Page 1 of 2
AWB ban petition...this one counts!
Posted: Fri Oct 26, 2007 8:37 pm
by WarHawk-AVG
http://www.thepetitionsite.com/takeaction/409898348
Make your voice be heard
Let everyone you know, know about this
Posted: Fri Oct 26, 2007 8:38 pm
by WarHawk-AVG
I'm 40,137..even though I hit enter before I checked my name....DOH!
Posted: Fri Oct 26, 2007 9:06 pm
by Dougmyers5
40,138 and darn proud of it!
Posted: Sat Oct 27, 2007 1:28 am
by KBCraig
A bill to ban a wide variety of semi-automatic firearms, especially those where a huge variety of after-market customization options, is named "H.R.
1022"?
That might be the most ironically named law since PC 30.06!
With no action other than being referred to the subcommittee in March, and the 59 co-sponsors being limited to the usual suspects, and
especially with the anti-gunners being kept in check because of the pending '08 election season, I'd say this is pretty much DOA.
Posted: Sat Oct 27, 2007 7:28 am
by stevie_d_64
I've signed so many of these on this bill its not even funny...
But they do hear me loud and clear! Every single time!
Posted: Sat Oct 27, 2007 9:44 am
by AEA
Even the title of the Bill "Assault Weapons Ban" is incorrect.
Assault Weapons (which are select fire - Full Auto) are already semi-banned (heavily controlled) and unavailable to citizens without a lot of paperwork, Tax Stamp and 15,000-35,000 for the gun!
If they are going to introduce a bill, why can't they get the terminology correct?
In any case, it still only serves to eliminate purchases of LEGAL weapons by Law Abiding Citizens! Criminals do not care anything about "Bills" and what is passed and what is not. They of course will always get what they want when they want it.
It is only a Dem "Feel Good" measure that restricts gun ownership by Law Abiding Citizens!
Posted: Sun Oct 28, 2007 9:53 pm
by quidni
#40,187.
Thanks for posting the link.
Posted: Sun Oct 28, 2007 10:10 pm
by stevie_d_64
AEA wrote:If they are going to introduce a bill, why can't they get the terminology correct?
Shhhhh, let that go...Its because they and those that co-sponsor these types of bills are stupid...Its really that simple...
Posted: Sun Oct 28, 2007 10:55 pm
by nitrogen
I think these things are mostly useless, but I sign them anyway.
I was number 40,189.
Posted: Mon Oct 29, 2007 2:27 am
by swiven
40,192
Posted: Mon Oct 29, 2007 10:11 am
by GrillKing
AEA wrote:
If they are going to introduce a bill, why can't they get the terminology correct?
Because they don't care about the facts.....
Posted: Mon Oct 29, 2007 10:15 am
by GrillKing
40,200
Posted: Mon Oct 29, 2007 11:44 am
by calvinbr
40,203
Calvin
Posted: Mon Oct 29, 2007 5:08 pm
by TxRVer
Thanks for the thread. Done