Occupy Wall Street

Topics that do not fit anywhere else. Absolutely NO discussions of religion, race, or immigration!

Moderators: carlson1, Charles L. Cotton

Post Reply

Thomas

Re: Occupy Wall Street

#91

Post by Thomas »

The Mad Moderate wrote:
tbrown wrote:I want a sales tax that equally taxes every dollar someone chooses to spend.

Equality and choice. Why are they anathema to the left wing?
What do you not understand about the fact that a sales tax end up taxing a larger percent of lower income earners wages than it does the rich so you're ok with a tax increase on the poor but not the rich.
I think he understands perfectly when he said "every dollar someone chooses to spend." So should a person who has more money, but chooses not to spend it, be penalized?

If the government attempts to help someone out just because they are poor, then equally, the government is penalizing someone else because they are rich. That is what happens if they aren't taxed equally. So people should not be treated equally just because they have more of something or less of something than someone else?

EDIT: removed personalization from reasoning.
User avatar

The Mad Moderate
Senior Member
Posts in topic: 11
Posts: 872
Joined: Tue Nov 23, 2010 11:31 am
Location: Marble Falls

Re: Occupy Wall Street

#92

Post by The Mad Moderate »

Thomas wrote:
The Mad Moderate wrote:
tbrown wrote:I want a sales tax that equally taxes every dollar someone chooses to spend.

Equality and choice. Why are they anathema to the left wing?
What do you not understand about the fact that a sales tax end up taxing a larger percent of lower income earners wages than it does the rich so you're ok with a tax increase on the poor but not the rich.
I think he understands perfectly when he said "every dollar someone chooses to spend." So should a person who has more money, but chooses not to spend it, be penalized?

If the government attempts to help someone out just because they are poor, then equally, the government is penalizing someone else because they are rich. That is what happens if they aren't taxed equally. So people should not be treated equally just because they have more of something or less of something than someone else?

EDIT: removed personalization from reasoning.
So my "choice" to spend what little money I have on essentials should be punished at a higher overall rate than a rich person who has money to burn.
American by birth Texan by the grace of God

Not to be a republican at twenty is proof of want of heart; to be one at thirty is proof of want of head.
-Francois Guisot

talltex
Senior Member
Posts in topic: 4
Posts: 782
Joined: Fri Oct 21, 2011 9:40 pm
Location: Waco area

Re: Occupy Wall Street

#93

Post by talltex »

The Mad Moderate wrote:
tbrown wrote:I want a sales tax that equally taxes every dollar someone chooses to spend.

Equality and choice. Why are they anathema to the left wing?
:iagree:

What do you not understand about the fact that a sales tax end up taxing a larger percent of lower income earners wages than it does the rich so you're ok with a tax increase on the poor but not the rich.
It taxes everyone for what they spend on NON-NECESSITIES...the lower income wage earners do not pay taxes on groceries, utilities, rent, insurance, medical, dental, and so on. Do you actually believe the wealthy and higher wage middle/upper middle class don't spend MUCH MORE money on taxable luxury and discretionary goods? With a flat sales tax, those who have more and spend more will pay more...luxury vehicles, expensive clothing, high end home furnishings, etc...all those things they don't HAVE to have, but choose to spend their money on. If I choose to go out and buy a new set of golf clubs, a new fly rod, or gun I will pay additional taxes for that choice...it up to the individual. Equality and choice.
"I looked out under the sun and saw that the race is not always to the swift, nor the battle to the strong" Ecclesiastes 9:11

"The race may not always go to the swift or the battle to the strong, but that's the way the smart money bets" Damon Runyon
User avatar

tbrown
Senior Member
Posts in topic: 8
Posts: 1685
Joined: Thu Mar 17, 2011 4:47 pm

Re: Occupy Wall Street

#94

Post by tbrown »

The Mad Moderate wrote:
tbrown wrote:I want a sales tax that equally taxes every dollar someone chooses to spend.

Equality and choice. Why are they anathema to the left wing?
What do you not understand about the fact that a sales tax end up taxing a larger percent of lower income earners wages than it does the rich so you're ok with a tax increase on the poor but not the rich.
I know math and English are hard for some people but 8% of $175 is the same no matter who pays it.

Math doesn't discriminate.
It's the same for Rich or Poor.
It's the same for Black or White.
It's the same for Male or Female.
It's the same for Young or Old.
It's the same for Christian or Muslim.

Why do the socialists hate equal treatment in the law for everyone?





If you were wondering, it's $14.
sent to you from my safe space in the hill country

Thomas

Re: Occupy Wall Street

#95

Post by Thomas »

The Mad Moderate wrote:
Thomas wrote:
The Mad Moderate wrote:
tbrown wrote:I want a sales tax that equally taxes every dollar someone chooses to spend.

Equality and choice. Why are they anathema to the left wing?
What do you not understand about the fact that a sales tax end up taxing a larger percent of lower income earners wages than it does the rich so you're ok with a tax increase on the poor but not the rich.
I think he understands perfectly when he said "every dollar someone chooses to spend." So should a person who has more money, but chooses not to spend it, be penalized?

If the government attempts to help someone out just because they are poor, then equally, the government is penalizing someone else because they are rich. That is what happens if they aren't taxed equally. So people should not be treated equally just because they have more of something or less of something than someone else?

EDIT: removed personalization from reasoning.
So my "choice" to spend what little money I have on essentials should be punished at a higher overall rate than a rich person who has money to burn.
If you want to look at it that way. As long as you believe in "overall rates", you will always be correct. As long as I believe in treating everyone equally, I will always be correct. There's no sense in arguing numbers. For any real headway to be made, the discussion must boil down to the basics.

talltex
Senior Member
Posts in topic: 4
Posts: 782
Joined: Fri Oct 21, 2011 9:40 pm
Location: Waco area

Re: Occupy Wall Street

#96

Post by talltex »

So my "choice" to spend what little money I have on essentials should be punished at a higher overall rate than a rich person who has money to burn.
Once again...the money you choose to spend on "essentials" is not subject to sales tax...never has been. Basic grocery items ( milk, bread, vegetables, meat, etc...) are non taxable...discretionary items such as beer, wine, tobacco are taxed.The roof over your head is not taxed if you are renting...property OWNERS have to pay property taxes, which are used to provide municipal and county services, road maintenance, police and fire departments, and free public schools for EVERYONE...including those who pay NO taxes. If you CHOOSE to, you can buy clothing during an annual tax holiday prior to start of the school year, and avoid paying any tax on those items also.
"I looked out under the sun and saw that the race is not always to the swift, nor the battle to the strong" Ecclesiastes 9:11

"The race may not always go to the swift or the battle to the strong, but that's the way the smart money bets" Damon Runyon
User avatar

Bart
Senior Member
Posts in topic: 3
Posts: 718
Joined: Tue Sep 18, 2007 2:23 pm
Location: Deep in the Heart
Contact:

Re: Occupy Wall Street

#97

Post by Bart »

I think there should be one sales tax rate for all sales. Carbonated water and Coke should be taxed the same. Newspapers and magazines should be taxed the same. Ice and liquid water should be taxed the same. Fresh sandwiches and frozen sandwiches should be taxed the same. Frozen pizzas and frozen pizza crusts should be taxed the same.

Equality. Choice. Freedom.

:txflag:
Last edited by Bart on Sat Oct 29, 2011 6:34 pm, edited 1 time in total.
Those who cannot remember the past are condemned to repeat it.
User avatar

C-dub
Senior Member
Posts in topic: 13
Posts: 13562
Joined: Sat May 16, 2009 7:18 pm
Location: DFW

Re: Occupy Wall Street

#98

Post by C-dub »

What I fail to understand is why the OWS bunch and most if not all liberals scream that the rich (1%) should pay their fair share when many of the 99% don't pay ANY share.
I am not and have never been a LEO. My avatar is in honor of my friend, Dallas Police Sargent Michael Smith, who was murdered along with four other officers in Dallas on 7.7.2016.
NRA Patriot-Endowment Lifetime Member---------------------------------------------Si vis pacem, para bellum.................................................Patriot Guard Rider
User avatar

Bart
Senior Member
Posts in topic: 3
Posts: 718
Joined: Tue Sep 18, 2007 2:23 pm
Location: Deep in the Heart
Contact:

Re: Occupy Wall Street

#99

Post by Bart »

C-dub wrote:What I fail to understand is why the OWS bunch and most if not all liberals scream that the rich (1%) should pay their fair share when many of the 99% don't pay ANY share.
Unlike the mad moderates, the OWS herd are mostly Marxists and communists.
Those who cannot remember the past are condemned to repeat it.

Thomas

Re: Occupy Wall Street

#100

Post by Thomas »

Bart wrote:
C-dub wrote:What I fail to understand is why the OWS bunch and most if not all liberals scream that the rich (1%) should pay their fair share when many of the 99% don't pay ANY share.
Unlike the mad moderates, the OWS herd are mostly Marxists and communists.
And some crazies: http://boingboing.net/2011/10/29/howto- ... -349067579

Dave2
Senior Member
Posts in topic: 4
Posts: 3166
Joined: Thu Sep 02, 2010 1:39 am
Location: Bay Area, CA

Re: Occupy Wall Street

#101

Post by Dave2 »

RPB wrote:Occupy DC to secede from the United States

They are drafting a Constitution

(He thinks USA drafted Constitution in 1775, poor uneducated fellow)

VIDEO and Read more: http://dailycaller.com/2011/10/29/occup ... z1cB6ZruJO" onclick="window.open(this.href);return false;
So... They're going to declare themselves a sovereign nation? Wouldn't that make them foreign hostile invaders? Who's authorized to surrender on their behalf when they realize they forgot ammo?
I am not a lawyer, nor have I played one on TV, nor did I stay at a Holiday Inn Express last night, nor should anything I say be taken as legal advice. If it is important that any information be accurate, do not use me as the only source.

Thomas

Re: Occupy Wall Street

#102

Post by Thomas »

Dave2 wrote:
RPB wrote:Occupy DC to secede from the United States

They are drafting a Constitution

(He thinks USA drafted Constitution in 1775, poor uneducated fellow)

VIDEO and Read more: http://dailycaller.com/2011/10/29/occup ... z1cB6ZruJO" onclick="window.open(this.href);return false;
So... They're going to declare themselves a sovereign nation? Wouldn't that make them foreign hostile invaders? Who's authorized to surrender on their behalf when they realize they forgot ammo?
"rlol" That's the first time I saw that post by RPB (that you quoted).

RPB
Banned
Posts in topic: 17
Posts: 8697
Joined: Tue Nov 17, 2009 8:17 pm

Re: Occupy Wall Street

#103

Post by RPB »

Since some are learning that the jail is warm and has food ... I hope they continue drafting their Constitution, but they may want to take a history/Government Course first, (1775, my goodness, it was adopted in 1787) perhaps some executive order could be done to make those classes free for non-citizens or "those about to be" :lol:

Hopefully, they'll succeed in seceding and not be part of our Country... then.... they won't be able to vote in our elections.
:patriot: :evil2:
Last edited by RPB on Sat Oct 29, 2011 8:46 pm, edited 2 times in total.
I'm no lawyer

"Never show your hole card" "Always have something in reserve"
User avatar

C-dub
Senior Member
Posts in topic: 13
Posts: 13562
Joined: Sat May 16, 2009 7:18 pm
Location: DFW

Re: Occupy Wall Street

#104

Post by C-dub »

Thomas wrote:
Dave2 wrote:
RPB wrote:Occupy DC to secede from the United States

They are drafting a Constitution

(He thinks USA drafted Constitution in 1775, poor uneducated fellow)

VIDEO and Read more: http://dailycaller.com/2011/10/29/occup ... z1cB6ZruJO" onclick="window.open(this.href);return false;
So... They're going to declare themselves a sovereign nation? Wouldn't that make them foreign hostile invaders? Who's authorized to surrender on their behalf when they realize they forgot ammo?
"rlol" That's the first time I saw that post by RPB (that you quoted).
We have everything any other city has. What about electricity or water or Emergency services? This reminds me of an old joke.

Several scientists called to God and said they had figured out how He created life and they could do the same thing. They explained how He had taken the raw materials and mixed them together in just the right amounts and then applied an electrical charge to spark the organism to life. God thought for a second and decided this should be interesting, so He asked the scientists to demonstrate.

The scientists brought in some dirt and amino acids and started to mix it all together when God said, "Wait. Get your own dirt."
I am not and have never been a LEO. My avatar is in honor of my friend, Dallas Police Sargent Michael Smith, who was murdered along with four other officers in Dallas on 7.7.2016.
NRA Patriot-Endowment Lifetime Member---------------------------------------------Si vis pacem, para bellum.................................................Patriot Guard Rider

apostate
Senior Member
Posts in topic: 4
Posts: 2336
Joined: Sun Oct 14, 2007 10:01 am

Re: Occupy Wall Street

#105

Post by apostate »

C-dub wrote:Several scientists called to God and said they had figured out how He created life and they could do the same thing. They explained how He had taken the raw materials and mixed them together in just the right amounts and then applied an electrical charge to spark the organism to life. God thought for a second and decided this should be interesting, so He asked the scientists to demonstrate.

The scientists brought in some dirt and amino acids and started to mix it all together when God said, "Wait. Get your own dirt."
[youtube][/youtube]
Post Reply

Return to “Off-Topic”