McLennan Cty. in violation of law excluding LTC/CHL holders

CHL discussions that do not fit into more specific topics

Moderators: carlson1, Charles L. Cotton


NTexCopRetired
Member
Posts in topic: 1
Posts: 97
Joined: Mon Mar 30, 2015 5:37 pm

Re: McLennan Cty. in violation of law excluding LTC/CHL holders

#16

Post by NTexCopRetired »

The obvious issue with any of these 30.06 posted places is the same to me. They claim the courthouse is well protected with armed security and it probably is. The movie theater I used to go to has a deputy on duty inside the building. The article in the Waco paper pointed out that it was not necessary for a citizen to be armed in the courthouse with all the security present.

I don't have a problem being unarmed in a location that provides security near as much as I do with walking from my vehicle to the location and back. That is the big issue. If they are willing to provide a personal, armed escort for me to my car, I might have more compassion for their concerns.

MeMelYup
Senior Member
Posts in topic: 1
Posts: 1874
Joined: Mon Nov 15, 2010 3:21 pm

Re: McLennan Cty. in violation of law excluding LTC/CHL holders

#17

Post by MeMelYup »

NTexCopRetired wrote:The obvious issue with any of these 30.06 posted places is the same to me. They claim the courthouse is well protected with armed security and it probably is. The movie theater I used to go to has a deputy on duty inside the building. The article in the Waco paper pointed out that it was not necessary for a citizen to be armed in the courthouse with all the security present.

I don't have a problem being unarmed in a location that provides security near as much as I do with walking from my vehicle to the location and back. That is the big issue. If they are willing to provide a personal, armed escort for me to my car, I might have more compassion for their concerns.
They claim that even though SCOTUS has ruled that the police are not required to protect an individual.

Topic author
338winmag
Junior Member
Posts in topic: 3
Posts: 28
Joined: Fri Feb 19, 2016 4:19 pm

Re: McLennan Cty. in violation of law excluding LTC/CHL holders

#18

Post by 338winmag »

OCT posted a video on their site at a commissioner's court meeting where they pretty much did nothing about it. It looks like the ball is back in the AG's court now.

This could get interesting.

https://www.facebook.com/OpenCarryTexas ... 854148901/

dhoobler
Senior Member
Posts in topic: 4
Posts: 490
Joined: Mon Feb 25, 2008 2:58 pm
Location: Friendswood, TX

Re: McLennan Cty. in violation of law excluding LTC/CHL holders

#19

Post by dhoobler »

treadlightly wrote:
...
I had a nice conversation with an investigator with our Sheriff's Department Monday night. He's pro-gun, isn't the slightest bit ruffled that citizens are carrying guns, but he's skittish about guns in the courthouse.

He said I should come to the courthouse on a day when they are hearing divorce cases and see how angry parents get when they are told they can't have their kids any more.
...
I hear these arguments about prohibiting guns in court houses because of what happens inside court rooms. These are straw man arguments in my mind. None of the arguments for allowing guns in court houses suggest that guns should be allowed in court rooms, where they are prohibited by statute.
Revolver - An elegant weapon... for a more civilized age.
NRA Endowment Life Member
TSRA Life Member

dhoobler
Senior Member
Posts in topic: 4
Posts: 490
Joined: Mon Feb 25, 2008 2:58 pm
Location: Friendswood, TX

Re: McLennan Cty. in violation of law excluding LTC/CHL holders

#20

Post by dhoobler »

County to fight state on courthouse gun ban

http://www.wacotrib.com/news/courts_and ... l?mode=jqm

Alternative headline: County to waste taxpayer money
Revolver - An elegant weapon... for a more civilized age.
NRA Endowment Life Member
TSRA Life Member

JP171
Banned
Posts in topic: 1
Posts: 1406
Joined: Tue Apr 05, 2011 5:47 am
Location: San Leon Texas

Re: McLennan Cty. in violation of law excluding LTC/CHL holders

#21

Post by JP171 »

dhoobler wrote:County to fight state on courthouse gun ban

http://www.wacotrib.com/news/courts_and ... l?mode=jqm

Alternative headline: County to waste taxpayer money
I hope that they get their tail ends handed to them, and possibly held in contempt to add a little insult to injury. the law is quite clear to me, buildings OR portions of buildings. that statement to me indicates the legislature mean that multi use buildings are to be controlled at the court and offices expressly used by the court for court functions ONLY not the hallways latrines any other offices(tax office county clerk admin the list goes on) and non waiting areas in the same building. too many cities are saying city hall is off limits because they hold a kangaroo court there once a month. PAH! they are being typical anti gun liberal (insert favorite derogatory term) :banghead:

treadlightly
Senior Member
Posts in topic: 2
Posts: 1335
Joined: Mon Jan 05, 2015 1:17 pm

Re: McLennan Cty. in violation of law excluding LTC/CHL holders

#22

Post by treadlightly »

Interesting. CJ Grisham was quoted by the Waco Tribune as saying he's a "badged and credentialed special agent."

I wonder what agency - anybody know?
User avatar

Pariah3j
Senior Member
Posts in topic: 1
Posts: 865
Joined: Thu Oct 08, 2015 5:03 pm
Location: Webster

Re: McLennan Cty. in violation of law excluding LTC/CHL holders

#23

Post by Pariah3j »

treadlightly wrote:Interesting. CJ Grisham was quoted by the Waco Tribune as saying he's a "badged and credentialed special agent."

I wonder what agency - anybody know?
Space Cadets ?
"When governments fear the people, there is liberty. When the people fear the government, there is tyranny" - Thomas Jefferson
User avatar

C-dub
Senior Member
Posts in topic: 2
Posts: 13562
Joined: Sat May 16, 2009 7:18 pm
Location: DFW

Re: McLennan Cty. in violation of law excluding LTC/CHL holders

#24

Post by C-dub »

treadlightly wrote:In other words, he's a good guy, pro 2nd Amendment, pro citizen carry, but it's hard for him to get out of his head what people will do when courts decide against them.

I sympathize. I still have rights in need of further expansion, but I sympathize. It's not a perfect world.
This is one of the biggest problems as I see it. It's not a perfect world, but some would like to try and make it that way at all costs. This investigator would like to make the courthouse a perfectly safe place not recognizing that if that violence is going to happen it will only happen somewhere else and that is okay with him for some reason.
I am not and have never been a LEO. My avatar is in honor of my friend, Dallas Police Sargent Michael Smith, who was murdered along with four other officers in Dallas on 7.7.2016.
NRA Patriot-Endowment Lifetime Member---------------------------------------------Si vis pacem, para bellum.................................................Patriot Guard Rider
User avatar

Dadtodabone
Senior Member
Posts in topic: 1
Posts: 1339
Joined: Mon Mar 11, 2013 10:46 pm

Re: McLennan Cty. in violation of law excluding LTC/CHL holders

#25

Post by Dadtodabone »

Pariah3j wrote:
treadlightly wrote:Interesting. CJ Grisham was quoted by the Waco Tribune as saying he's a "badged and credentialed special agent."

I wonder what agency - anybody know?
Space Cadets ?
I believe that he claims LEOSA rights. Apparently he worked on a counter terrorism task force and had police credentials, badge/id.
I'm not a supporter, just answering a question.
"Caesar si viveret, ad remum dareris!"
User avatar

C-dub
Senior Member
Posts in topic: 2
Posts: 13562
Joined: Sat May 16, 2009 7:18 pm
Location: DFW

Re: McLennan Cty. in violation of law excluding LTC/CHL holders

#26

Post by C-dub »

treadlightly wrote:Interesting. CJ Grisham was quoted by the Waco Tribune as saying he's a "badged and credentialed special agent."

I wonder what agency - anybody know?
Oh, he's special all right. :roll:
I am not and have never been a LEO. My avatar is in honor of my friend, Dallas Police Sargent Michael Smith, who was murdered along with four other officers in Dallas on 7.7.2016.
NRA Patriot-Endowment Lifetime Member---------------------------------------------Si vis pacem, para bellum.................................................Patriot Guard Rider
User avatar

oohrah
Senior Member
Posts in topic: 2
Posts: 1375
Joined: Mon May 27, 2013 5:54 pm
Location: McLennan County

Re: McLennan Cty. in violation of law excluding LTC/CHL holders

#27

Post by oohrah »

Update

http://www.wacotrib.com/news/mclennan_c ... 484d6.html

The county will move non-court offices out of the annex so only court offices remain, and the signs stay up. The AG has agreed.
USMC, Retired
Treating one variety of person as better or worse than others by accident of birth is morally indefensible.

casp625
Senior Member
Posts in topic: 1
Posts: 671
Joined: Sun Jan 04, 2015 9:24 pm

Re: McLennan Cty. in violation of law excluding LTC/CHL holders

#28

Post by casp625 »

Moving all non-essential offices out of the building sounds pretty reasonable.

Soccerdad1995
Senior Member
Posts in topic: 1
Posts: 4339
Joined: Mon Jan 04, 2016 8:03 pm

Re: McLennan Cty. in violation of law excluding LTC/CHL holders

#29

Post by Soccerdad1995 »

oohrah wrote:Update

http://www.wacotrib.com/news/mclennan_c ... 484d6.html

The county will move non-court offices out of the annex so only court offices remain, and the signs stay up. The AG has agreed.
If they move every non-essential court office out of the building, then that seems to be reasonable. But why are the signs staying up in the mean time? How long will this transition take? And how are LTC holders supposed to know when they can no longer legally carry in the building?

The signs should come down and remain down until the office move is complete, IMHO. And fines still need to be assessed for every day that the signs were improperly posted.

rc-mike
Junior Member
Posts in topic: 1
Posts: 18
Joined: Sun Mar 01, 2015 7:47 pm

Re: McLennan Cty. in violation of law excluding LTC/CHL holders

#30

Post by rc-mike »

And... they aren't moving them all, just some of them. The commissioner's court, which he names in his original letter is not being moved.

-Mike-
Post Reply

Return to “General Texas CHL Discussion”