Shooting at Empire State Buildings

Topics that do not fit anywhere else. Absolutely NO discussions of religion, race, or immigration!

Moderators: carlson1, Charles L. Cotton

User avatar

baldeagle
Senior Member
Posts in topic: 8
Posts: 5240
Joined: Tue May 25, 2010 8:26 pm
Location: Richardson, TX

Re: Shooting at Empire State Buildings

#46

Post by baldeagle »

sjfcontrol wrote:
baldeagle wrote: According to this police officers forum:
ON DUTY
S&W 5946
Glock 19
Sigarms P226 DAO

OFF DUTY
Glock 26
S&W 3914
Sigarms P239
S&W 3953 TSW
S&W 640 .38

The Kahr K9 is no longer authorized although there are around 7,000 in the field
AFAIK, all those guns can be cocked. But you'd be an idiot to holster a cocked modern semi-automatic.

There's nothing wrong with a DAO or a heavy trigger pull if you practice regularly. If you don't practice regularly, there's a lot wrong with it.

When I practice with both of my Sigs (P226 9mm and P239 .357 Sig), I always start every magazine as double action. After all, if I'm in a bad situation and have to pull my weapon, the first shot is going to be double action. I'd better be used to it and able to shoot accurately, or the first shot is not only a complete waste but a danger to bystanders.
Well, I know the Glocks can't be cocked -- no hammer. Unless by cocked, you mean carrying with one in the chamber. And people carry modern semi-autos with one in the pipe all the time. That's the way I carry my XD-9, also striker-fired like the Glocks. And I swear I've seen officers carrying their SA guns with hammer cocked -- presumably with the safety on. So either we are talking about different things, or I disagree with the above highlighted statement. Are you saying you carry such that you'd have to rack the slide before shooting?
No. I was saying that if you have a DA/SA pistol and you carry it cocked, you're crazy. A 1911 (or any pistol) that has a safety should be carried cocked, right? Forgot about the Glocks.

Sorry for the confusion.
The Constitution preserves the advantage of being armed which Americans possess over the people of almost every other nation where the governments are afraid to trust the people with arms. James Madison
NRA Life Member Texas Firearms Coalition member
User avatar

The Annoyed Man
Senior Member
Posts in topic: 2
Posts: 26851
Joined: Wed Jan 16, 2008 12:59 pm
Location: North Richland Hills, Texas
Contact:

Re: Shooting at Empire State Buildings

#47

Post by The Annoyed Man »

baldeagle wrote:No. I was saying that if you have a DA/SA pistol and you carry it cocked, you're crazy. A 1911 (or any pistol) that has a safety should be carried cocked, right? Forgot about the Glocks.

Sorry for the confusion.
I used to own a USP Compact .40 which could be carried cocked and locked, or decocked DA. I carried it both ways.
“Hard times create strong men. Strong men create good times. Good times create weak men. And, weak men create hard times.”

― G. Michael Hopf, "Those Who Remain"

#TINVOWOOT
User avatar

baldeagle
Senior Member
Posts in topic: 8
Posts: 5240
Joined: Tue May 25, 2010 8:26 pm
Location: Richardson, TX

Re: Shooting at Empire State Buildings

#48

Post by baldeagle »

The Annoyed Man wrote:
baldeagle wrote:No. I was saying that if you have a DA/SA pistol and you carry it cocked, you're crazy. A 1911 (or any pistol) that has a safety should be carried cocked, right? Forgot about the Glocks.

Sorry for the confusion.
I used to own a USP Compact .40 which could be carried cocked and locked, or decocked DA. I carried it both ways.
Let me see if I can unscramble my horrible explanation. I meant that you shouldn't carry cocked and unlocked. Many modern semi-autos cannot be locked, so they should never be carried cocked. Is that better? Or should I give up and go away now? :bigear:
The Constitution preserves the advantage of being armed which Americans possess over the people of almost every other nation where the governments are afraid to trust the people with arms. James Madison
NRA Life Member Texas Firearms Coalition member
User avatar

sjfcontrol
Senior Member
Posts in topic: 6
Posts: 6267
Joined: Wed Oct 28, 2009 7:14 am
Location: Flint, TX

Re: Shooting at Empire State Buildings

#49

Post by sjfcontrol »

baldeagle wrote:
The Annoyed Man wrote:
baldeagle wrote:No. I was saying that if you have a DA/SA pistol and you carry it cocked, you're crazy. A 1911 (or any pistol) that has a safety should be carried cocked, right? Forgot about the Glocks.

Sorry for the confusion.
I used to own a USP Compact .40 which could be carried cocked and locked, or decocked DA. I carried it both ways.
Let me see if I can unscramble my horrible explanation. I meant that you shouldn't carry cocked and unlocked. Many modern semi-autos cannot be locked, so they should never be carried cocked. Is that better? Or should I give up and go away now? :bigear:
There are no "locks" on either my Glock, or my XD. Carrying either with one in the pipe would be "cocked and unlocked". Perhaps the "go away" option is the correct one... :biggrinjester: :smilelol5:
Range Rule: "The front gate lock is not an acceptable target."
Never Forget. Image
User avatar

baldeagle
Senior Member
Posts in topic: 8
Posts: 5240
Joined: Tue May 25, 2010 8:26 pm
Location: Richardson, TX

Re: Shooting at Empire State Buildings

#50

Post by baldeagle »

sjfcontrol wrote:
baldeagle wrote:
The Annoyed Man wrote:
baldeagle wrote:No. I was saying that if you have a DA/SA pistol and you carry it cocked, you're crazy. A 1911 (or any pistol) that has a safety should be carried cocked, right? Forgot about the Glocks.

Sorry for the confusion.
I used to own a USP Compact .40 which could be carried cocked and locked, or decocked DA. I carried it both ways.
Let me see if I can unscramble my horrible explanation. I meant that you shouldn't carry cocked and unlocked. Many modern semi-autos cannot be locked, so they should never be carried cocked. Is that better? Or should I give up and go away now? :bigear:
There are no "locks" on either my Glock, or my XD. Carrying either with one in the pipe would be "cocked and unlocked". Perhaps the "go away" option is the correct one... :biggrinjester: :smilelol5:
OK, now I've gotta ask ya. How do you cock a gun that doesn't have a trigger? :banghead: :banghead:
The Constitution preserves the advantage of being armed which Americans possess over the people of almost every other nation where the governments are afraid to trust the people with arms. James Madison
NRA Life Member Texas Firearms Coalition member
User avatar

sjfcontrol
Senior Member
Posts in topic: 6
Posts: 6267
Joined: Wed Oct 28, 2009 7:14 am
Location: Flint, TX

Re: Shooting at Empire State Buildings

#51

Post by sjfcontrol »

baldeagle wrote:
sjfcontrol wrote:
baldeagle wrote:
The Annoyed Man wrote:
baldeagle wrote:No. I was saying that if you have a DA/SA pistol and you carry it cocked, you're crazy. A 1911 (or any pistol) that has a safety should be carried cocked, right? Forgot about the Glocks.

Sorry for the confusion.
I used to own a USP Compact .40 which could be carried cocked and locked, or decocked DA. I carried it both ways.
Let me see if I can unscramble my horrible explanation. I meant that you shouldn't carry cocked and unlocked. Many modern semi-autos cannot be locked, so they should never be carried cocked. Is that better? Or should I give up and go away now? :bigear:
There are no "locks" on either my Glock, or my XD. Carrying either with one in the pipe would be "cocked and unlocked". Perhaps the "go away" option is the correct one... :biggrinjester: :smilelol5:
OK, now I've gotta ask ya. How do you cock a gun that doesn't have a trigger? :banghead: :banghead:
uhh, all guns have a trigger... I presume you mean a hammer?
I would presume it was cocked if there was a round in the chamber, and the gun would fire if the trigger was pulled. Essentially, the striker is retracted (at least part way). but yes, the term is not definitive on all handguns.
Range Rule: "The front gate lock is not an acceptable target."
Never Forget. Image
User avatar

baldeagle
Senior Member
Posts in topic: 8
Posts: 5240
Joined: Tue May 25, 2010 8:26 pm
Location: Richardson, TX

Re: Shooting at Empire State Buildings

#52

Post by baldeagle »

sjfcontrol wrote:uhh, all guns have a trigger... I presume you mean a hammer?
I would presume it was cocked if there was a round in the chamber, and the gun would fire if the trigger was pulled. Essentially, the striker is retracted (at least part way). but yes, the term is not definitive on all handguns.
OK, I surrender. I swear I'm not drinking, but my mind is clearly not working well. :banghead: :banghead:
The Constitution preserves the advantage of being armed which Americans possess over the people of almost every other nation where the governments are afraid to trust the people with arms. James Madison
NRA Life Member Texas Firearms Coalition member
User avatar

sjfcontrol
Senior Member
Posts in topic: 6
Posts: 6267
Joined: Wed Oct 28, 2009 7:14 am
Location: Flint, TX

Re: Shooting at Empire State Buildings

#53

Post by sjfcontrol »

baldeagle wrote:
sjfcontrol wrote:uhh, all guns have a trigger... I presume you mean a hammer?
I would presume it was cocked if there was a round in the chamber, and the gun would fire if the trigger was pulled. Essentially, the striker is retracted (at least part way). but yes, the term is not definitive on all handguns.
OK, I surrender. I swear I'm not drinking, but my mind is clearly not working well. :banghead: :banghead:
Maybe you should start. It can be clarifying. "in vino, veritas". "rlol"
Here
Range Rule: "The front gate lock is not an acceptable target."
Never Forget. Image

Heartland Patriot

Re: Shooting at Empire State Buildings

#54

Post by Heartland Patriot »

My Ruger SR-9c is a striker fired pistol similar in function to the Glock and the XD series. The striker (firing pin) is partially cocked (put under tension) by the action of cycling the slide to chamber a round. The trigger being pulled completes the rearward motion of the striker and then releases it after its spring has become fully tensioned...it fires. The cycle of the slide to eject and chamber the next round repeats the process, readying it for the next press of the trigger...however, my Ruger also has a safety that locks the slide. I find some comfort in having a striker fired pistol with a safety (after seeing the Fed shoot himself with the Glock), so that is why a bought the Ruger.
User avatar

sjfcontrol
Senior Member
Posts in topic: 6
Posts: 6267
Joined: Wed Oct 28, 2009 7:14 am
Location: Flint, TX

Re: Shooting at Empire State Buildings

#55

Post by sjfcontrol »

Heartland Patriot wrote:My Ruger SR-9c is a striker fired pistol similar in function to the Glock and the XD series. The striker (firing pin) is partially cocked (put under tension) by the action of cycling the slide to chamber a round. The trigger being pulled completes the rearward motion of the striker and then releases it after its spring has become fully tensioned...it fires. The cycle of the slide to eject and chamber the next round repeats the process, readying it for the next press of the trigger...however, my Ruger also has a safety that locks the slide. I find some comfort in having a striker fired pistol with a safety (after seeing the Fed shoot himself with the Glock), so that is why a bought the Ruger.
So, if you keep it pointed in a safe direction, and you keep your finger off the trigger until you're ready to shoot, and you always treat the gun like it was loaded -- you still need a mechanical safety? The DEA guy did none of that. :tiphat:
Range Rule: "The front gate lock is not an acceptable target."
Never Forget. Image
User avatar

sugar land dave
Senior Member
Posts in topic: 1
Posts: 1396
Joined: Mon Jan 24, 2011 12:03 am
Location: Sugar Land, TX

Re: Shooting at Empire State Buildings

#56

Post by sugar land dave »

baldeagle wrote:
The Annoyed Man wrote:
baldeagle wrote:No. I was saying that if you have a DA/SA pistol and you carry it cocked, you're crazy. A 1911 (or any pistol) that has a safety should be carried cocked, right? Forgot about the Glocks.

Sorry for the confusion.
I used to own a USP Compact .40 which could be carried cocked and locked, or decocked DA. I carried it both ways.
Let me see if I can unscramble my horrible explanation. I meant that you shouldn't carry cocked and unlocked. Many modern semi-autos cannot be locked, so they should never be carried cocked. Is that better? Or should I give up and go away now? :bigear:
Sigh..... some days its just better to take a timeout. ;-)
DPS Received Forms- 1/18/11 Online Status - 1/27/11 My Mailbox - 2/12/11
NRA Life Member
User avatar

Excaliber
Moderator
Posts in topic: 4
Posts: 6198
Joined: Tue May 27, 2008 9:59 pm
Location: DFW Metro

Re: Shooting at Empire State Buildings

#57

Post by Excaliber »

sjfcontrol wrote:
Heartland Patriot wrote:My Ruger SR-9c is a striker fired pistol similar in function to the Glock and the XD series. The striker (firing pin) is partially cocked (put under tension) by the action of cycling the slide to chamber a round. The trigger being pulled completes the rearward motion of the striker and then releases it after its spring has become fully tensioned...it fires. The cycle of the slide to eject and chamber the next round repeats the process, readying it for the next press of the trigger...however, my Ruger also has a safety that locks the slide. I find some comfort in having a striker fired pistol with a safety (after seeing the Fed shoot himself with the Glock), so that is why a bought the Ruger.
So, if you keep it pointed in a safe direction, and you keep your finger off the trigger until you're ready to shoot, and you always treat the gun like it was loaded -- you still need a mechanical safety? The DEA guy did none of that. :tiphat:
Agreed.

That incident was a perfect illustration of the fact that it's impossible to make anything foolproof.

There are two reasons this is true:

1. Fools are so ingenious

2.You can't fix stupid.
Excaliber

"An unarmed man can only flee from evil, and evil is not overcome by fleeing from it." - Jeff Cooper
I am not a lawyer. Nothing in any of my posts should be construed as legal or professional advice.
User avatar

Excaliber
Moderator
Posts in topic: 4
Posts: 6198
Joined: Tue May 27, 2008 9:59 pm
Location: DFW Metro

Re: Shooting at Empire State Buildings

#58

Post by Excaliber »

baldeagle wrote:
The Annoyed Man wrote:
baldeagle wrote:No. I was saying that if you have a DA/SA pistol and you carry it cocked, you're crazy. A 1911 (or any pistol) that has a safety should be carried cocked, right? Forgot about the Glocks.

Sorry for the confusion.
I used to own a USP Compact .40 which could be carried cocked and locked, or decocked DA. I carried it both ways.
Let me see if I can unscramble my horrible explanation. I meant that you shouldn't carry cocked and unlocked. Many modern semi-autos cannot be locked, so they should never be carried cocked. Is that better? Or should I give up and go away now? :bigear:

Many modern striker fired semiautos leave the striker either partially (Glock) or fully (XD) cocked when the slide is cycled. In these guns the striker takes the place of both an external hammer and firing pin in guns like the 1911.

The slide must be cycled in order to put a round in the chamber.

Therefore, if one agrees that these pistols should be carried with a round in the chamber so they can be fired without having to first cycle the slide, one must find peace with the fact that they will be either partially or fully cocked when the loading operation is completed.

Several hundreds of thousands of these guns are carried this way every day - including every Glock in the holsters of the tens of thousands of LEO's who carry this style of gun. This method of carry is not hazardous - unless the carrier is either so ignorant or careless that he shouldn't be touching serious machinery.

Another way of looking at this is; if the safety between left ear and right is missing, no mechanical device can make that carrier safe.
Excaliber

"An unarmed man can only flee from evil, and evil is not overcome by fleeing from it." - Jeff Cooper
I am not a lawyer. Nothing in any of my posts should be construed as legal or professional advice.

Heartland Patriot

Re: Shooting at Empire State Buildings

#59

Post by Heartland Patriot »

I didn't down anyone's choice of what pistol or brand they carry. I simply stated that I, me personally, felt better having a safety on my pistol after seeing that video. If others DON'T want that, then they are free to purchase and carry whatever works for them. We all win when there is a variety of good quality designs with different features.
User avatar

Excaliber
Moderator
Posts in topic: 4
Posts: 6198
Joined: Tue May 27, 2008 9:59 pm
Location: DFW Metro

Re: Shooting at Empire State Buildings

#60

Post by Excaliber »

Heartland Patriot wrote:I didn't down anyone's choice of what pistol or brand they carry. I simply stated that I, me personally, felt better having a safety on my pistol after seeing that video. If others DON'T want that, then they are free to purchase and carry whatever works for them. We all win when there is a variety of good quality designs with different features.
I agree with you that either option is fine for folks who are willing to learn how their pistol operates and practice enough to be able to operate it competently under stress.

At the empire state building shooting, the issues were tactics, marksmanship, and fire discipline.

With the DEA agent's video, the issues were irresponsibility and negligence.

All of those issues emanated from the area between the left ear and the right. Nothing on the guns involved would have fixed them.
Excaliber

"An unarmed man can only flee from evil, and evil is not overcome by fleeing from it." - Jeff Cooper
I am not a lawyer. Nothing in any of my posts should be construed as legal or professional advice.
Post Reply

Return to “Off-Topic”