Concealabiltiy: M&P9 vs. M&P9c

Gun, shooting and equipment discussions unrelated to CHL issues

Moderator: carlson1

Post Reply

Topic author
quoheleth
Member
Posts in topic: 1
Posts: 168
Joined: Mon Aug 25, 2008 8:51 am

Concealabiltiy: M&P9 vs. M&P9c

#1

Post by quoheleth »

I've come to realize that in Texas, ounces matter in a CCW and pounds really matter. I had been planning on carrying an officer 1911, but when comparing weights, I soon realized there is almost a full pound difference between an officer 1911 and a full-size M&P9.

So, that got me re-thinking what to carry when I want a larger gun (KelTec PF9 will be normal weekday/workday/9-5 gun); maybe I need to think harder about my M&P. But my realization of lighter is nicer (not necessarily "better") for carry has led me to wonder if the M&P9c is what I should look at. It's another 3 ounces lighter, still has 12+1 firepower (almost 2x the PF9) and is only 4" tall.

I own the full-size. Would I be gaining anything as far as concealability by swapping for a compact version?

Q
Texas CHL received 07/24/09 and being used daily.
User avatar

nitrogen
Senior Member
Posts in topic: 1
Posts: 2322
Joined: Wed Dec 21, 2005 1:15 pm
Location: Sachse, TX
Contact:

Re: Concealabiltiy: M&P9 vs. M&P9c

#2

Post by nitrogen »

I regurlarly carry the M&P9 and it's rarely a problem. I carry a 1911 during the colder months.

The only issue I really have with the M&P9 i'd have with any gun, is that it causes sweat and stuff to collect when its hot out. I'm considering getting a mousegun for those months.
.השואה... לעולם לא עוד
Holocaust... Never Again.
Some people create their own storms and get upset when it rains.
--anonymous

CompVest
Senior Member
Posts in topic: 1
Posts: 3079
Joined: Sun Jan 02, 2005 7:17 pm

Re: Concealabiltiy: M&P9 vs. M&P9c

#3

Post by CompVest »

I carry my M&P9c in a Tucker pancake holster. I like it for carry better then my standard M&P9 because the grip is shorter making it easier to conceal.
Women on the DRAW – drill, revise, attain, win
Coached Practice Sessions for Women
User avatar

The Annoyed Man
Senior Member
Posts in topic: 1
Posts: 26850
Joined: Wed Jan 16, 2008 12:59 pm
Location: North Richland Hills, Texas
Contact:

Re: Concealabiltiy: M&P9 vs. M&P9c

#4

Post by The Annoyed Man »

I can't answer bout M&P pistols, but my primary carry pistols these days are my alloy framed 3" Kimber, and my steel framed 5" Springfield. I've found that carrying the 5" in a Galco Concealable Belt Holster (OWB) not only conceals well, but it is very comfortable. I carry the 3" pistol in an MTAC Minotaur, and as comfortable as that is for an IWB holster, the Galco OWB holster is really top notch, and I don't really notice the weight of the pistol that much.

The secret to concealability, for either pistol/holster combo, is an untucked, loose fitting shirt.
“Hard times create strong men. Strong men create good times. Good times create weak men. And, weak men create hard times.”

― G. Michael Hopf, "Those Who Remain"

#TINVOWOOT

TexaNurse
Junior Member
Posts in topic: 1
Posts: 39
Joined: Thu Feb 07, 2008 7:14 pm
Location: Missouri City

Re: Concealabiltiy: M&P9 vs. M&P9c

#5

Post by TexaNurse »

I own and carry the M&P 9 fullsize. This is from carrying a RIA 1911 compact which was from a Springfield 1911 GI.

I don't have much of a problem. I would recommend using a 13/4 inch wide belt versus the usual 11/2. It made a world of a difference.

I chose the fullsize M&P because IMO I felt that the compact model was TOO small.
Post Reply

Return to “General Gun, Shooting & Equipment Discussion”