Burleson Public Library Posted Both Signs
Moderators: carlson1, Charles L. Cotton
-
Topic author - Senior Member
- Posts in topic: 1
- Posts: 1701
- Joined: Tue Aug 04, 2009 1:37 am
- Location: Fort Worth, TX
Burleson Public Library Posted Both Signs
I recieved an email notice today from Texas30.06 that my local city library has posted both 30.06 and 30.07 signs.
The Only Bodyguard I Can Afford is Me
Texas LTC Instructor Cert
NRA Life Member
Texas LTC Instructor Cert
NRA Life Member
Re: Burleson Public Library Posted Both Signs
Is that a legal posting being that it is city property not holding or serving a court? I'm sure someone will chime in with an answer..
Re: Burleson Public Library Posted Both Signs
Go there in person. Observe and Photograph the sign(s), File a complaint with the city. Wait, forward the complaint to the AG's office.
Re: Burleson Public Library Posted Both Signs
This.amtank wrote:Go there in person. Observe and Photograph the sign(s), File a complaint with the city. Wait, forward the complaint to the AG's office.
USAF 1982-2005
____________
____________
-
- Senior Member
- Posts in topic: 1
- Posts: 1436
- Joined: Tue Feb 12, 2008 4:31 pm
- Location: SW Fort Worth
Re: Burleson Public Library Posted Both Signs
Some libraries are not city or county owned, but are their own "Library District".
Even so, when you look up the law that allows for a library district, the first thing that it says is that a library district is a political subdivision of the State of Texas. Thus, GC 411.209 still applies.
Take pictures and turn them in... I bet they think they are an "educational institution".
If I had more time, I would be the test case at the FW Zoo and get this "educational institution" crud over with.
Even so, when you look up the law that allows for a library district, the first thing that it says is that a library district is a political subdivision of the State of Texas. Thus, GC 411.209 still applies.
Take pictures and turn them in... I bet they think they are an "educational institution".
If I had more time, I would be the test case at the FW Zoo and get this "educational institution" crud over with.
"The trouble with our liberal friends is not that they're ignorant, it's just that they know so much that isn't so." - Ronald Reagan, 1964
30.06 signs only make criminals and terrorists safer.
NRA, LTC, School Safety, Armed Security, & Body Guard Instructor
30.06 signs only make criminals and terrorists safer.
NRA, LTC, School Safety, Armed Security, & Body Guard Instructor
Re: Burleson Public Library Posted Both Signs
Isn't the FW Zoo under the 75 acres required though?koine2002 wrote:I think the FW Zoo is claiming amusement park now. The language of the relevant laws seem to allow such a thing even though it is city owned.AJSully421 wrote:Some libraries are not city or county owned, but are their own "Library District".
Even so, when you look up the law that allows for a library district, the first thing that it says is that a library district is a political subdivision of the State of Texas. Thus, GC 411.209 still applies.
Take pictures and turn them in... I bet they think they are an "educational institution".
If I had more time, I would be the test case at the FW Zoo and get this "educational institution" crud over with.
NRA Benefactor Member
-
- Senior Member
- Posts in topic: 1
- Posts: 1345
- Joined: Thu Jul 02, 2009 1:50 pm
- Location: Fort Worth
Re: Burleson Public Library Posted Both Signs
Yes, according to the zoo, it is on 64 acres https://www.fortworthzoo.org/plan-a-visit/zoo-facts/Jago668 wrote:
Isn't the FW Zoo under the 75 acres required though?
I'm waiting with bated breath for Attorney General's response to my complaint about the Ft. Worth Zoo. Several were reporting that DPS said they wouldn't make any findings public until after the first of the year. So I'm hoping it will be within a week or so.
Edited to change DPS to AG.
Ron
NRA Member
NRA Member
-
- Senior Member
- Posts in topic: 1
- Posts: 5298
- Joined: Sat Dec 16, 2006 8:27 pm
- Location: Luling, TX
Re: Burleson Public Library Posted Both Signs
Some public libraries are actually private, not government. There is one near me that was started and is funded by a private memorial foundation. The building is not city owned and the librarians are not city employees. I believe that the city does have a contract to give them some money, but it is a private foundation with a library open to the public. This is the way Ben Franklin started the whole idea of free libraries, by the way.AJSully421 wrote:Some libraries are not city or county owned, but are their own "Library District".
One of these days, I need to check if my city hospital is still owned by the city. They contracted out the operation to Seton, but I don't know if they sold the building or kept it. Same principle in action if they sold it.
Steve Rothstein
-
- Member
- Posts in topic: 1
- Posts: 174
- Joined: Sun Dec 28, 2008 9:59 pm
- Location: Smithson Valley (Comal County)
Re: Burleson Public Library Posted Both Signs
Tim Riggins,
After seeing your post 1 and now this post 2, I highly suggest you read the forum rules or it will be unlikely there will be a post 3.
After seeing your post 1 and now this post 2, I highly suggest you read the forum rules or it will be unlikely there will be a post 3.
The person who has nothing for which he is willing to fight, nothing which is more important than his own personal safety, is a miserable creature and has no chance of being free unless made and kept so by the exertions of better men than himself.
-
- Senior Member
- Posts in topic: 1
- Posts: 251
- Joined: Tue Oct 26, 2010 12:17 pm
- Location: Rhome
Re: Burleson Public Library Posted Both Signs
The BRICK is also postedTexasGal wrote:I recieved an email notice today from Texas30.06 that my local city library has posted both 30.06 and 30.07 signs.
What country can preserve its liberties if its rulers are not warned from time to time that their people preserve the spirit of resistance?
Re: Burleson Public Library Posted Both Signs
this was their response:
"What it means is that whoever reported it didn't read the full sign. Since our board meetings are subject to the open meetings act, open and concealed carry is prohibited in the board room during meetings. Open and concealed carry is allowed in the rest of the building during the meeting and anywhere in the building when the rest of the time. tl;dr You can't carry in one room once a month for about an hour. The rest the building and open hours are fair game.."
"What it means is that whoever reported it didn't read the full sign. Since our board meetings are subject to the open meetings act, open and concealed carry is prohibited in the board room during meetings. Open and concealed carry is allowed in the rest of the building during the meeting and anywhere in the building when the rest of the time. tl;dr You can't carry in one room once a month for about an hour. The rest the building and open hours are fair game.."