Republican Convention: Cruz supporters planning trouble?

Topics that do not fit anywhere else. Absolutely NO discussions of religion, race, or immigration!

Moderators: carlson1, Charles L. Cotton

Locked
User avatar

LucasMcCain
Senior Member
Posts in topic: 1
Posts: 698
Joined: Wed Jan 06, 2016 2:00 pm
Location: DFW, Texas

Re: Republican Convention: Cruz supporters planning trouble?

#61

Post by LucasMcCain »

I will vote for the capitalist. I will vote against the socialist. That is voting my conscience.
I prefer dangerous freedom to safety in chains.

Let's go Brandon.
User avatar

Topic author
Charles L. Cotton
Site Admin
Posts in topic: 20
Posts: 17787
Joined: Wed Dec 22, 2004 9:31 pm
Location: Friendswood, TX
Contact:

Re: Republican Convention: Cruz supporters planning trouble?

#62

Post by Charles L. Cotton »

Jim Beaux wrote:Instead of denigrating those of us who will no longer run with the herd & support an unprincipled candidate & a corrupt system, maybe you should consider the future for your children & grandchildren. If we lose our constitution it will not be because of a president, but a malignant system.

I will not look at my sons and tell them that everything I taught them was morally right, I went against.
I am thinking of my grandchildren when I do the best I can in a bad, no critical situation. You can teach your sons to "sit this one out" because you don't like the choices, but I'll tell mine to suit up and fight the best they can fight. Doing nothing is not an option.

Chas.

parabelum
Senior Member
Posts in topic: 8
Posts: 2717
Joined: Mon Dec 21, 2015 12:22 pm

Re: Republican Convention: Cruz supporters planning trouble?

#63

Post by parabelum »

Lord forbid American Merkel gets elected, I will personally blame all of those "principled" so called pro-2A supporters who decided to "sit this one out" with their self righteous "we are the true Conservatives" indignation.

Some are my friends still, but trust me, if that happens they are my friends no more. "Sitting it out" is giving your vote to Lib fascists who will already have thousands of dead people voting illegitimately (some are morally and spiritually dead already).
User avatar

Jim Beaux
Senior Member
Posts in topic: 5
Posts: 1356
Joined: Mon Feb 20, 2012 11:55 pm

Re: Republican Convention: Cruz supporters planning trouble?

#64

Post by Jim Beaux »

Charles L. Cotton wrote:
Jim Beaux wrote:Instead of denigrating those of us who will no longer run with the herd & support an unprincipled candidate & a corrupt system, maybe you should consider the future for your children & grandchildren. If we lose our constitution it will not be because of a president, but a malignant system.

I will not look at my sons and tell them that everything I taught them was morally right, I went against.
I am thinking of my grandchildren when I do the best I can in a bad, no critical situation. You can teach your sons to "sit this one out" because you don't like the choices, but I'll tell mine to suit up and fight the best they can fight. Doing nothing is not an option.

Chas.
Ive made my choice & will be voting for the candidate who best represents my values.
“In the world of lies, truth-telling is a hanging offense"
~Unknown
User avatar

Jim Beaux
Senior Member
Posts in topic: 5
Posts: 1356
Joined: Mon Feb 20, 2012 11:55 pm

Re: Republican Convention: Cruz supporters planning trouble?

#65

Post by Jim Beaux »

parabelum wrote:Lord forbid American Merkel gets elected, I will personally blame all of those "principled" so called pro-2A supporters who decided to "sit this one out" with their self righteous "we are the true Conservatives" indignation.

Some are my friends still, but trust me, if that happens they are my friends no more. "Sitting it out" is giving your vote to Lib fascists who will already have thousands of dead people voting illegitimately (some are morally and spiritually dead already).
:thumbs2:
“In the world of lies, truth-telling is a hanging offense"
~Unknown
User avatar

Dusty Rivers
Junior Member
Posts in topic: 1
Posts: 11
Joined: Thu Jan 14, 2016 11:43 am

Re: Republican Convention: Cruz supporters planning trouble?

#66

Post by Dusty Rivers »

Charles L. Cotton wrote:My vote for Trump isn't a vote for the Republican Party or the Republican candidate. It's a vote against the person who will complete the destruction of America, not merely the Second Amendment. I do not vote with blinders on, nor out of any naive loyalty to the Republican Party. There are two people running and I'm voting for the best last chance to save the country.

Chas.
I absolutely agree with everything you have posted in this thread! If Clinton gets to appoint the judges the second amendment is over and done with. The boarders will be open and healthcare and education will tank due to all of the influx across the boarder. We have a proven liar in Clinton who went to bed when the phone rang. The Russian reset was a reset to the cold war. I know what Clinton can do we have proof. Time for someone else to try to answer the phone. Mr Trump has been right about everything to this point. He isn't PC, neither am I. I say what I think. That is the first amendment.

God bless America. Lets keep our 3 branches of government separate. Vote for the unproven one, cause the proven one has been proven wrong, wrong, wrong. DON"T set this one out!! Too many solders have died for your right to vote, don't let their efforts be in vain. :rules:

retrieverman
Member
Posts in topic: 1
Posts: 136
Joined: Tue Jun 26, 2007 11:26 pm
Location: Nacogdoches, TX

Re: Republican Convention: Cruz supporters planning trouble?

#67

Post by retrieverman »

Not voting or voting for a 3rd party is essentially voting for Hillary. I voted for Cruz in the primary but WILL vote for Trump in the general election.
User avatar

mojo84
Senior Member
Posts in topic: 11
Posts: 9043
Joined: Tue Jun 21, 2011 4:07 pm
Location: Boerne, TX (Kendall County)

Re: Republican Convention: Cruz supporters planning trouble?

#68

Post by mojo84 »

How about we all vote or don't vote and stop insulting and insinuating those with differing opinions are of lesser intelligence or lower character.

We didn't get in this predicament over night. It happened on our watch. The infighting and insults by insinuation are detrimental.

Let's keep in mind, Supreme Court appointees must be confirmed by the Senate.
Note: Me sharing a link and information published by others does not constitute my endorsement, agreement, disagreement, my opinion or publishing by me. If you do not like what is contained at a link I share, take it up with the author or publisher of the content.
User avatar

Take Down Sicko
Senior Member
Posts in topic: 1
Posts: 1026
Joined: Sat Mar 19, 2016 8:01 pm
Location: Houston Tx
Contact:

Re: Republican Convention: Cruz supporters planning trouble?

#69

Post by Take Down Sicko »

I'm really liking Melana for a First Lady.
User avatar

The Annoyed Man
Senior Member
Posts in topic: 6
Posts: 26836
Joined: Wed Jan 16, 2008 12:59 pm
Location: North Richland Hills, Texas
Contact:

Re: Republican Convention: Cruz supporters planning trouble?

#70

Post by The Annoyed Man »

Charles L. Cotton wrote:My vote for Trump isn't a vote for the Republican Party or the Republican candidate. It's a vote against the person who will complete the destruction of America, not merely the Second Amendment. I do not vote with blinders on, nor out of any naive loyalty to the Republican Party. There are two people running and I'm voting for the best last chance to save the country.

Chas.
Charles, I'm not in the business of suggesting to people how they should vote anymore, so I did not mean to suggest that you or anyone else here is voting blindly. But I have a question, IF there were either an acceptable 3rd party candidate or acceptable independent candidate alternative who had a reasonable chance (meaning "not entirely out of the range of possibility) of splitting off enough democrat, republican, and independent voters to have a shot at winning......and he/she had a pretty decent platform and wasn't a complete tool, would you be willing to consider that option? Or, do you think it is important that the nominee be a republican for other reasons......like which party controls Congress, for instance?

In fact, I'd ask all of you who are supporting more or less grudgingly supporting Trump the same question. And I'm not asking it to make a point. I'm just curious to know — given the peculiar dynamics of this election cycle and the dysfunction of the republican party — how much of the support for Trump is enthusiastic, and how much is simply a vote against Clinton. But again, I'm not going to presume to suggest that y'alls picks are wrong.......just not necessarily the same as mine.
“Hard times create strong men. Strong men create good times. Good times create weak men. And, weak men create hard times.”

― G. Michael Hopf, "Those Who Remain"

#TINVOWOOT
User avatar

mojo84
Senior Member
Posts in topic: 11
Posts: 9043
Joined: Tue Jun 21, 2011 4:07 pm
Location: Boerne, TX (Kendall County)

Re: Republican Convention: Cruz supporters planning trouble?

#71

Post by mojo84 »

In other words, are people playing offense or defense? I'm playing defense.
Last edited by mojo84 on Tue Jul 19, 2016 6:43 pm, edited 1 time in total.
Note: Me sharing a link and information published by others does not constitute my endorsement, agreement, disagreement, my opinion or publishing by me. If you do not like what is contained at a link I share, take it up with the author or publisher of the content.
User avatar

Topic author
Charles L. Cotton
Site Admin
Posts in topic: 20
Posts: 17787
Joined: Wed Dec 22, 2004 9:31 pm
Location: Friendswood, TX
Contact:

Re: Republican Convention: Cruz supporters planning trouble?

#72

Post by Charles L. Cotton »

The Annoyed Man wrote:
Charles L. Cotton wrote:My vote for Trump isn't a vote for the Republican Party or the Republican candidate. It's a vote against the person who will complete the destruction of America, not merely the Second Amendment. I do not vote with blinders on, nor out of any naive loyalty to the Republican Party. There are two people running and I'm voting for the best last chance to save the country.

Chas.
Charles, I'm not in the business of suggesting to people how they should vote anymore, so I did not mean to suggest that you or anyone else here is voting blindly. But I have a question, IF there were either an acceptable 3rd party candidate or acceptable independent candidate alternative who had a reasonable chance (meaning "not entirely out of the range of possibility) of splitting off enough democrat, republican, and independent voters to have a shot at winning......and he/she had a pretty decent platform and wasn't a complete tool, would you be willing to consider that option? Or, do you think it is important that the nominee be a republican for other reasons......like which party controls Congress, for instance?

In fact, I'd ask all of you who are supporting more or less grudgingly supporting Trump the same question. And I'm not asking it to make a point. I'm just curious to know — given the peculiar dynamics of this election cycle and the dysfunction of the republican party — how much of the support for Trump is enthusiastic, and how much is simply a vote against Clinton. But again, I'm not going to presume to suggest that y'alls picks are wrong.......just not necessarily the same as mine.
If the U.S. had a viable 3rd party that wins state and federal elections and I supported its platform and candidate, then I would consider voting for their candidate. I would do so only if that candidate had a reasonable chance of winning.

It is highly unlikely that a viable 3rd party will ever exist in the U.S. We have a far better chance of rebuilding the Republican Party than creating a viable 3rd Party. The establishment Republicans are running scared. McCain is in the fight of his political life and Ryan could be defeated.
Chas.
User avatar

JALLEN
Senior Member
Posts in topic: 6
Posts: 3081
Joined: Mon May 30, 2011 4:11 pm
Location: Comal County

Re: Republican Convention: Cruz supporters planning trouble?

#73

Post by JALLEN »

Many of us in a certain age group will probably be faced with accepting the idea that our cherished values are likely now shared by a shrinking, permanent minority.

You will not find candidates on ballots you can accept, who reflect your priorities, share your values, believe in many of your beliefs.
Luckily, I have enough willpower to control the driving ambition that rages within me.

Salty1
Senior Member
Posts in topic: 1
Posts: 924
Joined: Sun Aug 03, 2008 7:44 pm

Re: Republican Convention: Cruz supporters planning trouble?

#74

Post by Salty1 »

To me this election is about who will be nominating the Supreme Court Justices. Although I am not fond of either candidate I would rather that Trump make the selection rather than Clinton. A Clinton win has the possibility of making our 2nd Amendment rights a thing of the past, all it will take is one court challenge in front of a liberal stacked Supreme Court. The Supreme Court seems to be as political as the other branches of government.....
Salty1
User avatar

Glockster
Senior Member
Posts in topic: 1
Posts: 1075
Joined: Tue Mar 25, 2014 7:48 am
Location: Kingwood, TX

Re: Republican Convention: Cruz supporters planning trouble?

#75

Post by Glockster »

Charles L. Cotton wrote:
Jim Beaux wrote:Instead of denigrating those of us who will no longer run with the herd & support an unprincipled candidate & a corrupt system, maybe you should consider the future for your children & grandchildren. If we lose our constitution it will not be because of a president, but a malignant system.

I will not look at my sons and tell them that everything I taught them was morally right, I went against.
I am thinking of my grandchildren when I do the best I can in a bad, no critical situation. You can teach your sons to "sit this one out" because you don't like the choices, but I'll tell mine to suit up and fight the best they can fight. Doing nothing is not an option.

Chas.
Just listening to Chris Cox saying the very same thing at the RNC.
NRA Life Member
My State Rep Hubert won't tell me his position on HB560. How about yours?
Locked

Return to “Off-Topic”