the actual law for...

CHL discussions that do not fit into more specific topics

Moderators: carlson1, Charles L. Cotton

User avatar

seamusTX
Senior Member
Posts in topic: 9
Posts: 13551
Joined: Fri May 12, 2006 12:04 pm
Location: Galveston

Re: the actual law for...

#31

Post by seamusTX »

57Coastie wrote:"why can't computer instructions be written for idiots, with pictures? Might there be a little job protection at play here, too?" ;-)
I can answer that from a professional point of view, since I write computer documentation for a living.

We work under a set of assumptions about users that consistently prove to be overoptimistic, and the cost of customer support on account of that is high.

There are two excellent series of books titled The Complete Idiot's Guide to .... and ... for Dummies, which are written by people who have no direct relationship with computer manufacturers or software publishers.

- Jim
User avatar

seamusTX
Senior Member
Posts in topic: 9
Posts: 13551
Joined: Fri May 12, 2006 12:04 pm
Location: Galveston

Re: the actual law for...

#32

Post by seamusTX »

ELB wrote:I have to quibble a bit with Seamus/Jim on two points (as I have quibbled before ;-) ). Point the first: while almost all the examples I have found WRT to prosecutions of the most recent GFSZA are indeed as part of prosecution of greater crimes (e.g. drug dealing), I do not believe that means it would never be prosecuted against someone's whose gun possession came to police notice in a less criminal way -- say a teacher or parent who parked in a high school parking lot who got ratted out by someone unhappy with them (and the teacher or parent does not have a CHL or other GFSZA exception). It would depend on how interested the police and the federal jurisdiction are in making an example. It is not a risk I would run lightly.
Your point is worth considering, for the person who does not want to risk federal prosecution.

At the same time, I regard this law as a monstrosity. It makes most of the area of most cities off-limits to most otherwise legal uses of firearms; and it is nearly impossible to know if one is violating it. How can you know if you are within 1,000 feet of school property in an area that you are not familiar with? Simply driving through town on an interstate would put you in multiple school zones.

Someday it has to be struck down or repealed.

- Jim

57Coastie

Re: the actual law for...

#33

Post by 57Coastie »

seamusTX wrote: We work under a set of assumptions about users that consistently prove to be overoptimistic, and the cost of customer support on account of that is high.

- Jim
Aha, Jim, my suspicion proves to be correct. :mrgreen:

I must take the 5th before drawing a lawyer parallel for this one. ;-)

Jim, too

57Coastie

Re: the actual law for...

#34

Post by 57Coastie »

seamusTX wrote: At the same time, I regard this law as a monstrosity. It makes most of the area of most cities off-limits to most otherwise legal uses of firearms; and it is nearly impossible to know if one is violating it. How can you know if you are within 1,000 feet of school property in an area that you are not familiar with?

- Jim
You can get a real good deal on a GPS as we get close to Christmas, Jim. :smilelol5:

Jim, too
Post Reply

Return to “General Texas CHL Discussion”