I will agree with you that he should not be climbing your fence.The Annoyed Man wrote:I just spent $500 yesterday getting my wrought iron driveway gate fixed. It was sagging so much that it need to have a section of it cut out and new steel welded into place. The reason it is sagging is that the guy from Encor/Reliant/Whatever (I'm a Stream Energy customer) keeps climbing over my fence to read my meter. I don't have a problem with him reading the meter, but the gate/fence are well over 6' tall, and when he climbs over it, his weight causes it to sag. If he would just come to my door and ask permission, I would let him every time (I work at home), and it wouldn't add but 60 seconds to the process of reading my meter. Each time I've caught up to him and asked him to knock on my door the next time, he literally waves me off and just keeps on walking.
I went out and bought some "Beware of Dog" signs to put on the fence. Let him think twice about whether or not he wants to keep climbing my fence without permission. The rassinfrassin' bleepedy bleep.
What they should do is to give you the three months the PUC dictates for you to have your meter moved to an accessible location. After that, they should cut you off until you get it done. The PUC mandated in 2007 that meters should be able to be read without having to get someone to unlock a gate. The PUC felt it was unfair to most customers for some customers to have "special" meter reading requirements. As you say in your case, it would only take an additional 60 seconds to come to your door, imagine what would happen if 3,000,000 customers (per the Oncor website - 5,000,000 for Centerpoint) needed that type of "special" consideration. It would add 50,000 man hours to the meter reading task. If the meter readers did that, those of us who have accessible meters would end up subsidizing those of you who need "special" treatment. This is just as bad as the people who don't keep their trees trimmed away from the power lines. Those of us who do keep ours trimmed (or don't have trees) end up subsidizing those of you who, again, expect "special" treatment.