Signage question
Moderators: carlson1, Charles L. Cotton
Signage question
So at the house of blues in Dallas, they have " the unlicensed possession" sign and 30.06 signs that don't appear to meet the requirements. Is it not conflicting to post both or is it a requirement at an establishment that sells alcohol?
-
- Senior Member
- Posts in topic: 2
- Posts: 4339
- Joined: Mon Jan 04, 2016 8:03 pm
Re: Signage question
The blue TABC "unlicensed possession" sign is required if they sell alcohol, irrespective of anything else.Treybadd wrote:So at the house of blues in Dallas, they have " the unlicensed possession" sign and 30.06 signs that don't appear to meet the requirements. Is it not conflicting to post both or is it a requirement at an establishment that sells alcohol?
As long as this property is not owned or leased by a government entity, then they can choose to post 30.06 and/or 30.07 signage. From your post, it sounds like they have chosen not to post either of those signs, so any LTC holder should be fine to carry there.
Re: Signage question
They posted signs on 8-1/2x11 paper.
-
- Senior Member
- Posts in topic: 2
- Posts: 4339
- Joined: Mon Jan 04, 2016 8:03 pm
Re: Signage question
Yes, I heard you the first time that they do not have a 30.06 or 30.07 sign posted. Those signs have specific requirements and those requirements are either met, or there is no 30.06 / 30.07 sign. There is no such thing as an "invalid" 30.06 sign. It would just not be a 30.06 sign at all.Treybadd wrote:They posted signs on 8-1/2x11 paper.
Re: Signage question
I kinda thought that was what you meant.