How well would a firearm like the M4 perform in outer space?

Gun, shooting and equipment discussions unrelated to CHL issues

Moderator: carlson1

User avatar

Topic author
The Annoyed Man
Senior Member
Posts in topic: 7
Posts: 26850
Joined: Wed Jan 16, 2008 12:59 pm
Location: North Richland Hills, Texas
Contact:

Re: How well would a firearm like the M4 perform in outer sp

#31

Post by The Annoyed Man »

Steve133 wrote:This discussion has officially passed the threshold of conversations that I can meaningfully participate in on my phone during quick breaks at work, so I'll limit my response to the following for right now:
fizteach wrote:I don't think the M4 would be classified as a black body.

Great discussion. Let's talk about some more physics :hurry:
Dude, I was a physics major. EVERYTHING (stars, trains, horses, M4s, etc.) is a spherical blackbody in a frictionless vacuum. And all constants are some power of ten multiplied by "about 3".

The "spherical cow" approach is close enough for government work, and certainly close enough for Internet spitballing about guns in space.
:shock: Good Lord! Sheldon Cooper has gone and gotten himself a CHL! :shock:

Q: How many theoretical physicists specializing in general relativity does it take to change a light bulb?
A: Two. One to hold the bulb and one to rotate the universe.

Q: What is the simplest way to observe the optical Doppler effect?
A: Go out at and look at cars. The lights of the ones approaching you are white, while the lights of the ones moving away from you are red.

The Heineken Uncertainty Principle says "You can never be sure how many beers you had last night."

According to Einstein's Theory of Relatives, the probability of in-laws visiting you is directly proportional to how much you feel like being left alone.

Einstein's favorite limerick was:
There was an old lady called Wright
who could travel much faster than light.
She departed one day
in a relative way
and returned on the previous night.

A student riding in a train looks up and sees Einstein sitting next to him. Excited he asks, "Excuse me, professor. Does Boston stop at this train?"

There is a sign in Munich that says, "Heisenberg might have slept here."

I'll be here all week. Don't forget to tip your waiter.
“Hard times create strong men. Strong men create good times. Good times create weak men. And, weak men create hard times.”

― G. Michael Hopf, "Those Who Remain"

#TINVOWOOT
User avatar

Dadtodabone
Senior Member
Posts in topic: 4
Posts: 1339
Joined: Mon Mar 11, 2013 10:46 pm

Re: How well would a firearm like the M4 perform in outer sp

#32

Post by Dadtodabone »

I'll go with Penny, I love Fig Newtons.
[youtube][/youtube]
"Caesar si viveret, ad remum dareris!"
User avatar

Topic author
The Annoyed Man
Senior Member
Posts in topic: 7
Posts: 26850
Joined: Wed Jan 16, 2008 12:59 pm
Location: North Richland Hills, Texas
Contact:

Re: How well would a firearm like the M4 perform in outer sp

#33

Post by The Annoyed Man »

Dadtodabone wrote:I'll go with Penny, I love Fig Newtons.
I'll go with Penny for almost any reason whatsoever. :smilelol5:
“Hard times create strong men. Strong men create good times. Good times create weak men. And, weak men create hard times.”

― G. Michael Hopf, "Those Who Remain"

#TINVOWOOT
User avatar

jimlongley
Senior Member
Posts in topic: 6
Posts: 6134
Joined: Wed Jan 12, 2005 1:31 pm
Location: Allen, TX

Re: How well would a firearm like the M4 perform in outer sp

#34

Post by jimlongley »

Believe it or not, in my own true Sheldon Cooper style, I was ruminating on this issue while undergoing acupuncture treatment this afternoon, and realized that using a full auto M4, with adequate heat dispersal, might serve well as a propulsion system, ala "nuclear pulse propulsion."

Let's see F=ma, assume that m = ~250Kg, F = (Free recoil energy of the gun (say an average .223 with 55 grain projectile; 27 grains of powder; 3240 fps muzzle velocity; 7 lb (actually included in the initial mass estimate);1.27 lb/sec recoil impulse; 5.8 fps recoil velocity; 3.7 lb recoil energy)) then a would be F divided by m. F, normalized for differences in units

This, it might take a lot of rounds, but one might expect about .03 m/sec per shot acceleration, so after about 100 rounds, one could accomplish a velocity of 1 m/sec, or a fast walk.

I think.

But now my head hurts.

I must go view back episodes of Big Bang Theory until I have an adequate Penny fix.
Real gun control, carrying 24/7/365

Steve133
Member
Posts in topic: 4
Posts: 63
Joined: Thu May 26, 2011 6:59 pm

Re: How well would a firearm like the M4 perform in outer sp

#35

Post by Steve133 »

fizteach wrote:
Steve133 wrote:This discussion has officially passed the threshold of conversations that I can meaningfully participate in on my phone during quick breaks at work, so I'll limit my response to the following for right now:
fizteach wrote:I don't think the M4 would be classified as a black body.

Great discussion. Let's talk about some more physics :hurry:
Dude, I was a physics major. EVERYTHING (stars, trains, horses, M4s, etc.) is a spherical blackbody in a frictionless vacuum. And all constants are some power of ten multiplied by "about 3".

The "spherical cow" approach is close enough for government work, and certainly close enough for Internet spitballing about guns in space.
It's a good thing I didn't state unequivocably that the object would not be a black body. A simple as I recall statement would have sufficed rather than condescension.

But that's just the way I approach things.
Apologies, still not sure how that statement was taken as being condescending, but that certainly wasn't my intent. I was going for "yeah, it's not exact, but I'm just a dumb physicist, I can't do exact" comment - self deprecating jokes about only being able to think about spherical frictionless cows are pretty common in physics circles (abstraction to the point of uselessness is part of why I'm now an engineer instead of a physicist), but I guess that doesn't come across as well in text as it does in speech.

That said, this IS about the first time that a topic that I'm this uniquely qualified to talk about has come up on this board, can't promise I won't get carried away again....

JSThane
Banned
Posts in topic: 1
Posts: 610
Joined: Sun Sep 18, 2011 12:07 pm

Re: How well would a firearm like the M4 perform in outer sp

#36

Post by JSThane »

jimlongley wrote:Believe it or not, in my own true Sheldon Cooper style, I was ruminating on this issue while undergoing acupuncture treatment this afternoon, and realized that using a full auto M4, with adequate heat dispersal, might serve well as a propulsion system, ala "nuclear pulse propulsion."
Now I'm remembering the concept of the Orion Drive...
User avatar

Dadtodabone
Senior Member
Posts in topic: 4
Posts: 1339
Joined: Mon Mar 11, 2013 10:46 pm

Re: How well would a firearm like the M4 perform in outer sp

#37

Post by Dadtodabone »

The Annoyed Man wrote:
Dadtodabone wrote:I'll go with Penny, I love Fig Newtons.
I'll go with Penny for almost any reason whatsoever. :smilelol5:
As an aside, I think I met Sheldon's mother at The Egg & I, after church last Sunday. Not Jim Parson's mother, I mean Sheldon's mother, as played by
Ms. Metcalf. I always thought she was a caricature, lol.
"Caesar si viveret, ad remum dareris!"
User avatar

Purplehood
Senior Member
Posts in topic: 6
Posts: 4638
Joined: Thu May 29, 2008 3:35 pm
Location: Houston, TX

Re: How well would a firearm like the M4 perform in outer sp

#38

Post by Purplehood »

Isn't the Orion-drive simply a massive nuclear-version of what one might be able to accomplish in space with severe-flatulence?
Life NRA
USMC 76-93
USAR 99-07 (Retired)
OEF 06-07
User avatar

jimlongley
Senior Member
Posts in topic: 6
Posts: 6134
Joined: Wed Jan 12, 2005 1:31 pm
Location: Allen, TX

Re: How well would a firearm like the M4 perform in outer sp

#39

Post by jimlongley »

Dadtodabone wrote:
The Annoyed Man wrote:
Dadtodabone wrote:I'll go with Penny, I love Fig Newtons.
I'll go with Penny for almost any reason whatsoever. :smilelol5:
As an aside, I think I met Sheldon's mother at The Egg & I, after church last Sunday. Not Jim Parson's mother, I mean Sheldon's mother, as played by
Ms. Metcalf. I always thought she was a caricature, lol.
I have met several caricatures, and it never ceases to be a surprise. I always find myself wondering if they pattern themselves after the prototype, or they are just that way naturally. The whole story is way too long, but my late wife used to have a student who laughed just like Horshack (sp?) in "Welcome Back Cotter" and the whole class would break up in helpless laughter whenever she laughed. We often wondered if she knew they were laughing at her/the laugh, instead of with her.
Real gun control, carrying 24/7/365
User avatar

jimlongley
Senior Member
Posts in topic: 6
Posts: 6134
Joined: Wed Jan 12, 2005 1:31 pm
Location: Allen, TX

Re: How well would a firearm like the M4 perform in outer sp

#40

Post by jimlongley »

george wrote:
jimlongley wrote:Believe it or not, in my own true Sheldon Cooper style, I was ruminating on this issue while undergoing acupuncture treatment this afternoon, and realized that using a full auto M4, with adequate heat dispersal, might serve well as a propulsion system, ala "nuclear pulse propulsion."

Let's see F=ma, assume that m = ~250Kg, F = (Free recoil energy of the gun (say an average .223 with 55 grain projectile; 27 grains of powder; 3240 fps muzzle velocity; 7 lb (actually included in the initial mass estimate);1.27 lb/sec recoil impulse; 5.8 fps recoil velocity; 3.7 lb recoil energy)) then a would be F divided by m. F, normalized for differences in units

This, it might take a lot of rounds, but one might expect about .03 m/sec per shot acceleration, so after about 100 rounds, one could accomplish a velocity of 1 m/sec, or a fast walk.

I think.

But now my head hurts.

I must go view back episodes of Big Bang Theory until I have an adequate Penny fix.


Are you confusing mass and weight, Jim?
Not unless I have made a massive error. :smilelol5:
Real gun control, carrying 24/7/365

Dave2
Senior Member
Posts in topic: 2
Posts: 3166
Joined: Thu Sep 02, 2010 1:39 am
Location: Bay Area, CA

Re: How well would a firearm like the M4 perform in outer sp

#41

Post by Dave2 »

jimlongley wrote:
george wrote:Are you confusing mass and weight, Jim?
Not unless I have made a massive error. :smilelol5:
Really? Puns at a time like this? You fail to understand the gravity of the situation.



:leaving
I am not a lawyer, nor have I played one on TV, nor did I stay at a Holiday Inn Express last night, nor should anything I say be taken as legal advice. If it is important that any information be accurate, do not use me as the only source.
User avatar

WildBill
Senior Member
Posts in topic: 3
Posts: 17350
Joined: Tue Jul 03, 2007 12:53 pm
Location: Houston

Re: How well would a firearm like the M4 perform in outer sp

#42

Post by WildBill »

I have worked on space hardware used on shuttle and ISS EVAs and well as rocket propulsion systems.

As I recall, Braycote was the most common lubricant on the EVA hardware. Many items also had surface coating as lubricants. Many of the EVA tools are commerically available items that have been modified for some of the conditions of space as well as crew safety. For example, torque wrenches that you could buy at Sears and Black and Decker battery-powered drills and screwdrivers. We did vibration and temperture cycle testing as part of the design verification and acceptance testing.

A caveat - if exposed to very low temperatures [-200F] carbon steel and brass will crack, so a kaboom is likely.

I have no doubt that the cartridge would fire and the gun would cycle. Many people are still confused by "gunpowder" containing "oxygen". That is true with black powder, but not smokeless powder. Smokeless powder is actually a propellant that works by decomposing into gasses. The heat expands the gasses and propels the bullet from the barrel.
NRA Endowment Member
User avatar

WildBill
Senior Member
Posts in topic: 3
Posts: 17350
Joined: Tue Jul 03, 2007 12:53 pm
Location: Houston

Re: How well would a firearm like the M4 perform in outer sp

#43

Post by WildBill »

george wrote:
WildBill wrote: I have no doubt that the cartridge would fire and the gun would cycle. Many people are still confused by "gunpowder" containing "oxygen". That is true with black powder, but not smokeless powder. Smokeless powder is actually a propellant that works by decomposing into gasses. The heat expands the gasses and propels the bullet from the barrel.
I did not know that.
Nitroglycerin, a component of double-based powder, is a perfect example. It is a pure chemical containing oxygen and nitrogen. When it decomposes it creates nitrogen gas and heat. The heat expands the nitrogen gas and that is what causes the increase in pressure that causes the bullet to travel down the barrel. Of course, pure nitroglycerin would decompose so fast that it would destroy the gun.

When I was in the solid rocket motor business one test that we performed measured the burn rate of the propellant by burning it under water. That type of propellant did have an oxidizer mixed into the formulation.
Last edited by WildBill on Sat Jun 15, 2013 9:29 am, edited 2 times in total.
NRA Endowment Member
Post Reply

Return to “General Gun, Shooting & Equipment Discussion”