Legal 30.06?

CHL discussions that do not fit into more specific topics

Moderators: carlson1, Charles L. Cotton

User avatar

Topic author
APynckel
Senior Member
Posts in topic: 9
Posts: 451
Joined: Thu Nov 24, 2011 8:36 am
Location: N Houston

Legal 30.06?

#1

Post by APynckel »

Is this a valid and legal 30.06? Doesn't look like block lettering to me...
Last edited by APynckel on Wed Jan 15, 2014 12:53 pm, edited 1 time in total.
NRA Lifetime Member
User avatar

jmra
Senior Member
Posts in topic: 4
Posts: 10371
Joined: Tue Feb 03, 2009 6:51 am
Location: Ellis County

Re: Legal 30.06?

#2

Post by jmra »

Are you sure you want to argue that before a judge?
Life is tough, but it's tougher when you're stupid.
John Wayne
NRA Lifetime member
User avatar

Topic author
APynckel
Senior Member
Posts in topic: 9
Posts: 451
Joined: Thu Nov 24, 2011 8:36 am
Location: N Houston

Re: Legal 30.06?

#3

Post by APynckel »

jmra wrote:Are you sure you want to argue that before a judge?
I have no intention of violating it, I am merely asking if it's legal.

According to this site,

http://www.burger.com/gunfaq08.htm" onclick="window.open(this.href);return false;
"Written communication" means either:
(1) a card or "other document" that has written language "identical" to the following:

"Pursuant to Section 30.06, Penal Code (trespass by holder of license to carry a concealed handgun), a person licensed under Subchapter H, Chapter 411, Government Code (concealed handgun law), may not enter this property with a concealed handgun;" or

(2) A sign posted on the property that:
(a) "includes" the above language in both English and Spanish;
(b) appears in contrasting colors with block letters at least one inch in height; and
(c) is displayed in a conspicuous manner clearly visible to the public.
... it is in violation due to it not being in 1" block lettering (there is visible capital / lowercase font). I am restricted due to company policy from carrying a weapon inside the building, but someone else could LEGALLY conceal a firearm due to this not being in spec.

.. Or am I wrong?
NRA Lifetime Member
User avatar

MasterOfNone
Senior Member
Posts in topic: 1
Posts: 1276
Joined: Mon Dec 06, 2010 12:00 am
Location: Dallas
Contact:

Re: Legal 30.06?

#4

Post by MasterOfNone »

Block letters do not have to be upper case. Pretty much any font that is sans serif and not script is block letters.
However, the potential issue with using mixed case is the size of the lower case letters. If the capital letters are 1" tall, the lower case letters will likely be about 1/2" or 5/8" tall.
http://www.PersonalPerimeter.com
DFW area LTC Instructor
NRA Pistol Instructor, Range Safety Officer, Recruiter
User avatar

Topic author
APynckel
Senior Member
Posts in topic: 9
Posts: 451
Joined: Thu Nov 24, 2011 8:36 am
Location: N Houston

Re: Legal 30.06?

#5

Post by APynckel »

MasterOfNone wrote:Block letters do not have to be upper case. Pretty much any font that is sans serif and not script is block letters.
However, the potential issue with using mixed case is the size of the lower case letters. If the capital letters are 1" tall, the lower case letters will likely be about 1/2" or 5/8" tall.
I shall go measure them.
NRA Lifetime Member
User avatar

Topic author
APynckel
Senior Member
Posts in topic: 9
Posts: 451
Joined: Thu Nov 24, 2011 8:36 am
Location: N Houston

Re: Legal 30.06?

#6

Post by APynckel »

Confirmed that even the largest letters are not 1" tall.
NRA Lifetime Member
User avatar

RPBrown
Senior Member
Posts in topic: 1
Posts: 5038
Joined: Sun Mar 27, 2005 11:56 am
Location: Irving, Texas

Re: Legal 30.06?

#7

Post by RPBrown »

Legal sign, no. Would I want to argue with a judge about the legalities, again no.
NRA-Benefactor Life member
TSRA-Life member
Image
User avatar

Topic author
APynckel
Senior Member
Posts in topic: 9
Posts: 451
Joined: Thu Nov 24, 2011 8:36 am
Location: N Houston

Re: Legal 30.06?

#8

Post by APynckel »

RPBrown wrote:Legal sign, no. Would I want to argue with a judge about the legalities, again no.
Again...
APynckel wrote:
jmra wrote:Are you sure you want to argue that before a judge?
I have no intention of violating it, I am merely asking if it's legal.
NRA Lifetime Member

Texsquatch
Senior Member
Posts in topic: 3
Posts: 576
Joined: Wed Aug 07, 2013 11:55 pm
Location: Central Texas

Re: Legal 30.06?

#9

Post by Texsquatch »

Is there any case law or articles regardings someone going to court for violating a 30.06 that may not be posted correctly? I did a quick search and didn't see anything good. I'm wondering how people have made out on this type of situation. I know the law is clear on the requirements for posting a 30.06, but if it's a little bit out of spec, I can see a judge upholding the "spirit" of the posting.
User avatar

Topic author
APynckel
Senior Member
Posts in topic: 9
Posts: 451
Joined: Thu Nov 24, 2011 8:36 am
Location: N Houston

Re: Legal 30.06?

#10

Post by APynckel »

Texsquatch wrote:Is there any case law or articles regardings someone going to court for violating a 30.06 that may not be posted correctly? I did a quick search and didn't see anything good. I'm wondering how people have made out on this type of situation. I know the law is clear on the requirements for posting a 30.06, but if it's a little bit out of spec, I can see a judge upholding the "spirit" of the posting.
Law is law, and it's written with specs for a reason. Pretty black and white. A judge ruling in favor of violating law, is equivalent to legislating from the bench, and I know that most people on this forum are opposed to that.
NRA Lifetime Member

Texsquatch
Senior Member
Posts in topic: 3
Posts: 576
Joined: Wed Aug 07, 2013 11:55 pm
Location: Central Texas

Re: Legal 30.06?

#11

Post by Texsquatch »

Yeah, but we know law is open to interpretation, that's what judges & lawers do. I know there's always grey area, so I guess I typically err on the side of caution.
User avatar

Topic author
APynckel
Senior Member
Posts in topic: 9
Posts: 451
Joined: Thu Nov 24, 2011 8:36 am
Location: N Houston

Re: Legal 30.06?

#12

Post by APynckel »

Texsquatch wrote:Yeah, but we know law is open to interpretation, that's what judges & lawers do. I know there's always grey area, so I guess I typically err on the side of caution.
There's no grey area when it specifically states the way you have to post the sign.
NRA Lifetime Member

bbobb
Junior Member
Posts in topic: 2
Posts: 36
Joined: Fri Jan 03, 2014 2:18 pm

Re: Legal 30.06?

#13

Post by bbobb »

If the letters on a sign are too small it is not valid 30.06 notice and concealed is concealed.
User avatar

puma guy
Senior Member
Posts in topic: 4
Posts: 7784
Joined: Thu Jul 23, 2009 2:23 pm
Location: Near San Jacinto

Re: Legal 30.06?

#14

Post by puma guy »

MasterOfNone wrote:Block letters do not have to be upper case. Pretty much any font that is sans serif and not script is block letters.
However, the potential issue with using mixed case is the size of the lower case letters. If the capital letters are 1" tall, the lower case letters will likely be about 1/2" or 5/8" tall.
Block letters are mostly defined as capital. I would argue the meaning in the 30.06 law is for capitals, since it's for a sign. IANaL and can only offer my opinion, but the implication of lower case in the signs would mean they would be required to meet the 1" minimum and uppercase would have to be proportionally larger. There are different applications of the term in printing, and type setting, but "block letters" is synonymous with "block capitals". Having painted signs in my younger days any time block letters were requested it was for capitals.
KAHR PM40/Hoffner IWB and S&W Mod 60/ Galco IWB
NRA Endowment Member, TSRA Life Member,100 Club Life Member,TFC Member
My Faith, My Gun and My Constitution: I cling to all three!

bbobb
Junior Member
Posts in topic: 2
Posts: 36
Joined: Fri Jan 03, 2014 2:18 pm

Re: Legal 30.06?

#15

Post by bbobb »

Seeing how specific that law is, I think if they meant the sign has to be ALL CAPS then that section of the law would have give the example in ALL CAPS.
Post Reply

Return to “General Texas CHL Discussion”