Concealabiltiy: M&P9 vs. M&P9c
Posted: Fri Jul 03, 2009 4:22 pm
I've come to realize that in Texas, ounces matter in a CCW and pounds really matter. I had been planning on carrying an officer 1911, but when comparing weights, I soon realized there is almost a full pound difference between an officer 1911 and a full-size M&P9.
So, that got me re-thinking what to carry when I want a larger gun (KelTec PF9 will be normal weekday/workday/9-5 gun); maybe I need to think harder about my M&P. But my realization of lighter is nicer (not necessarily "better") for carry has led me to wonder if the M&P9c is what I should look at. It's another 3 ounces lighter, still has 12+1 firepower (almost 2x the PF9) and is only 4" tall.
I own the full-size. Would I be gaining anything as far as concealability by swapping for a compact version?
Q
So, that got me re-thinking what to carry when I want a larger gun (KelTec PF9 will be normal weekday/workday/9-5 gun); maybe I need to think harder about my M&P. But my realization of lighter is nicer (not necessarily "better") for carry has led me to wonder if the M&P9c is what I should look at. It's another 3 ounces lighter, still has 12+1 firepower (almost 2x the PF9) and is only 4" tall.
I own the full-size. Would I be gaining anything as far as concealability by swapping for a compact version?
Q