Greg Abbott and OC

CHL discussions that do not fit into more specific topics

Moderators: carlson1, Charles L. Cotton


Salty1
Senior Member
Posts in topic: 1
Posts: 924
Joined: Sun Aug 03, 2008 7:44 pm

Re: Greg Abbott and OC

#16

Post by Salty1 »

My concerns can be summed up in 2 words:

Joe Straus...................
Salty1

ghostrider
Senior Member
Posts in topic: 1
Posts: 1758
Joined: Mon Dec 31, 2007 12:05 am
Location: Free Republic of Texas

Re: Greg Abbott and OC

#17

Post by ghostrider »

OC would be nice as an option (and as a matter of principle) but frankly I have other changes I'd like to see:

# elimination of the 51% rule
# campus carry
NRA Member
Amateur Radio Operator

mr1337
Senior Member
Posts in topic: 8
Posts: 1201
Joined: Thu Apr 03, 2014 12:17 pm
Location: Austin

Re: Greg Abbott and OC

#18

Post by mr1337 »

ghostrider wrote:OC would be nice as an option (and as a matter of principle) but frankly I have other changes I'd like to see:

# elimination of the 51% rule
# campus carry
I agree. I'd rather have 51% repeal and campus carry than open carry, if it came down to the brass like that. Being able to carry in 51% establishments and especially on campus could do more good. Open carry is more of a convenience and freedom. Concealed Carry in more places could (read: WILL) save lives.
Keep calm and carry.

Licensing (n.) - When government takes away your right to do something and sells it back to you.

Bladed
Senior Member
Posts in topic: 4
Posts: 421
Joined: Thu Apr 25, 2013 7:28 pm

Re: Greg Abbott and OC

#19

Post by Bladed »

KD5NRH wrote:
steveincowtown wrote:Yup, but here is what I don't get. Constitutional Carry is part of the Texas Republican platform:

http://www.texasgop.org/wp-content/uplo ... -Final.pdf" onclick="window.open(this.href);return false; (Page 40)

and somehow we can't get anyone to even present a bill for any type of OC?????
It would have to get on to the calendar. That's not going to happen unless we can get one up first requiring the death penalty for legislators who introduce "fluff bills" recognizing people's birthdays and such that run the clock out on actual legislation.
I've done more than my share of complaining about how much time the legislature wastes, and I agree that it's frustrating as hell to be waiting for a floor vote on an important bill and have to sit through ninety minutes of the chamber recognizing wedding anniversaries and little league victories, but it's worth noting that those "fluff" bills are placed on a different calendar than most serious legislation and are typically heard at times when the legislators either don't have much else to work on (i.e., early in the session) or need the delay to work on other things (while one legislator is droning on and on about the local spelling bee champion, his colleagues are actually using that time to get stuff done).

EDITED TO ADD: One of the arguments for switching to annual legislative sessions is that there would be less of a buildup of these types of procedural/formality issues, leaving more time for legislators to address serious legislation. I'm not sure how much validity there is to that claim, but it seems like a relevant footnote to your comment. Also, it should be noted that I've been told legislators use the time during the Local and Consent Calendar to get work done, but having never been a member of or staffer for the Texas Legislature, I'm just reporting secondhand information--for all I know, they're playing solitaire.

victory
Member
Posts in topic: 2
Posts: 148
Joined: Wed Jul 30, 2014 1:00 pm

Re: Greg Abbott and OC

#20

Post by victory »

I would like to see TPC 46.035 repealed. There is no legitimate reason to impose those restrictions on handguns carried by licensed people, when unlicensed people can carry an AR, AK, or riot shotgun without those restrictions.

No reason at all for TPC 46.035 to stay on the books except to pander to Bloomberg and his ilk.
User avatar

LabRat
Senior Member
Posts in topic: 1
Posts: 468
Joined: Sat May 17, 2008 7:38 pm

Re: Greg Abbott and OC

#21

Post by LabRat »

mr1337 wrote:
ghostrider wrote:OC would be nice as an option (and as a matter of principle) but frankly I have other changes I'd like to see:

# elimination of the 51% rule
# campus carry
I agree. I'd rather have 51% repeal and campus carry than open carry, if it came down to the brass like that. Being able to carry in 51% establishments and especially on campus could do more good. Open carry is more of a convenience and freedom. Concealed Carry in more places could (read: WILL) save lives.
I prefer CC. But OC would be nice just as a matter of convenience and the freedom would be good to have back.

But other problems arise with OC......I hate to be superficial, but I'd "need" a better lookin' pistol for OC.
A Wilson Combat or Colt Commander.... :drool:

Man, OC is gonna may cost me some $$$$$ if it passes.

LabRat
This is not legal advice.
People should be able to perform many functions; for others and for themselves. Specialization is for insects. — Robert Heinlein (Severe paraphrase)
User avatar

Beiruty
Senior Member
Posts in topic: 1
Posts: 9655
Joined: Tue Aug 12, 2008 9:22 pm
Location: Allen, Texas

Re: Greg Abbott and OC

#22

Post by Beiruty »

LabRat,
For Open Carry think of
1) SVI Infinity
2) Ed Brown
3) STI
4) Factory engraved Colt
Something like this:
Ed Brown:
Image
Colts Factory Engraved:
Image
Or this Full size:
Image
Beiruty,
United we stand, dispersed we falter
2014: NRA Endowment lifetime member

patterson
Senior Member
Posts in topic: 6
Posts: 543
Joined: Wed Mar 19, 2014 5:51 pm

Re: Greg Abbott and OC

#23

Post by patterson »

Beiruty, those are some sweet 1911s

cb1000rider
Senior Member
Posts in topic: 3
Posts: 2505
Joined: Wed Jun 12, 2013 3:27 pm

Re: Greg Abbott and OC

#24

Post by cb1000rider »

Texsquatch wrote:My biggest concern is what OC may do to impact CHL. Could OC somehow lead to the end of 30.06 and make it easier for places to ban guns? Could it spell out more restrictions?
I'd be interested to see what the bill would look like.
Compare to other states like MI, where open carry is allowed (not legislatively allowed, nor legislatively prohibited) and they have a CHL program. In the MI circumstance, you get both. You get to OC where appropriate (subject to certain restrictions, like TX CHL has), but if you have a CHL many of those restrictions don't apply.....

I for one, think it would likely extend where we are today... But I'm not under the illusion that we could suddenly carry a black rifle into a public area without risking a confrontation.

However, the Abbot key of "when it lands on my desk" to me means that he's not going to spend political capital to make it happen... So saying that doesn't get me excited at all.

steveincowtown
Banned
Posts in topic: 5
Posts: 1374
Joined: Wed Aug 04, 2010 1:58 pm

Re: Greg Abbott and OC

#25

Post by steveincowtown »

Charles L. Cotton wrote:
steveincowtown wrote:. . . we can't get anyone to even present a bill for any type of OC?????
On what do you base this statement?

Chas.

History at this point, but hey I am all :bigear: for next session. Probably would have been worded better as "we haven't been able to" rather than "we can't."
The Time is Now...
NRA Lifetime Member

mr1337
Senior Member
Posts in topic: 8
Posts: 1201
Joined: Thu Apr 03, 2014 12:17 pm
Location: Austin

Re: Greg Abbott and OC

#26

Post by mr1337 »

I won't be looking forward to MDA members and the like SWATing here in Texas if/when OC passes.
Keep calm and carry.

Licensing (n.) - When government takes away your right to do something and sells it back to you.
User avatar

mojo84
Senior Member
Posts in topic: 11
Posts: 9043
Joined: Tue Jun 21, 2011 4:07 pm
Location: Boerne, TX (Kendall County)

Re: Greg Abbott and OC

#27

Post by mojo84 »

mr1337 wrote:I won't be looking forward to MDA members and the like SWATing here in Texas if/when OC passes.
The answer to that is to file charges against those that make a false report.
Note: Me sharing a link and information published by others does not constitute my endorsement, agreement, disagreement, my opinion or publishing by me. If you do not like what is contained at a link I share, take it up with the author or publisher of the content.

mr1337
Senior Member
Posts in topic: 8
Posts: 1201
Joined: Thu Apr 03, 2014 12:17 pm
Location: Austin

Re: Greg Abbott and OC

#28

Post by mr1337 »

mojo84 wrote:
mr1337 wrote:I won't be looking forward to MDA members and the like SWATing here in Texas if/when OC passes.
The answer to that is to file charges against those that make a false report.
Still doesn't fix if anyone is killed in the process, as we've seen in the past.

I really can't wait to see if the SWATer that called 911 on the guy at the gas station gets canned. Or the SWATer from Walmart. Hopefully that will show people that this stuff isn't a game. People can die, and you WILL go to jail.
Keep calm and carry.

Licensing (n.) - When government takes away your right to do something and sells it back to you.
User avatar

mojo84
Senior Member
Posts in topic: 11
Posts: 9043
Joined: Tue Jun 21, 2011 4:07 pm
Location: Boerne, TX (Kendall County)

Re: Greg Abbott and OC

#29

Post by mojo84 »

There is no perfect magic solution to any problem. Got to start somewhere.
Note: Me sharing a link and information published by others does not constitute my endorsement, agreement, disagreement, my opinion or publishing by me. If you do not like what is contained at a link I share, take it up with the author or publisher of the content.
Post Reply

Return to “General Texas CHL Discussion”