person in office any more, then we can have it out at the next election campaign. That being said, I believe Cornyn is up for re-election in 2014. He may well draw a primary opponent over this Obamacare issue.
Chas.
You worry me chaz.
Chas.
Not quite, now show me his vote to add funding back to the Senate bill.APynckel wrote:" onclick="window.open(this.href);return false;Charles L. Cotton wrote:Please link to a post where Sen. Cornyn said he'd vote to defund Obamacase.APynckel wrote:That he would vote to defund obamacare, then vote FOR cloture so that the dems would win, and he would get a political "no" vote on the final bill.......Charles L. Cotton wrote:What lie did Cornyn tell?APynckel wrote:There should always be a "final option" if the person you elected outright lied to you about their intentions.atticus wrote:I was not aware we have recall for U.S. senators in Texas. I, for one, don't believe in recalls. I think we make our best judgment at election time. Our next judgment, as voters, comes at the time of the next election. I think a no-recall system promotes good representative government - we elect people we believe will use their best judgment during their term. And then we allow them to exercise that judgment. If, as in Cornyn's case, it turns out that the elected representative takes a stand on one or more issues that is so bad we don't want that person in office any more, then we can have it out at the next election campaign. That being said, I believe Cornyn is up for re-election in 2014. He may well draw a primary opponent over this Obamacare issue.
Chas.
You worry me chaz.
Chas.
BOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOM
He voted FOR cloture.....Charles L. Cotton wrote:Not quite, now show me his vote to add funding back to the Senate bill.APynckel wrote:" onclick="window.open(this.href);return false;Charles L. Cotton wrote:Please link to a post where Sen. Cornyn said he'd vote to defund Obamacase.APynckel wrote:That he would vote to defund obamacare, then vote FOR cloture so that the dems would win, and he would get a political "no" vote on the final bill.......Charles L. Cotton wrote:What lie did Cornyn tell?APynckel wrote:There should always be a "final option" if the person you elected outright lied to you about their intentions.atticus wrote:I was not aware we have recall for U.S. senators in Texas. I, for one, don't believe in recalls. I think we make our best judgment at election time. Our next judgment, as voters, comes at the time of the next election. I think a no-recall system promotes good representative government - we elect people we believe will use their best judgment during their term. And then we allow them to exercise that judgment. If, as in Cornyn's case, it turns out that the elected representative takes a stand on one or more issues that is so bad we don't want that person in office any more, then we can have it out at the next election campaign. That being said, I believe Cornyn is up for re-election in 2014. He may well draw a primary opponent over this Obamacare issue.
Chas.
You worry me chaz.
Chas.
BOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOM
Chas.
Which he KNEW would result in a straight party line vote by the demorats to put the funding back in.APynckel wrote:He voted FOR cloture.....Charles L. Cotton wrote:Not quite, now show me his vote to add funding back to the Senate bill.APynckel wrote:" onclick="window.open(this.href);return false;Charles L. Cotton wrote:Please link to a post where Sen. Cornyn said he'd vote to defund Obamacase.APynckel wrote:That he would vote to defund obamacare, then vote FOR cloture so that the dems would win, and he would get a political "no" vote on the final bill.......Charles L. Cotton wrote:What lie did Cornyn tell?APynckel wrote:There should always be a "final option" if the person you elected outright lied to you about their intentions.atticus wrote:I was not aware we have recall for U.S. senators in Texas. I, for one, don't believe in recalls. I think we make our best judgment at election time. Our next judgment, as voters, comes at the time of the next election. I think a no-recall system promotes good representative government - we elect people we believe will use their best judgment during their term. And then we allow them to exercise that judgment. If, as in Cornyn's case, it turns out that the elected representative takes a stand on one or more issues that is so bad we don't want that person in office any more, then we can have it out at the next election campaign. That being said, I believe Cornyn is up for re-election in 2014. He may well draw a primary opponent over this Obamacare issue.
Chas.
You worry me chaz.
Chas.
BOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOM
Chas.
http://trailblazersblog.dallasnews.com/ ... care.html/" onclick="window.open(this.href);return false;