30.05 and CHL?
Moderators: carlson1, Charles L. Cotton
-
Topic author - Moderator
- Posts in topic: 4
- Posts: 5404
- Joined: Sun Jan 08, 2006 10:27 am
- Location: DFW
- Contact:
30.05 and CHL?
Sorry for the poor image quality. I only had a cell phone at the time.
What do you think about this? This was at the visitor's center at Burlington Northern RailRoad.
BTW, here is a selected part of 30.05:
PC §30.05. CRIMINAL TRESPASS. (a) A person commits an offense
if he enters or remains on or in property, including an aircraft or other
vehicle, of another without effective consent or he enters or remains in
a building of another without effective consent and he:
(1) had notice that the entry was forbidden; or
(2) received notice to depart but failed to do so....
(f) It is a defense to prosecution under this section that:
(1) the basis on which entry on the property or land or in the
building was forbidden is that entry with a handgun was forbidden; and
(2) the person was carrying a concealed handgun and a license
issued under Subchapter H, Chapter 411, Government Code, to carry
a concealed handgun of the same category the person was carrying.
What do you think about this? This was at the visitor's center at Burlington Northern RailRoad.
BTW, here is a selected part of 30.05:
PC §30.05. CRIMINAL TRESPASS. (a) A person commits an offense
if he enters or remains on or in property, including an aircraft or other
vehicle, of another without effective consent or he enters or remains in
a building of another without effective consent and he:
(1) had notice that the entry was forbidden; or
(2) received notice to depart but failed to do so....
(f) It is a defense to prosecution under this section that:
(1) the basis on which entry on the property or land or in the
building was forbidden is that entry with a handgun was forbidden; and
(2) the person was carrying a concealed handgun and a license
issued under Subchapter H, Chapter 411, Government Code, to carry
a concealed handgun of the same category the person was carrying.
-
- Senior Member
- Posts in topic: 2
- Posts: 993
- Joined: Wed Apr 18, 2007 2:49 pm
- Location: North of Mckinney
-
- Senior Member
- Posts in topic: 2
- Posts: 993
- Joined: Wed Apr 18, 2007 2:49 pm
- Location: North of Mckinney
Looks like a museum. But I have no doubt I could be wrong. It's rare, but it happens. :-D
KBCraig wrote:Agreed, it's not valid.
What kind of place was this that wants visitors to present government ID?
BrassMonkey, that funky monkey....
===========================
Springfield TRP
Glock 22
Glock 21
Walther P22
===========================
Springfield TRP
Glock 22
Glock 21
Walther P22
-
Topic author - Moderator
- Posts in topic: 4
- Posts: 5404
- Joined: Sun Jan 08, 2006 10:27 am
- Location: DFW
- Contact:
This is the BNRR headquarters in Fort Worth. I was there for a service call. And, being the true rebel that I am, you KNOW what government ID I presented to them. They didn't know what to think about that, as apparently, they had not seen one before!KBCraig wrote:Agreed, it's not valid.
What kind of place was this that wants visitors to present government ID?
This is an interesting example. I would only point out that BNRR has their own police department. If they were to discover you carrying on their premesis they could in fact arrest you.
Since the verbage of 30.05 states that it is a "defense to prosecution" that you had your CHL you may very well still take the ride so to speak.
Since the verbage of 30.05 states that it is a "defense to prosecution" that you had your CHL you may very well still take the ride so to speak.
-
- Senior Member
- Posts in topic: 1
- Posts: 6134
- Joined: Wed Jan 12, 2005 1:31 pm
- Location: Allen, TX
-
- Junior Member
- Posts in topic: 3
- Posts: 10
- Joined: Wed Apr 04, 2007 1:41 am
- Location: Saginaw, TX
Re: 30.05 and CHL?
I work there! I agree that it does not seem like a legal sign but have decided I am not going to test it!! LOL I think this week I will ask one of the Special Agents what they think of it.llwatson wrote:Sorry for the poor image quality. I only had a cell phone at the time.
What do you think about this? This was at the visitor's center at Burlington Northern RailRoad.
BTW, here is a selected part of 30.05:
PC §30.05. CRIMINAL TRESPASS. (a) A person commits an offense
if he enters or remains on or in property, including an aircraft or other
vehicle, of another without effective consent or he enters or remains in
a building of another without effective consent and he:
(1) had notice that the entry was forbidden; or
(2) received notice to depart but failed to do so....
(f) It is a defense to prosecution under this section that:
(1) the basis on which entry on the property or land or in the
building was forbidden is that entry with a handgun was forbidden; and
(2) the person was carrying a concealed handgun and a license
issued under Subchapter H, Chapter 411, Government Code, to carry
a concealed handgun of the same category the person was carrying.
-
- Senior Member
- Posts in topic: 1
- Posts: 7590
- Joined: Fri Mar 04, 2005 11:17 pm
- Location: 77504
Re: 30.05 and CHL?
They have "special agents"???StingRay wrote:I think this week I will ask one of the Special Agents what they think of it.
Uh oh...
Bet they have shoe phones and everything...
"Perseverance and Preparedness triumph over Procrastination and Paranoia every time.” -- Steve
NRA - Life Member
"Quis custodiet ipsos custodes?"
Μολών λαβέ!
NRA - Life Member
"Quis custodiet ipsos custodes?"
Μολών λαβέ!
-
- Junior Member
- Posts in topic: 3
- Posts: 10
- Joined: Wed Apr 04, 2007 1:41 am
- Location: Saginaw, TX
Re: 30.05 and CHL?
The Official company title for a Railroad Police Officer is Special Agent...not sure where it comes from but am sure it is somewhere in railroad history. Been working for the railroad for 26 years and haven't thought much about it.stevie_d_64 wrote:They have "special agents"???StingRay wrote:I think this week I will ask one of the Special Agents what they think of it.
Uh oh...
Bet they have shoe phones and everything...