https://texasattorneygeneral.gov/news/r ... ry-lawsuitAttorney General Ken Paxton today lauded a federal court decision to dismiss a complaint by three professors at the University of Texas at Austin regarding Senate Bill 11, the campus carry law. In their lawsuit, the professors claimed that the legislation passed by the Texas Legislature would have a “chilling effect” and stifle class discussion in their courses.
TX: Fed Judge Dismisses UT Profs Campus Carry Lawsuito
Moderators: carlson1, Charles L. Cotton
-
Topic author - Senior Member
- Posts in topic: 2
- Posts: 8128
- Joined: Tue May 22, 2007 9:34 pm
- Location: Seguin
TX: Fed Judge Dismisses UT Profs Campus Carry Lawsuito
USAF 1982-2005
____________
____________
-
- Banned
- Posts in topic: 1
- Posts: 903
- Joined: Wed Oct 03, 2007 1:45 pm
- Location: Houston, Republic of Texas
- Contact:
Re: TX: Fed Judge Dismisses UT Profs Campus Carry Lawsuito
Some good news out of a federal court.
God and the soldier we adore,
In times of danger, not before.
The danger gone, the trouble righted,
God's forgotten, the soldier slighted.
In times of danger, not before.
The danger gone, the trouble righted,
God's forgotten, the soldier slighted.
-
- Senior Member
- Posts in topic: 1
- Posts: 1335
- Joined: Mon Jan 05, 2015 1:17 pm
Re: TX: Fed Judge Dismisses UT Profs Campus Carry Lawsuito
They sued the university president? Bet that showed him what up-and-comers those professors are!
Re: TX: Fed Judge Dismisses UT Profs Campus Carry Lawsuito
How 'chilling' would a concealed firearm be or is OC going to be allowed?
(obviously I'm not well versed in this subject...)
(obviously I'm not well versed in this subject...)
-
- Senior Member
- Posts in topic: 1
- Posts: 867
- Joined: Fri May 24, 2013 9:55 am
Re: TX: Fed Judge Dismisses UT Profs Campus Carry Lawsuito
Now they don't know if there could be a person who legally has a handgun there so they must now be careful about what they say in case said handgun decides to go off. Because nobody ever carried a gun illegally anywhere...Abraham wrote:How 'chilling' would a concealed firearm be or is OC going to be allowed?
(obviously I'm not well versed in this subject...)
-
- Senior Member
- Posts in topic: 2
- Posts: 26850
- Joined: Wed Jan 16, 2008 12:59 pm
- Location: North Richland Hills, Texas
- Contact:
Re: TX: Fed Judge Dismisses UT Profs Campus Carry Lawsuito
Let me get this straight..... They were suing the university president? What the heck did he have to do with passing the law? He was probably against it!
And these people have degrees and are employed to teach?
Jesus wept.
And these people have degrees and are employed to teach?
Jesus wept.
“Hard times create strong men. Strong men create good times. Good times create weak men. And, weak men create hard times.”
― G. Michael Hopf, "Those Who Remain"
#TINVOWOOT
― G. Michael Hopf, "Those Who Remain"
#TINVOWOOT
-
- Senior Member
- Posts in topic: 2
- Posts: 26850
- Joined: Wed Jan 16, 2008 12:59 pm
- Location: North Richland Hills, Texas
- Contact:
Re: TX: Fed Judge Dismisses UT Profs Campus Carry Lawsuito
Campus Carry does not allow OC, requiring that the gun be concealed.Abraham wrote:How 'chilling' would a concealed firearm be or is OC going to be allowed?
(obviously I'm not well versed in this subject...)
“Hard times create strong men. Strong men create good times. Good times create weak men. And, weak men create hard times.”
― G. Michael Hopf, "Those Who Remain"
#TINVOWOOT
― G. Michael Hopf, "Those Who Remain"
#TINVOWOOT
Re: TX: Fed Judge Dismisses UT Profs Campus Carry Lawsuito
The UT President was sued (in addition to the State/AG and UT Board of Regents) because they were claiming that he had authority under the law to declare classrooms a gun exclusion zone or to delegate that authority to individual professors. That was just one of the many baseless claims they made in their complaint.The Annoyed Man wrote:Let me get this straight..... They were suing the university president? What the heck did he have to do with passing the law? He was probably against it!
Article: Federal judge throws out effort by UT professors to overturn campus carry
Hicks, who had not yet conferred with his clients when reached Friday, said he is not sure what course of action he and the plaintiffs will take. They have 28 days from July 6 to ask Yeakel for clarification and 30 days to file an appeal to the U.S. 5th Circuit Court of Appeals.
-
- Senior Member
- Posts in topic: 2
- Posts: 5350
- Joined: Tue Jan 19, 2016 4:23 pm
- Location: Johnson County, Texas
Re: TX: Fed Judge Dismisses UT Profs Campus Carry Lawsuito
What's even better, is that it will be a year, in August, since Campus Carry went into effect, and not one reported instance of anyone being shot on UT campus. The longer it goes, the more rediculous their argument becomes.
Take away the Second first, and the First is gone in a second
-
- Senior Member
- Posts in topic: 1
- Posts: 647
- Joined: Tue Jan 17, 2017 7:12 pm
Re: TX: Fed Judge Dismisses UT Profs Campus Carry Lawsuito
Why can these ivory tower princesses sue the UT President and Board of Regents over campus carry but we can't sue the Mayor and Police Chief when a city posts 30.06 signs?
This is my opinion. There are many like it, but this one is mine.
Re: TX: Fed Judge Dismisses UT Profs Campus Carry Lawsuito
No award of attorney's fees against the plaintiffs?...
Please know and follow the rules of firearms safety.
-
- Senior Member
- Posts in topic: 1
- Posts: 2046
- Joined: Thu Feb 21, 2013 9:03 pm
- Location: East Texas
Re: TX: Fed Judge Dismisses UT Profs Campus Carry Lawsuito
Great news.
2/26-Mailed paper app and packet.
5/20-Plastic in hand.
83 days mailbox to mailbox.
5/20-Plastic in hand.
83 days mailbox to mailbox.
Re: TX: Fed Judge Dismisses UT Profs Campus Carry Lawsuito
No attorney's fees, just other costs. From the final judgement:dlh wrote:No award of attorney's fees against the plaintiffs?...
Here's what Fed. R. Civ. P. 54(d)(1) says:IT IS ORDERED that Defendants, the prevailing parties in this action, shall recover their allowable costs incurred in this action. See Fed. R. Civ. P. 54(d)(1).
However, the AG and/or UT might be able to file a motion to ask for attorney's fees:(1) Costs Other Than Attorney's Fees. Unless a federal statute, these rules, or a court order provides otherwise, costs—other than attorney's fees—should be allowed to the prevailing party. But costs against the United States, its officers, and its agencies may be imposed only to the extent allowed by law. The clerk may tax costs on 14 days’ notice. On motion served within the next 7 days, the court may review the clerk's action.
(2) Attorney's Fees.
(A) Claim to Be by Motion. A claim for attorney's fees and related nontaxable expenses must be made by motion unless the substantive law requires those fees to be proved at trial as an element of damages.
(B) Timing and Contents of the Motion. Unless a statute or a court order provides otherwise, the motion must:
(i) be filed no later than 14 days after the entry of judgment;
(ii) specify the judgment and the statute, rule, or other grounds entitling the movant to the award;
(iii) state the amount sought or provide a fair estimate of it; and
(iv) disclose, if the court so orders, the terms of any agreement about fees for the services for which the claim is made.
Re: TX: Fed Judge Dismisses UT Profs Campus Carry Lawsuito
Article: UT profs say they will appeal ruling in campus carry lawsuit
Three University of Texas faculty members will appeal a federal judge’s ruling to dismiss their lawsuit over a state law that permits students to carry concealed handguns in most campus buildings.
On Monday, attorneys for professors Jennifer Lynn Glass, Lisa Moore and Mia Carter filed a notice saying they will appeal the decision to the 5th Circuit Court of Appeals.
-
- Senior Member
- Posts in topic: 1
- Posts: 4339
- Joined: Mon Jan 04, 2016 8:03 pm
Re: TX: Fed Judge Dismisses UT Profs Campus Carry Lawsuito
The issue here is the 2nd amendment. So shouldn't these profs be suing the founders of this country? Or maybe the Texians who agreed to merge with the United States?
While we are at it, I don't like having to listen to liberal college professors. Who do I sue for giving them the right to free speech?
While we are at it, I don't like having to listen to liberal college professors. Who do I sue for giving them the right to free speech?