My response to your question makes as much sense as your request for an answer, and your question is based on your unstated stance that SC is a much more desirable setting for exercising one's second amendment rights and that the SC folks have a much more civilized and efficient means of enacting legislation.Conagher wrote:anygunanywhere wrote:There are quite a few states that have less restrictive firearms laws than Texas and striving to regain our infringed freedoms here is our goal. To go along with my previous post, with the possible exception of this single issue, SC is not my idea of a truly free state with respect to firearms freedom.Conagher wrote:Thanks to everyone that replied. I appreciate everyone’s well thought out, germane and focused reply. I have a follow-up question for you:
Come September 1st, do you believe SC will be exercising their newly regained freedom while us Texans are still squabbling over the who’s, what’s and how’s?
If your idea of firearms nirvana is South Carolina then more power to you.
How many states are they reciprocal with? I remember! Only the ones the South Carolina Highway Patrol thinks are deserving of reciprocity. I believe our backwards law of mandating our fine attorney general to seek and establish reciprocity agreements is quite neanderthal compared to SC.
Anygunanywhere
Thanks for the response but after reading it a couple times I'm still not sure what your answer was to the referenced question, was it "yes" or "no"?
Thanks!
I lived in South Carolina for five years and have visited the state several times since so I know better.
Anygunanywhere