Stand Your Ground in Danger

As the name indicates, this is the place for gun-related political discussions. It is not open to other political topics.

Moderators: carlson1, Charles L. Cotton

User avatar

VMI77
Senior Member
Posts in topic: 43
Posts: 6096
Joined: Tue Jun 29, 2010 5:49 pm
Location: Victoria, Texas

Re: Stand Your Ground in Danger

#241

Post by VMI77 »

Trayvon supporters in the news: http://market-ticker.org/akcs-www?post=203972
NORTH MIAMI BEACH, Fla. -

North Miami Beach police said surveillance video shows dozens of high school students demonstrating in the Trayvon Martin case Friday ransacking a Walgreens store.

The incident occurred during a walkout from North Miami Beach Senior High School in support of Martin, 17, who was fatally shot in Sanford.
http://lancasteronline.com/article/loca ... z1qLcboEtb
A Millersville University student is charged with severely beating his ex-girlfriend and kidnapping her from a campus dormitory this weekend.

Akeem M. Johnson, 24, punched the victim at least 10 times Saturday morning before forcing her from her room at Burrowes Hall and into his car, according to a police affidavit.

On Friday night, he stood prominently at an on-campus rally regarding the death of Florida teenager Trayvon Martin, holding a sign saying, "I am Trayvon Martin."

http://www.ajc.com/news/bond-set-for-new-1398575.html
Oh, and finally you remember the New Black Panther guy who offered a $10,000 "reward" for the unlawful kidnapping of Zimmerman on national television? He was busted for allegedlybeing a felon in possession of a firearm in Georgia yesterday.

Incidentally, his bond was set at.... wait for it..... $10,000.

All the anti-gunners going to be shouting out about his low bail, asking why is isn't still in jail, after all, he's a FELON with a gun....aren't the lefties supposed to be against criminals with guns? We know better --they don't mind if thugs have guns, it's US they don't want being able to defend ourselves from thugs.
"Journalism, n. A job for people who flunked out of STEM courses, enjoy making up stories, and have no detectable integrity or morals."

From the WeaponsMan blog, weaponsman.com

ScooterSissy
Senior Member
Posts in topic: 18
Posts: 795
Joined: Thu Mar 15, 2012 1:23 pm

Re: Stand Your Ground in Danger

#242

Post by ScooterSissy »

VMI77 wrote:Trayvon supporters in the news: http://market-ticker.org/akcs-www?post=203972
...
http://lancasteronline.com/article/loca ... z1qLcboEtb
A Millersville University student is charged with severely beating his ex-girlfriend and kidnapping her from a campus dormitory this weekend.

Akeem M. Johnson, 24, punched the victim at least 10 times Saturday morning before forcing her from her room at Burrowes Hall and into his car, according to a police affidavit.

On Friday night, he stood prominently at an on-campus rally regarding the death of Florida teenager Trayvon Martin, holding a sign saying, "I am Trayvon Martin."
...
Of course he too was part of the "I Am Trayvon" crowd. Just like Trayvon, he was "unarmed".
User avatar

The Annoyed Man
Senior Member
Posts in topic: 15
Posts: 26836
Joined: Wed Jan 16, 2008 12:59 pm
Location: North Richland Hills, Texas
Contact:

Re: Stand Your Ground in Danger

#243

Post by The Annoyed Man »

matriculated wrote:About Zimmerman: unfortunately for him, I think any semblance of a normal life going forward is probably impossible. Probably the best thing that could happen to him right now is to get indicted and convicted, spend a few years in the big house, get out early for good behavior, and hope that by then nobody will remember this incident. That way he might have a chance at a normal life. He's still young, only 28. If, however, he gets acquitted, adios normal life forever. People will know who he is, he will get recognized, and there are always people out there willing to do violence if they feel the justice system didn't do its job. I'm not saying it's right, I'm saying that's reality. He'll always have to look over his shoulder for as long as he's alive. He would become the OJ of central FL (and I'm not talking about the delicious FL orange juice).
ARE YOU SERIOUS???!!!????

Are you even interested in justice? Please....whatever you do, don't you ever speak in my defense about anything, even if you agree with me. I don't need that kind of friends
“Hard times create strong men. Strong men create good times. Good times create weak men. And, weak men create hard times.”

― G. Michael Hopf, "Those Who Remain"

#TINVOWOOT
User avatar

Keith B
Moderator
Posts in topic: 10
Posts: 18498
Joined: Sat Aug 18, 2007 3:29 pm

Re: Stand Your Ground in Danger

#244

Post by Keith B »

OK folks. This thread is getting way to personal. I will make a suggestion that everyone drop the discussion for now and cool your jets. If it continues on the downward spiral, then it will be locked.
Keith
Texas LTC Instructor, Missouri CCW Instructor, NRA Certified Pistol, Rifle, Shotgun Instructor and RSO, NRA Life Member

Psalm 82:3-4
User avatar

sugar land dave
Senior Member
Posts in topic: 1
Posts: 1396
Joined: Mon Jan 24, 2011 12:03 am
Location: Sugar Land, TX

Re: Stand Your Ground in Danger

#245

Post by sugar land dave »

How did we get to drug use and drinking? :???:

and did someone actually say or imply that everyone has done it? :shock:

I am getting a little on in years, but I have never smoked anything, and I cannot drink alcohol, so I am no expert on those actions, but everyone? I feel that might be a bit of a stretch.

On topic, I don't think SYG is in trouble beyond saving.
DPS Received Forms- 1/18/11 Online Status - 1/27/11 My Mailbox - 2/12/11
NRA Life Member

ScooterSissy
Senior Member
Posts in topic: 18
Posts: 795
Joined: Thu Mar 15, 2012 1:23 pm

Re: Stand Your Ground in Danger

#246

Post by ScooterSissy »

sugar land dave wrote:How did we get to drug use and drinking? :???:

and did someone actually say or imply that everyone has done it? :shock:
...
I'm new here, but this was the quote in this thread(I highlighted the most relevant part):
matriculated wrote:Two more things:

1. The reason Martin was suspended from school is irrelevant. I see some people trying to kill Martin's character and, in effect, make his shooting death justified by the fact that he got in trouble as a teenager. That's wrong. So he got suspended for an empty baggy with marijuana residue. How many of the forum members here can claim they've never, EVER, smoked some pot? In high school? Come on. Is it really a big deal? I know several doctors and lawyers who were proverbial potheads in high school, yet somehow are able to be extremely productive members of society. Including me. I'm a college educated white male, I pay may taxes, and guess what, I've smoked pot in the past. Shoot me. It's irrelevant to the case.
...

mamabearCali
Senior Member
Posts in topic: 16
Posts: 2214
Joined: Mon Feb 07, 2011 4:14 pm
Location: Chesterfield, VA

Re: Stand Your Ground in Danger

#247

Post by mamabearCali »

On topic: I think we just have to...... wait for it......Stand our Ground!

"rlol" "rlol" "rlol"
SAHM to four precious children. Wife to a loving husband.

"The women of this country learned long ago those without swords can still die upon them!" Eowyn in LOTR Two Towers

tommyg
Senior Member
Posts in topic: 3
Posts: 875
Joined: Sun Aug 07, 2011 9:59 am
Location: Dale, TX

Re: Stand Your Ground in Danger

#248

Post by tommyg »

Like I said in a previous post. None of us knows what happened.
All we are gitting is info from the news media they are more
interested in selling news papers than anything else. Please
leave it for courts and real investigators to get to the bottom of this.
Continuing to stir this up will only make it worse for everyone.
Cooler heads need to prevail in this matter please be cool. Making this
worse is a :nono:
N.R.A. benefactor Member :tiphat: Please Support the N.R.A. :patriot:
User avatar

v-rog
Senior Member
Posts in topic: 3
Posts: 794
Joined: Thu Jun 16, 2011 10:14 am
Location: Grand Prairie, Texas

Re: Stand Your Ground in Danger

#249

Post by v-rog »

I make a post and the thread is in danger of being locked ;-) ....Can I go for thread lock #3 : "rlol"
Keith B wrote:OK folks. This thread is getting way to personal. I will make a suggestion that everyone drop the discussion for now and cool your jets. If it continues on the downward spiral, then it will be locked.
_____________________________________________________________________________________
Remember 31 Connollystraße & Benghazi
Faith Under Fire ISBN# 9780307408815
User avatar

74novaman
Senior Member
Posts in topic: 19
Posts: 3798
Joined: Wed Feb 18, 2009 7:36 am
Location: CenTex

Re: Stand Your Ground in Danger

#250

Post by 74novaman »

v-rog wrote:I make a post and the thread is in danger of being locked ;-) ....Can I go for thread lock #3 : "rlol"
Keith B wrote:OK folks. This thread is getting way to personal. I will make a suggestion that everyone drop the discussion for now and cool your jets. If it continues on the downward spiral, then it will be locked.
Don't worry, there were some *ahem* interesting *ahem* personal attacks and rants earlier in the thread.

I don't think its your fault. ;-)
TANSTAAFL

smoothoperator
Senior Member
Posts in topic: 1
Posts: 579
Joined: Thu Dec 15, 2011 8:15 pm

Re: Stand Your Ground in Danger

#251

Post by smoothoperator »

IBTL and load
User avatar

i8godzilla
Senior Member
Posts in topic: 3
Posts: 1184
Joined: Mon Jun 21, 2010 10:13 am
Location: Central TX
Contact:

Re: Stand Your Ground in Danger

#252

Post by i8godzilla »

VMI77 wrote:
Heartland Patriot wrote:Did someone actually imply that every forum member had smoke marijuana at some point? Because I, for one, have NOT...I've smoked way too many tobacco cigarettes (before I quit a few months ago) and I've drank my fair share of cold beers and other alcoholic concoctions during my time with the USAF...but I have, once again, NEVER smoked marijuana nor have I ever taken any other illegal drugs, not even once, not even "just to try it". And I have no desire to start.
The use of marijuana, and it appears to be USE in this case, not merely experimentation, shows indifference to the law. People who are indifferent to one law like this are usually indifferent to others as well. There appears to be some indication that he SOLD marijuana, and if so, that is well beyond the indifference of the casual marijuana smoker, and rises to the level of contempt for the law. And "dealing" puts a person in another class of lawbreakers, since it means interacting with those heavily involved with the criminal element, and that suggests an attitude that is comfortable with inviting trouble --which in turns suggests a willingness to do violence. Who expects dealing illegal drugs to be a non-violent activity? Certainly not someone who advertises that he has "no limits."

I'm against the WOD and I think the drug laws and the way they are enforced not only cause more problems than they solve, but have eroded Constitutional protection for all of us. But I don't use or sell drugs because it's illegal. In fact, I consciously strive to obey the law, even the laws I don't agree with.
Does this include speeders, those that do not come to a complete stop, or refuse to use turn signals? Does buying a radar detector rise to the level of contempt? Just trying to determine where the line is. Funny how the 18th Amendment made many otherwise law abiding citizens criminals overnight and a few short year later the 21st Amendment restored them back to law abiding citizens.
No State shall convert a liberty into a privilege, license it, and charge a fee therefor. -- Murdock v. Pennsylvania
If the State converts a right into a privilege, the citizen can ignore the license and fee and engage in the right with impunity. -- Shuttleworth v. City of Birmingham
User avatar

lbuehler325
Member
Posts in topic: 1
Posts: 117
Joined: Sat Feb 18, 2012 11:17 pm
Location: DFW-ish

Re: Stand Your Ground in Danger

#253

Post by lbuehler325 »

Maybe I missed this in the past 17 pages of comments, but I think Stand Your Ground is not a valid issue in this case. What Zimmerman did was or wasn't justifiable homicide. To be justifiable, three main qualifiers must be met. 1. Zimmerman must have legally been allowed to be at the location of the incident, 2. Zimmerman must have reasonably been in imminent fear for for his life (or at least severe injury), and 3. Zimmerman must not have caused or instigated the situation. If any of these three are not satisfied beyond a reasonable level, most folks in his position should expect themselves to have the facts go to a grand jury at the minimum. If #3 is not satisfied (which seems to be the case from what is publicly known), then it is fair to expect his actions to come under scrutiny. This doesn't mean he was not justified. It simply means, he would have to defend his actions. With that said, "Stand Your Ground" wouldn't make an unjustified use of deadly force legal. If that were the case, any and every bully could start fights, and then shoot their victims once the victim starts fighting back. This is absurd, but that is essentially what the prohibitionists are implying. They do not understand the law. Whether Zimmerman was justified or not would not be influenced by a SYG statute.

Character assessments of either party are also not very helpful in this situation. Was Martin a "thug"? It shouldn't matter! Question is, was his shooting justified, and that has nothing to do with weather he was using/distributing drugs. Since when does a minor's drug use warrant death? Was Zimmerman a "wannabe cop" with a history of assault overstepping his bounds? History speaks to character, but not to the facts of that night. The proper question is who acted illegally that night? If Zimmerman acted improperly (lets not forget that a 911 dispatcher saying "don't follow" is hardly a lawful order), I would be just as concerned about the local PD for not doing a proper investigation and potentially letting a killer, or at least a demonstrated recklessly irresponsible CHL holder, walk away scott free.
RLTW!
TX CHL (Formerly licensed in PA, MA, KY)
MOPH, VFW, GOA, NRA, 82nd Airborne Division Association
User avatar

03Lightningrocks
Senior Member
Posts in topic: 32
Posts: 11451
Joined: Tue Apr 08, 2008 5:15 pm
Location: Plano

Re: Stand Your Ground in Danger

#254

Post by 03Lightningrocks »

sugar land dave wrote:How did we get to drug use and drinking? :???:

and did someone actually say or imply that everyone has done it? :shock:

I am getting a little on in years, but I have never smoked anything, and I cannot drink alcohol, so I am no expert on those actions, but everyone? I feel that might be a bit of a stretch.

On topic, I don't think SYG is in trouble beyond saving.
I am getting on in years and as a troubled teen tried about every drug known to man kind. Smoking pot never made me do anything other than laugh, eat everything in the house and fall asleep. It sure never made me or anyone else I ever saw stoned violent. Now drinking is a different story. I wish I had a nickel for every time I watched some redneck get all tough guy after drinking two beers. This thread is way too long to read every post, but some story about finding weed in this guys back pack does not make me think he is a bad guy in the slightest. It is also nothing more than the local cops trying to divert from the real issue. On what authority was Zimmerman donning his bat cape?

What this story does tell me is that armed watchmen and security guards are dangerous and don't have the proper training to be playing batman. Neither do the majority of us with a CHL. Don't chase me down and act like it is self defense when I clock you. The only one I won't go ninja on is a police officer. Security guards and neighborhood batmans are fair game. This is looking bad for the shooter. He never had any business chasing that kid down!

We are missing the point if we worry about the issue of whether Martin was a thug or not. The issue is that the shooter had no business acting as a cop. He didn't witness the kid committing any crime anyway! Are we really going to pretend this was a good shoot?
User avatar

jmra
Senior Member
Posts in topic: 14
Posts: 10371
Joined: Tue Feb 03, 2009 6:51 am
Location: Ellis County

Re: Stand Your Ground in Danger

#255

Post by jmra »

03Lightningrocks wrote:
sugar land dave wrote:How did we get to drug use and drinking? :???:

and did someone actually say or imply that everyone has done it? :shock:

I am getting a little on in years, but I have never smoked anything, and I cannot drink alcohol, so I am no expert on those actions, but everyone? I feel that might be a bit of a stretch.

On topic, I don't think SYG is in trouble beyond saving.
I am getting on in years and as a troubled teen tried about every drug known to man kind. Smoking pot never made me do anything other than laugh, eat everything in the house and fall asleep. It sure never made me or anyone else I ever saw stoned violent. Now drinking is a different story. I wish I had a nickel for every time I watched some redneck get all tough guy after drinking two beers. This thread is way too long to read every post, but some story about finding weed in this guys back pack does not make me think he is a bad guy in the slightest. It is also nothing more than the local cops trying to divert from the real issue. On what authority was Zimmerman donning his bat cape?

What this story does tell me is that armed watchmen and security guards are dangerous and don't have the proper training to be playing batman. Neither do the majority of us with a CHL. Don't chase me down and act like it is self defense when I clock you. The only one I won't go ninja on is a police officer. Security guards and neighborhood batmans are fair game. This is looking bad for the shooter. He never had any business chasing that kid down!

We are missing the point if we worry about the issue of whether Martin was a thug or not. The issue is that the shooter had no business acting as a cop. He didn't witness the kid committing any crime anyway! Are we really going to pretend this was a good shoot?
I think you are missing some very important information and making some large assumptions. Zimmerman was not on watch, he was going to the store. According to the physical evidence and eye witness accounts Zimmerman did not confront Martin and was returning to his vehicle when he was attacked from behind. He was being beaten (nose was broken and Martin was repeatedly smashing his head against the sidewalk). The only witness to the beating believed that Zimmerman was in enough danger that he ran to his cell phone to call 911. I guess you believe that since Zimmerman got out of his car and followed Martin at a distance in order to give the police a better discription that he should have let Martin continue to smash his head until he was dead instead of defending himself.
The facts in this case are simple. If Zimmerman did confront Martin (it appears that he did not) he retreated back toward his vehicle before being attacked. Stand your ground does not apply because he retreated and none of Zimmerman actions prior to retreating (none of which were illegal) are relevant once he retreated. Unless more evidence comes to light, Zimmermans account, eye witnesses, and physical evidence all support self-defense.
Life is tough, but it's tougher when you're stupid.
John Wayne
NRA Lifetime member
Post Reply

Return to “Gun and/or Self-Defense Related Political Issues”