51st State - hmmmm

As the name indicates, this is the place for gun-related political discussions. It is not open to other political topics.

Moderators: carlson1, Charles L. Cotton

User avatar

Keith B
Moderator
Posts in topic: 1
Posts: 18502
Joined: Sat Aug 18, 2007 3:29 pm

Re: 51st State - hmmmm

#16

Post by Keith B »

ddstuder wrote:
surprise_i'm_armed wrote:We should not add a 51st state.

It will screw up the nice 50 star flag we have now.

With 51, we'd have to go with 3 rows of 17 stars each! :-)

SIA

When Texas secedes, they can still have a pretty flag with 50 stars! :txflag:
Just a reminder, we do not discuss secession on the forum.
Keith
Texas LTC Instructor, Missouri CCW Instructor, NRA Certified Pistol, Rifle, Shotgun Instructor and RSO, NRA Life Member

Psalm 82:3-4
User avatar

jimlongley
Senior Member
Posts in topic: 2
Posts: 6134
Joined: Wed Jan 12, 2005 1:31 pm
Location: Allen, TX

Re: 51st State - hmmmm

#17

Post by jimlongley »

Maybe at the same time we could finally accomplish the split of NY and make it 52 stars instead.

A very long time ago I was peripherally involved in a movement to separate NY City from the rest of the state so that upstate was not being ruled by NY City politicians. Still seems like a good idea to me.
Real gun control, carrying 24/7/365
User avatar

The Annoyed Man
Senior Member
Posts in topic: 1
Posts: 26850
Joined: Wed Jan 16, 2008 12:59 pm
Location: North Richland Hills, Texas
Contact:

Re: 51st State - hmmmm

#18

Post by The Annoyed Man »

jimlongley wrote:Maybe at the same time we could finally accomplish the split of NY and make it 52 stars instead.

A very long time ago I was peripherally involved in a movement to separate NY City from the rest of the state so that upstate was not being ruled by NY City politicians. Still seems like a good idea to me.
I thought NYC was ruled by gangs, and that's why they need to get guns off the streets by making the law-abiding into criminals for owning them.

No? :mrgreen:
“Hard times create strong men. Strong men create good times. Good times create weak men. And, weak men create hard times.”

― G. Michael Hopf, "Those Who Remain"

#TINVOWOOT
User avatar

Fangs
Senior Member
Posts in topic: 1
Posts: 1229
Joined: Thu Dec 04, 2008 9:18 pm
Location: San Marcos, TX

Re: 51st State - hmmmm

#19

Post by Fangs »

How about Northern and Southern California?
"When I was a kid, people who did wrong were punished, restricted, and forbidden. Now, when someone does wrong, all of the rest of us are punished, restricted, and forbidden. The one who did the wrong is counselled and "understood" and fed ice cream." - speedsix
User avatar

pbwalker
Senior Member
Posts in topic: 1
Posts: 3032
Joined: Thu May 01, 2008 10:12 am
Location: Northern Colorado

Re: 51st State - hmmmm

#20

Post by pbwalker »

Fangs wrote:How about Northern and Southern California?
Only if both fall off in to the ocean. :thumbs2:
*NRA Endowment Member* | Veteran
Vote Adam Kraut for the NRA Board of Directors - http://www.adamkraut.com/

chabouk
Banned
Posts in topic: 2
Posts: 1219
Joined: Tue Oct 13, 2009 7:01 am

Re: 51st State - hmmmm

#21

Post by chabouk »

jimlongley wrote:Maybe at the same time we could finally accomplish the split of NY and make it 52 stars instead.

A very long time ago I was peripherally involved in a movement to separate NY City from the rest of the state so that upstate was not being ruled by NY City politicians. Still seems like a good idea to me.
I've never understood that. In Illinois, 80% of the state population is Chicago metro, so it's understandable that Chicago controls Springfield. But NYC is only 43% of the state's population; how do they continue to control Albany?
User avatar

OldSchool
Senior Member
Posts in topic: 5
Posts: 728
Joined: Sat Nov 21, 2009 9:01 pm
Location: Brazoria County

Re: 51st State - hmmmm

#22

Post by OldSchool »

pbwalker wrote:
Fangs wrote:How about Northern and Southern California?
Only if both fall off in to the ocean. :thumbs2:
I think he means the true Northern California -- way up above San Francisco, starting about Redding or Red Bluff up to the border. Otherwise known as the lower half of the Great State of Jefferson. :hurry:
Life is for learning.
IANAL, thank gosh!
NRA Life Member - TSRA - PSC
NRA Certified Basic Rifle Instructor, Chief Range Safety Officer

12/23/2009: Packets delivered.
01/15/2010: Plastic in hand!
User avatar

PSLOwner
Member
Posts in topic: 2
Posts: 110
Joined: Sat Nov 28, 2009 11:13 am

Re: 51st State - hmmmm

#23

Post by PSLOwner »

The Annoyed Man wrote:I thought NYC was ruled by gangs, and that's why they need to get guns off the streets by making the law-abiding into criminals for owning them.

No? :mrgreen:

Hence the movie, "The Gangs of New York". Plus, the movie, "The Warriors" was a documentary, right?
User avatar

Topic author
UncleBob
Member
Posts in topic: 3
Posts: 74
Joined: Fri Mar 12, 2010 1:25 am
Location: Austin

Re: 51st State - hmmmm

#24

Post by UncleBob »

"Warriors - Come out and play..." :smilelol5:
2/15/10 CHL Class
2/16/10 Packet Sent
2/17/10 Delivery Confirmation
2/25/10 Pin Received "Processing Application"
3/17/10 License issued or Certificate Active
3/20/10 Plastic in Hand

Semper Fi!
User avatar

jimlongley
Senior Member
Posts in topic: 2
Posts: 6134
Joined: Wed Jan 12, 2005 1:31 pm
Location: Allen, TX

Re: 51st State - hmmmm

#25

Post by jimlongley »

The Annoyed Man wrote:I thought NYC was ruled by gangs . . . :mrgreen:
It is, but they call themselves politicians.
chabouk wrote:I've never understood that. In Illinois, 80% of the state population is Chicago metro, so it's understandable that Chicago controls Springfield. But NYC is only 43% of the state's population; how do they continue to control Albany?
Because, like "Chicago metro" which includes areas out as far as Rockland, Aurora, and Joliet, they also get Long Island and "upstate" as far north as Nyack. If you include Suffolk, Orange, Rockland, and Westchester counties in with the five boroughs the representation becomes much more disproportionate.
Real gun control, carrying 24/7/365
Post Reply

Return to “Gun and/or Self-Defense Related Political Issues”