Senate To Go After Some Handguns

As the name indicates, this is the place for gun-related political discussions. It is not open to other political topics.

Moderators: carlson1, Charles L. Cotton


Topic author
scottmeador

Senate To Go After Some Handguns

#1

Post by scottmeador »

http://www.feinstein.senate.gov/public/ ... lt-weapons" onclick="window.open(this.href);return false;

A couple of lines regarding specifically named guns especially caught my attention. The feds are so inept at everything else how can they even determine which guns are illegal and which are not.
User avatar

Kythas
Senior Member
Posts in topic: 2
Posts: 1685
Joined: Wed Feb 20, 2008 10:06 am
Location: McKinney, TX

Re: Senate To Go After Some Handguns

#2

Post by Kythas »

What is considered a "military characteristic"?
Summary of 2013 legislation

Following is a summary of the 2013 legislation:

Bans the sale, transfer, importation, or manufacturing of:
120 specifically-named firearms
Certain other semiautomatic rifles, handguns, shotguns that can accept a detachable magazine and have one military characteristic
Semiautomatic rifles and handguns with a fixed magazine that can accept more than 10 rounds
And ALL grandfathered weapons must be submitted to a national registration?
Requires that grandfathered weapons be registered under the National Firearms Act, to include:
Background check of owner and any transferee;
Type and serial number of the firearm;
Positive identification, including photograph and fingerprint;
Certification from local law enforcement of identity and that possession would not violate State or local law; and
Dedicated funding for ATF to implement registration
We need to fight this tooth and nail. The government has no reason to need to know what types and quantities of firearms I own, unless they need a count of them to know what to confiscate.
“I’m all in favor of keeping dangerous weapons out of the hands of fools. Let’s start with typewriters.” - Frank Lloyd Wright

"Both oligarch and tyrant mistrust the people, and therefore deprive them of arms" - Aristotle
User avatar

Oldgringo
Senior Member
Posts in topic: 1
Posts: 11203
Joined: Sat Mar 08, 2008 10:15 pm
Location: Pineywoods of east Texas

Re: Senate To Go After Some Handguns

#3

Post by Oldgringo »

scottmeador wrote:http://www.feinstein.senate.gov/public/ ... lt-weapons

A couple of lines regarding specifically named guns especially caught my attention. The feds are so inept at everything else how can they even determine which guns are illegal and which are not.
You do remember the immortal words of Nancy Pelosi, '...pass this bill so we can see what's in it...', don't you?
User avatar

RPBrown
Senior Member
Posts in topic: 1
Posts: 5038
Joined: Sun Mar 27, 2005 11:56 am
Location: Irving, Texas

Re: Senate To Go After Some Handguns

#4

Post by RPBrown »

I also have to laugh at the statements that during the AWB, crime involving "assault weapons and high capacity mags dropped significantly.

They dont have a clue what an assault weapon is and how do they measure crimes involving hi cap mags?
NRA-Benefactor Life member
TSRA-Life member
Image

Bitterclinger
Member
Posts in topic: 2
Posts: 80
Joined: Sat Dec 08, 2012 9:27 am

Re: Senate To Go After Some Handguns

#5

Post by Bitterclinger »

What a bunch of hogwash! It won't pass in this form. I think the registration thing is just a red-herring designed to look like a compromise when it comes to negotiations. Even an idiot like Feinstein can't hope that will fly.

...and exactly what the hell is a "military characteristic ?" I know the bureaucrats will come up with five hundred pages of definitions about how many whats have to be how many inches away from whatever..., but i reject the whole concept at its bedrock. The 2nd amendment makes no distinction between military and civilian arms, and neither should we.

If the Dims were honest, they'd just draw up a bill to repeal the 2nd amendment. I'd like an amendment to say that you can't enact a law or ordinance that overrides the clear and simple intent of any constitutional provision or amendment without following the constitutional amendment process. We still might end up in Feinstein's police state, but at least we'd deserve it.

Freaking lawyers!
User avatar

JALLEN
Senior Member
Posts in topic: 3
Posts: 3081
Joined: Mon May 30, 2011 4:11 pm
Location: Comal County

Re: Senate To Go After Some Handguns

#6

Post by JALLEN »

This looks like a heck of a lot of infringing to me.
Luckily, I have enough willpower to control the driving ambition that rages within me.
User avatar

H6RBW
Junior Member
Posts in topic: 1
Posts: 34
Joined: Mon May 16, 2011 9:07 pm
Location: Murphy, Texas

Re: Senate To Go After Some Handguns

#7

Post by H6RBW »

Senator, please, hold your breath until I get down to the office to register my guns. No, seriously, hold your breath - I won't be long.

Chris
Senior Member
Posts in topic: 1
Posts: 611
Joined: Sat Mar 12, 2005 10:32 pm
Location: DFW

Re: Senate To Go After Some Handguns

#8

Post by Chris »

H6RBW wrote:Senator, please, hold your breath until I get down to the office to register my guns. No, seriously, hold your breath - I won't be long.
Exactly. My Gonzales canon and I will be right here waiting.

RPB
Banned
Posts in topic: 2
Posts: 8697
Joined: Tue Nov 17, 2009 8:17 pm

Re: Senate To Go After Some Handguns

#9

Post by RPB »

Bitterclinger wrote:What a bunch of hogwash! It won't pass in this form. I think the registration thing is just a red-herring designed to look like a compromise when it comes to negotiations. Even an idiot like Feinstein can't hope that will fly.

...and exactly what the heck is a "military characteristic ?" I know the bureaucrats will come up with five hundred pages of definitions about how many whats have to be how many inches away from whatever..., but i reject the whole concept at its bedrock. The 2nd amendment makes no distinction between military and civilian arms, and neither should we.

If the Dims were honest, they'd just draw up a bill to repeal the 2nd amendment. I'd like an amendment to say that you can't enact a law or ordinance that overrides the clear and simple intent of any constitutional provision or amendment without following the constitutional amendment process. We still might end up in Feinstein's police state, but at least we'd deserve it.

Freaking lawyers!
Characteristics of military weapons:
black, green, blued, stainless, or camo colors

OR
a magazine release button

OR
sights
I'm no lawyer

"Never show your hole card" "Always have something in reserve"
User avatar

Blindref757
Senior Member
Posts in topic: 2
Posts: 508
Joined: Wed Jun 29, 2011 6:40 pm
Location: Denton

Re: Senate To Go After Some Handguns

#10

Post by Blindref757 »

Legislation is all about compromise. If they are determined to reenact the ban, the GOP should at the very minimum fight for a 20 round max on handgun magazines, and no federal registration.

I don't think that a Glock 19 or an XD that hold <20 in the standard magazines should be included in the ban. And you can't recall current AR's unless you are willing to pay fair market value for them.

But here is a better idea. They shouldn't even spend one second discussing guns until they can assure me with a Balanced Budget Amendment, that we will not have an economic collapse in this nation like Greece. Because if Greece happens in the USA, I will need and will use my AR-15 and my XD if necessary.
User avatar

sjfcontrol
Senior Member
Posts in topic: 3
Posts: 6267
Joined: Wed Oct 28, 2009 7:14 am
Location: Flint, TX

Re: Senate To Go After Some Handguns

#11

Post by sjfcontrol »

RPB wrote:
Bitterclinger wrote:What a bunch of hogwash! It won't pass in this form. I think the registration thing is just a red-herring designed to look like a compromise when it comes to negotiations. Even an idiot like Feinstein can't hope that will fly.

...and exactly what the heck is a "military characteristic ?" I know the bureaucrats will come up with five hundred pages of definitions about how many whats have to be how many inches away from whatever..., but i reject the whole concept at its bedrock. The 2nd amendment makes no distinction between military and civilian arms, and neither should we.

If the Dims were honest, they'd just draw up a bill to repeal the 2nd amendment. I'd like an amendment to say that you can't enact a law or ordinance that overrides the clear and simple intent of any constitutional provision or amendment without following the constitutional amendment process. We still might end up in Feinstein's police state, but at least we'd deserve it.

Freaking lawyers!
Characteristics of military weapons:
black, green, blued, stainless, or camo colors

OR
a magazine release button

OR
sights
Or

Ejects small quantities of lead (or other material) at high speeds.
Range Rule: "The front gate lock is not an acceptable target."
Never Forget. Image
User avatar

Kythas
Senior Member
Posts in topic: 2
Posts: 1685
Joined: Wed Feb 20, 2008 10:06 am
Location: McKinney, TX

Re: Senate To Go After Some Handguns

#12

Post by Kythas »

Blindref757 wrote:Legislation is all about compromise. If they are determined to reenact the ban, the GOP should at the very minimum fight for a 20 round max on handgun magazines, and no federal registration.

I don't think that a Glock 19 or an XD that hold <20 in the standard magazines should be included in the ban. And you can't recall current AR's unless you are willing to pay fair market value for them.

But here is a better idea. They shouldn't even spend one second discussing guns until they can assure me with a Balanced Budget Amendment, that we will not have an economic collapse in this nation like Greece. Because if Greece happens in the USA, I will need and will use my AR-15 and my XD if necessary.
The GOP should fight to oppose any ban, period. No compromise can be made on this issue.
“I’m all in favor of keeping dangerous weapons out of the hands of fools. Let’s start with typewriters.” - Frank Lloyd Wright

"Both oligarch and tyrant mistrust the people, and therefore deprive them of arms" - Aristotle
User avatar

ajwakeboarder
Senior Member
Posts in topic: 1
Posts: 607
Joined: Sun Sep 18, 2011 3:06 pm
Location: Hurst, TX

Re: Senate To Go After Some Handguns

#13

Post by ajwakeboarder »

ok, 2 things. 1 I will never register any of my firearms. 2 what if you build your own "assault rifle" would they be able to "specifically name" it?
SI VIS PACEM PARA BELLUM
ΜΟΛΩΝ ΛΑΒΕ

ryouiki
Member
Posts in topic: 1
Posts: 67
Joined: Fri Nov 23, 2012 12:01 pm

Re: Senate To Go After Some Handguns

#14

Post by ryouiki »

Kythas wrote:What is considered a "military characteristic"?
I would put it past ole Frankestein that "military characteristic" is anything that has a Picatinny rail... I'm sure they are also still looking to ban anything with "the thing that goes up".
NRA Lifetime Member
User avatar

Blindref757
Senior Member
Posts in topic: 2
Posts: 508
Joined: Wed Jun 29, 2011 6:40 pm
Location: Denton

Re: Senate To Go After Some Handguns

#15

Post by Blindref757 »

My first choice is Secession! :txflag:
Post Reply

Return to “Gun and/or Self-Defense Related Political Issues”