Wives question of liability.

CHL discussions that do not fit into more specific topics

Moderators: carlson1, Charles L. Cotton


Topic author
Brett2413
Junior Member
Posts in topic: 2
Posts: 2
Joined: Fri Mar 22, 2013 8:30 am

Wives question of liability.

#1

Post by Brett2413 »

My wife had a question this weekend after I had to walk back to the truck to disarm.
She asked me if I had heard any discussion of legal liability, or heard of anyone holding the owners of an establishment liable for making someone disarm before entering said establishment and then have a shooter come in and the CHL not able to defend himself or anyone else.
This all came up after having to disarm before entering IKEA, she has gotten used to me being armed and feels safer when I am, she said it gave her kind of an odd feeling watching me make the walk back to the truck and walking around knowing I could do nothing to protect her from a shooter.
What say those smarter than I.
User avatar

jmra
Senior Member
Posts in topic: 2
Posts: 10371
Joined: Tue Feb 03, 2009 6:51 am
Location: Ellis County

Re: Wives question of liability.

#2

Post by jmra »

Just need a victim to sue someone so we have a test case.
Life is tough, but it's tougher when you're stupid.
John Wayne
NRA Lifetime member
User avatar

RPBrown
Senior Member
Posts in topic: 2
Posts: 5038
Joined: Sun Mar 27, 2005 11:56 am
Location: Irving, Texas

Re: Wives question of liability.

#3

Post by RPBrown »

I do not know of any case law of civil liability. I am sure at some point there will be a law suit to establish a precident though.
NRA-Benefactor Life member
TSRA-Life member
Image
User avatar

cmwoodruff
Member
Posts in topic: 1
Posts: 62
Joined: Sat May 04, 2013 7:45 pm
Location: Grand Prairie, TX

Re: Wives question of liability.

#4

Post by cmwoodruff »

Brett2413 wrote:My wife had a question this weekend after I had to walk back to the truck to disarm.
She asked me if I had heard any discussion of legal liability, or heard of anyone holding the owners of an establishment liable for making someone disarm before entering said establishment and then have a shooter come in and the CHL not able to defend himself or anyone else.
This all came up after having to disarm before entering IKEA, she has gotten used to me being armed and feels safer when I am, she said it gave her kind of an odd feeling watching me make the walk back to the truck and walking around knowing I could do nothing to protect her from a shooter.
What say those smarter than I.

Legally, I have no idea.. I know that they aren't forcing you to be there though. You are free to go elsewhere.
My thoughts though.. I think if they go out of their way to tell you that you aren't allowed to have it, then they should assume responsibility for the safety of their customers. If you are put in a situation where they have created an unsafe environment, I would say that they should be held responsible. Not sure how it would go legally...
“How fortunate for leaders that men do not think.” -Adolf Hitler
User avatar

RPBrown
Senior Member
Posts in topic: 2
Posts: 5038
Joined: Sun Mar 27, 2005 11:56 am
Location: Irving, Texas

Re: Wives question of liability.

#5

Post by RPBrown »

cmwoodruff wrote:
Brett2413 wrote:My wife had a question this weekend after I had to walk back to the truck to disarm.
She asked me if I had heard any discussion of legal liability, or heard of anyone holding the owners of an establishment liable for making someone disarm before entering said establishment and then have a shooter come in and the CHL not able to defend himself or anyone else.
This all came up after having to disarm before entering IKEA, she has gotten used to me being armed and feels safer when I am, she said it gave her kind of an odd feeling watching me make the walk back to the truck and walking around knowing I could do nothing to protect her from a shooter.
What say those smarter than I.

Legally, I have no idea.. I know that they aren't forcing you to be there though. You are free to go elsewhere.
My thoughts though.. I think if they go out of their way to tell you that you aren't allowed to have it, then they should assume responsibility for the safety of their customers. If you are put in a situation where they have created an unsafe environment, I would say that they should be held responsible. Not sure how it would go legally...

My thoughts are that it is the same liability as if a mirror fell off of the wall and hit you. Just my .02
NRA-Benefactor Life member
TSRA-Life member
Image

gthaustex
Senior Member
Posts in topic: 1
Posts: 1318
Joined: Fri Jul 27, 2012 9:38 am

Re: Wives question of liability.

#6

Post by gthaustex »

Brett2413 wrote: This all came up after having to disarm before entering IKEA.
That is the exact reason why I will never go there. They choose to post 30.06, I choose to not shop there.

Topic author
Brett2413
Junior Member
Posts in topic: 2
Posts: 2
Joined: Fri Mar 22, 2013 8:30 am

Re: Wives question of liability.

#7

Post by Brett2413 »

gthaustex wrote:
Brett2413 wrote: This all came up after having to disarm before entering IKEA.
That is the exact reason why I will never go there. They choose to post 30.06, I choose to not shop there.

I understand, but the wife wanted to look for something she saw on an add....she asked me while we were walking around,"Why would they not want someone here that could provide protection if needed?" I told her you can't fix stupid.
User avatar

txglock21
Senior Member
Posts in topic: 2
Posts: 772
Joined: Sun Feb 24, 2013 11:39 am
Location: Garland, TX.

Re: Wives question of liability.

#8

Post by txglock21 »

The one time we went to IKEA I was unaware of their no gun policy. Saw the 30.06, turned around and headed for car. My wife said "where are you going?" I told her if she wanted to still go in I would wait in the car. She was in about 15 minutes and came back and said she would never go back there. I said good because if she was ever coming back, it would be without me! Since I've had my CHL, IKEA and a major hospital are the only two valid 30.06 signs I've seen in person. If I ever do see another, I will not go in and not go back. I'm sure they don't care about one lost customer, but I refuse to support any business that puts my life in danger by trying to unarm me! :patriot:
"Laugh about everything or cry about nothing."
NRA Life Member & TSRA Member/ Former USAF

TXRuger2013
Junior Member
Posts in topic: 1
Posts: 7
Joined: Tue Feb 12, 2013 9:41 am

Re: Wives question of liability.

#9

Post by TXRuger2013 »

Where was the Ikea located? The Ikea in Frisco does not have a 30.06 sign posted, or I must have missed it.
User avatar

mewalke
Senior Member
Posts in topic: 2
Posts: 293
Joined: Mon Apr 01, 2013 10:39 am
Location: Denton County, TX

Re: Wives question of liability.

#10

Post by mewalke »

TXRuger2013 wrote:Where was the Ikea located? The Ikea in Frisco does not have a 30.06 sign posted, or I must have missed it.
If my poor memory serves me right the Frisco location does have a 30.06 sign posted - but I really had to look for it. I only remember because I had a discussion with my wife that I wouldn't be able to carry in the store once I got my CHL.

knotquiteawake
Senior Member
Posts in topic: 1
Posts: 772
Joined: Thu Jul 07, 2011 9:18 am
Location: Rowlett, TX

Re: Wives question of liability.

#11

Post by knotquiteawake »

mewalke wrote:
TXRuger2013 wrote:Where was the Ikea located? The Ikea in Frisco does not have a 30.06 sign posted, or I must have missed it.
If my poor memory serves me right the Frisco location does have a 30.06 sign posted - but I really had to look for it. I only remember because I had a discussion with my wife that I wouldn't be able to carry in the store once I got my CHL.

Last time I was at the Frisco location, which was about a year ago, they only had gunbuster signs. I think the one in Houston though does have the correct signage.

SRH78
Senior Member
Posts in topic: 1
Posts: 513
Joined: Thu Dec 15, 2011 8:53 pm

Re: Wives question of liability.

#12

Post by SRH78 »

I don't recall seeing 30.06 signs at the one in Frisco.

DocV
Senior Member
Posts in topic: 1
Posts: 1127
Joined: Fri Nov 25, 2011 4:29 pm

Re: Wives question of liability.

#13

Post by DocV »

jmra wrote:Just need a victim to sue someone so we have a test case.
I had the meatballs. Is that victim enough?

MamaK
Member
Posts in topic: 1
Posts: 89
Joined: Wed Apr 17, 2013 6:57 pm

Re: Wives question of liability.

#14

Post by MamaK »

I haven't yet found any case law =/ but I did find these.

http://www.myfoxhouston.com/story/18661 ... z1yHxsVyFn" onclick="window.open(this.href);return false;
CHL holder fired shot that killed store clerk.

CHl holder killed at COstco
http://www.mynews4.com/news/story/Famil ... qeD8w.cspx" onclick="window.open(this.href);return false;

Pharmacist Fired For Self Defense SHooting at Walgreens
http://www.gunsandammo.com/2011/09/22/w ... s-robbery/" onclick="window.open(this.href);return false;
Post Reply

Return to “General Texas CHL Discussion”