on Army COE land. this issue seems to have fizzled out ???
Army coe
Moderators: carlson1, Charles L. Cotton
Please Support the N.R.A. 
Re: Army coe
From the website of the legal eagle pursuing the case for the plaintiffs: https://www.mountainstateslegal.org/cas ... bmm_ORe6Uk
I emailed the Mountain States Legal Foundation a couple months ago and asked them how it was going. They did reply, didn't give any details, basically said what I put in the quote box above - it's being negotiated with the COE.
So yes, progress I think, slow, but probably not as slow as if it had to be litigated all the way to the SCOTUS.
ETA: A press release at the same site gives some more info: https://www.mountainstateslegal.org/new ... bmqOeRe6Uk
We already have a thread running in this here: http://texaschlforum.com/viewtopic.php? ... lit=morris
Basically the COE was fighting it until a new president was elected. Then, whether by chance or by cause, the COE has apparently changed its stance and is in "mediation" with the plaintiffs about revising COE policy.On March 3, 2017, on the eve of oral arguments before the Ninth Circuit in Seattle, federal lawyers filed an emergency motion stating their clients’ intention to ‘reconsider[] the firearms policy,’ which the panel granted.
I emailed the Mountain States Legal Foundation a couple months ago and asked them how it was going. They did reply, didn't give any details, basically said what I put in the quote box above - it's being negotiated with the COE.
So yes, progress I think, slow, but probably not as slow as if it had to be litigated all the way to the SCOTUS.
ETA: A press release at the same site gives some more info: https://www.mountainstateslegal.org/new ... bmqOeRe6Uk
We already have a thread running in this here: http://texaschlforum.com/viewtopic.php? ... lit=morris
USAF 1982-2005
____________
____________