I can't speak to the rings on Andy's rifle, but if you look at the picture of my Remington 700 below, you'll see that the rings are already low, and I need to add a cheek rest to my stock also. The scope is a 5-20x50mm SWFA SSHD with a milling reticle:SRO1911 wrote:Just out of curiosity, and not trying trying to be rude, why would you go through the severe process of adding an adjustable cheek rest - when you have so much clearance to run shorter rings?
There are several issues at play here.....
- With riflescopes having a 50mm objective lens and a heavy barrel, low-mount rings can't always be used because the diameter of the bell of the objective lens is too big and won't clear the top of the barrel. My Remington in this picture has a heavy barrel, and you can plainly see from this picture that this 50mm objective lens scope would not normally have fit over the receiver/barrel with the low-mount rings I am using.
- The reason the scope/ring combination on this rifle does clear the barrel is that I've added a 20 MOA rail. This rifle is set up for long-range use, and I wanted the rail there to give me more elevation adjustment at longer ranges. But, the addition of the rail does raise the scope body up that much more, making the ring-height more like a medium height instead of low mount.
- Could I have gone for a lower-magnification scope with a smaller 42mm objective lens, low-mount rings, and no 20 MOA rail? Sure, I could have.....and lots of very well-trained long range shooters who are much more competent than myself use such scopes. But like a lot of aging shooters with fading eyesight, higher magnification levels and the greater light-gathering capabilities of a 50mm objective lens make it possible to continue enjoying this aspect of the sport.
- The height of this scope as is never used to bother me when shooting from a bench, but when I started getting some training in longer-range shooting, I was trained to shoot from the prone. On the bench, the cheek-weld is just a tad bit high, but not so high as to make for a poor shooting position. But a prone position places a whole new set of demands on the neck muscles. You are essentially having to crane your head backwards relative to your shoulders and torso in order to get your eye into the eye-box for a good sight picture. This can be tiring even for a younger, fitter person than myself. For someone my age, with an arthritic neck (heck, my entire spine) and poorer conditioning, keeping my neck craned like that gets to be excruciating after a couple of hours of shooting. Instead of being able to rest my cheek on the stock, I'm having to hold it just above the stock.........and all these brains of mine weigh a lot.
And with a bolt action rifle, it's important to remember that the bolt can't be removed if it won't clear the cheek-rest. With an adjustable one like Andy's, that's a non issue. With a more semi-permanent one like mine will be, I have to be mindful of that. It's worth noting, by the way, that a lot of custom rifle stocks come with an adjustable comb. Heck, even my over/under shotgun came with an adjustable comb.