Carry No More

CHL discussions that do not fit into more specific topics

Moderators: carlson1, Charles L. Cotton

User avatar

Kadelic
Senior Member
Posts in topic: 3
Posts: 215
Joined: Fri Feb 17, 2012 1:42 pm
Location: Duncanville, TX

Re: Carry No More

#46

Post by Kadelic »

kP380 wrote:I often feel the way the OP does...I try to carry as often as I can, but the statistical odds make me wonder sometimes...
It's kind of like playing the lottery. The odds are extremely long, and you've got to be in it to win it, but someone is going to win eventually. The thing with real life is that you've automatically bought a ticket every day you wake up. Nobody expects to "win" but if my number does come up I'd rather be packing than not, all things considered. Take my analogy with a grain (or shaker) of salt though, I'm still waiting on my plastic so I've never carried.
Honor Necessity
User avatar

jimlongley
Senior Member
Posts in topic: 1
Posts: 6134
Joined: Wed Jan 12, 2005 1:31 pm
Location: Allen, TX

Re: Carry No More

#47

Post by jimlongley »

PrideAndJoy54 wrote:Thank you to everyone who responded... both supportive and critical.

To clarify, I am not afraid to defend myself or my loved ones from an attacker. And I am not fearful of prosecution for anyplace I may or may not have carried. And I am not afraid of the responsibility of carrying.

I am concerned about police over reaction during a routine traffic stop or an accidental un-concealing while shopping... like the late Erik Scott. I am concerned about over zealous prosecutors and anti-gun judges. I am concerned about the legal nightmare that is likely after a SD shooting, not even to mention the possible civil suits following a criminal case. Perhaps I should have read up on all of that before jumping through the hoops to get my CHL, but I did not and that is where I am now, like it or not.

I do believe that the likelihood of having to defend myself outside of my home with deadly force is less than the likelihood of unjust persecution. But, to be crystal clear, I am not advocating that ANYONE follow my lead... every man must decide for himself what his personal situation requires.

All of that said... I did carry yesterday. The supportive and critical replies to my original post were read, considered and appreciated.
Just because you are paranoid, does not mean they are not after you.
Real gun control, carrying 24/7/365
User avatar

74novaman
Senior Member
Posts in topic: 4
Posts: 3798
Joined: Wed Feb 18, 2009 7:36 am
Location: CenTex

Re: Carry No More

#48

Post by 74novaman »

PrideAndJoy54 wrote:Thank you to everyone who responded... both supportive and critical.

To clarify, I am not afraid to defend myself or my loved ones from an attacker. And I am not fearful of prosecution for anyplace I may or may not have carried. And I am not afraid of the responsibility of carrying.

All of that said... I did carry yesterday. The supportive and critical replies to my original post were read, considered and appreciated.
Thanks for coming back and expanding on your position a bit more.

I would encourage you to look for cases in Texas where a CHL holder in a justified shoot was dragged over the coals in court...

I think you'll be pleasantly surprised at the lack of cases you're able to find. :tiphat:
TANSTAAFL
User avatar

03Lightningrocks
Senior Member
Posts in topic: 4
Posts: 11453
Joined: Tue Apr 08, 2008 5:15 pm
Location: Plano

Re: Carry No More

#49

Post by 03Lightningrocks »

I will throw in one more item of importance. Don't believe everything you read on these gun forums. Many times the posters are living vicariously through other posters on varying forums. More than a few times I have read posts made here that were posted in other places by other posters. Many times years before. My point is, the stories of police harrassment of legitimate CHL holders are mostly rehashed from other internet forums. It is VERY RARE to be harrassed by the police over legally carrying a firearm. Same goes for being outed. Many of those stories are also rehashed for effect and burped out here to make for conversation. Google some of them and you will laugh. Carry your weapon with no worry of police harrassment. It is not going to happen. The cops don't know you have a gun as long as it is concealed. They don't have x-ray vision.
User avatar

03Lightningrocks
Senior Member
Posts in topic: 4
Posts: 11453
Joined: Tue Apr 08, 2008 5:15 pm
Location: Plano

Re: Carry No More

#50

Post by 03Lightningrocks »

74novaman wrote:
PrideAndJoy54 wrote:Thank you to everyone who responded... both supportive and critical.

To clarify, I am not afraid to defend myself or my loved ones from an attacker. And I am not fearful of prosecution for anyplace I may or may not have carried. And I am not afraid of the responsibility of carrying.

All of that said... I did carry yesterday. The supportive and critical replies to my original post were read, considered and appreciated.
Thanks for coming back and expanding on your position a bit more.

I would encourage you to look for cases in Texas where a CHL holder in a justified shoot was dragged over the coals in court...

I think you'll be pleasantly surprised at the lack of cases you're able to find. :tiphat:
FACT!!!! :iagree: :thumbs2:

RPB
Banned
Posts in topic: 5
Posts: 8697
Joined: Tue Nov 17, 2009 8:17 pm

Re: Carry No More

#51

Post by RPB »

03Lightningrocks wrote:I will throw in one more item of importance. Don't believe everything you read on these gun forums. Many times the posters are living vicariously through other posters on varying forums. More than a few times I have read posts made here that were posted in other places by other posters. Many times years before. My point is, the stories of police harrassment of legitimate CHL holders are mostly rehashed from other internet forums. It is VERY RARE to be harrassed by the police over legally carrying a firearm. Same goes for being outed. Many of those stories are also rehashed for effect and burped out here to make for conversation. Google some of them and you will laugh. Carry your weapon with no worry of police harrassment. It is not going to happen. The cops don't know you have a gun as long as it is concealed. They don't have x-ray vision.
It must be true if I read it on the Internets. :mrgreen:

Statistical odds:
It's true that it's unlikely that a gun will ever be needed (hopefully)
When I quit smoking, the risk of fire in the house was lowered, I recall 2 fires, one from a faulty extension cord, one from some alcohol based hand cleaner which ignited, and no one knows how. ... I keep a fire extinguisher though.
I have had flats on 3 occasions over 50 years. I rarely have a flat tire, but I waste gas hauling around the weight of a jack and a spare anyway.
Stores I was in were robbed by gunmen on 2 occasions back in the 1970s. Statistically, I'll probably never ever need my gun, but I haul it around anyway because as with the other tools listed above, I'd rather have it.
Besides, hauling around the extra weight here in the hill country keeps my legs in shape so as I age, I'll be able to walk longer hopefully, my niece "borrowed" my leg weights years ago.
I know a deacon CHL who carries in his cars, un-chambered due to grandkids he totes around, but doesn't carry on body. I know a retired LEO CHL who owns well over a hundred 1911s, goes to all gun shows, but rarely carries a loaded gun (due to weight and clothing choices he hasn't adapted yet.... he just recently, after being licensed for years, started pocket carrying a P238.

I moved to the country, no real fear of being robbed of home invaders (though a violent criminal home invader with 3 life sentences escaped last week and was found blocks away) and no fear of being arrested for carrying,... police here pretty much wish everyone was armed and carried a spare magazine (of the type they carry) ... just in case on a lonely farm road they need help). I still see rabid skunks, a porcupine in the front yard or a rattlesnake or wild boar sometimes, haven't needed my gun, nor fire extinguisher nor spare tire and jack, but I feel undressed if I leave the house without them .... I used to feel that way if I left the house without a comb for my hair too ... time and baldness cures that one. ;-) The odds of me needing a comb now .... well ...
Thanks for coming back and expanding on your position a bit more.

I would encourage you to look for cases in Texas where a CHL holder in a justified shoot was dragged over the coals in court...

I think you'll be pleasantly surprised at the lack of cases you're able to find.
:iagree:
Last edited by RPB on Sun Mar 11, 2012 6:22 pm, edited 1 time in total.
I'm no lawyer

"Never show your hole card" "Always have something in reserve"

Heartland Patriot

Re: Carry No More

#52

Post by Heartland Patriot »

03Lightningrocks wrote:I will throw in one more item of importance. Don't believe everything you read on these gun forums. Many times the posters are living vicariously through other posters on varying forums. More than a few times I have read posts made here that were posted in other places by other posters. Many times years before. My point is, the stories of police harrassment of legitimate CHL holders are mostly rehashed from other internet forums. It is VERY RARE to be harrassed by the police over legally carrying a firearm. Same goes for being outed. Many of those stories are also rehashed for effect and burped out here to make for conversation. Google some of them and you will laugh. Carry your weapon with no worry of police harrassment. It is not going to happen. The cops don't know you have a gun as long as it is concealed. They don't have x-ray vision.
:iagree:

Good looking out...

steve817
Senior Member
Posts in topic: 1
Posts: 543
Joined: Sun May 16, 2010 1:44 pm
Location: Arlington

Re: Carry No More

#53

Post by steve817 »

PrideAndJoy54 wrote:Thank you to everyone who responded... both supportive and critical.

To clarify, I am not afraid to defend myself or my loved ones from an attacker. And I am not fearful of prosecution for anyplace I may or may not have carried. And I am not afraid of the responsibility of carrying.

I am concerned about police over reaction during a routine traffic stop or an accidental un-concealing while shopping... like the late Erik Scott. I am concerned about over zealous prosecutors and anti-gun judges. I am concerned about the legal nightmare that is likely after a SD shooting, not even to mention the possible civil suits following a criminal case. Perhaps I should have read up on all of that before jumping through the hoops to get my CHL, but I did not and that is where I am now, like it or not.

I do believe that the likelihood of having to defend myself outside of my home with deadly force is less than the likelihood of unjust persecution. But, to be crystal clear, I am not advocating that ANYONE follow my lead... every man must decide for himself what his personal situation requires.

All of that said... I did carry yesterday. The supportive and critical replies to my original post were read, considered and appreciated.
That depends on where in the state you live. Here in Arlington, the police officers that I have spoken to have been nothing but supportive.
"Freedom is never more than one generation away from extinction. We didn't pass it to our children in the bloodstream. It must be fought for, protected, and handed on for them to do the same.."
-- Ronald Reagan
User avatar

gdanaher
Banned
Posts in topic: 2
Posts: 670
Joined: Tue Nov 30, 2010 8:38 am
Location: EM12

Re: Carry No More

#54

Post by gdanaher »

Can anyone provide factual or anecdotal examples of Texas LEO actions which would precipitate the feelings the OP has expressed? Sometimes we forget that Texas also begins at the state line, that this is not California, and no, the LAPD does not instruct our officers how to behave in public.

RPB
Banned
Posts in topic: 5
Posts: 8697
Joined: Tue Nov 17, 2009 8:17 pm

Re: Carry No More

#55

Post by RPB »

If accidentally un-concealing is a big concern ... one can always get a different setup/equipment.
I'd be super-surprised if anyone could spot a pocket carried Seecamp, in .380 which is what I'd carry if Campus Carry passed and a school made a "policy" that they'd expel licensed a person found carrying.
Image
lots of types of holsters for it
http://www.google.com/search?q=seecamp& ... 24&bih=636" onclick="window.open(this.href);return false;
Image
http://www.seecamp.com/" onclick="window.open(this.href);return false;
Alternate to Seecamp is
MPA Protector
http://www.tacticalgearmag.com/page/sma ... istols-for" onclick="window.open(this.href);return false;
Last edited by RPB on Sun Mar 11, 2012 6:56 pm, edited 2 times in total.
I'm no lawyer

"Never show your hole card" "Always have something in reserve"
User avatar

Lambda Force
Senior Member
Posts in topic: 2
Posts: 600
Joined: Sun Oct 09, 2011 3:18 pm

Re: Carry No More

#56

Post by Lambda Force »

gdanaher wrote:Can anyone provide factual or anecdotal examples of Texas LEO actions which would precipitate the feelings the OP has expressed? Sometimes we forget that Texas also begins at the state line, that this is not California, and no, the LAPD does not instruct our officers how to behave in public.
I don't want to scare the OP but here's one from 2 years ago. viewtopic.php?f=7&t=31719&start=270" onclick="window.open(this.href);return false;

There also many stories of people being arbitrarily and capriciously disarmed because they showed their CHL. If they were carrying under MPA instead and kept their mouth shut like MPA allows, they wouldn't have been disarmed. There are also stories of people who had a CHL and weren't carrying so the law doesn't require them to show (or even carry) their CHL, and the cop hassled them because they didn't display the card. In a few cases, the bully said things that were borderline threats or even outright threats. Those stories are a good argument for not getting a Texas license.

Like steve817 said, it depends where you live. Some parts of Texas are still Texas, but some have more in common with NY or LA or Mexico City than the United States. There's also the risk of showing up on the radar of someone cut from the same cloth as Daniel Harless. :shock:
Last edited by Lambda Force on Sun Mar 11, 2012 7:19 pm, edited 1 time in total.
Tyranny is identified by what is legal for government employees but illegal for the citizenry.
User avatar

gdanaher
Banned
Posts in topic: 2
Posts: 670
Joined: Tue Nov 30, 2010 8:38 am
Location: EM12

Re: Carry No More

#57

Post by gdanaher »

RPB wrote:If accidentally un-concealing is a big concern ... one can always get a different setup/equipment.
I'd be super-surprised if anyone could spot a pocket carried Seecamp, in .380 which is what I'd carry if Campus Carry passed and a school made a "policy" that they'd expel licensed a person found carrying.
Image
lots of types of holsters for it
http://www.google.com/search?q=seecamp& ... 24&bih=636" onclick="window.open(this.href);return false;
Image
http://www.seecamp.com/" onclick="window.open(this.href);return false;
Alternate to Seecamp is
MPA Protector
http://www.tacticalgearmag.com/page/sma ... istols-for" onclick="window.open(this.href);return false;

That pistol looks strangely like those produced awhile back by various companies, the last I know of being Jimenez. They were cast out of zinc. previous company was put out of budiness in California after a law suit for their product exploding in an owner's face and blinding him. Same product,. different name??

Also, if you own a small pistol, take a look at Sneeky Pete Holsters. It looks like a Blackberry case but holds my P238 just fine.

RPB
Banned
Posts in topic: 5
Posts: 8697
Joined: Tue Nov 17, 2009 8:17 pm

Re: Carry No More

#58

Post by RPB »

There's a world of difference in a Stainless Steel Seecamp .32 ($500-ish) http://www.buytelescopes.com/Products/1 ... ndard.aspx" onclick="window.open(this.href);return false;
or .380 ($850-ish, but a couple years ago they were $1,200 on Gunbroker) http://www.gunsamerica.com/928360769/Gu ... 380acp.htm" onclick="window.open(this.href);return false;
and a $100 Pot metal Jimenez
I got my Seecamps in the 80s before LW died, when each was still hand made, they may still be.
Used to be a 6 month wait while he made yours after you ordered it.
Read about L W Seecamp, you'll see.

There's other pocket carry options if Seecamp is too expensive, but it sets a standard for quality/size.
I'm no lawyer

"Never show your hole card" "Always have something in reserve"
User avatar

drjoker
Banned
Posts in topic: 1
Posts: 1315
Joined: Sun Oct 18, 2009 12:19 am

Re: Carry No More

#59

Post by drjoker »

even if it is true that you may unintentionally carry somewhere you shouldn't and then get in trouble, you should still do it and go to court to defend the constitution and your human right to self defense. the constitution is what makes america great and free. it is worth fighting for.

that said, carrying a gun is a big responsibility and not everyone is up to it. best of luck to ya....
User avatar

kjolly
Senior Member
Posts in topic: 1
Posts: 515
Joined: Tue Dec 21, 2010 10:00 am

Re: Carry No More

#60

Post by kjolly »

Lots of responsiblities in CHL carry. I can understand your concerns however mine is I want to be the one going home and the one to protect my family from home. If I've done something wrong or just dumb I stand ready to pay the price for the benefit of keeping family safe.
Texas CHL Instructor, NRA Certified Trainer, IDPA
NRA Range Safety Officer

http://www.tacticalpistol.us
Post Reply

Return to “General Texas CHL Discussion”