Lightweight 1911s

Gun, shooting and equipment discussions unrelated to CHL issues

Moderator: carlson1


Bullwhip
Senior Member
Posts in topic: 1
Posts: 530
Joined: Mon Sep 06, 2010 4:31 am

Re: Lightweight 1911s

#16

Post by Bullwhip »

If I paid $2.5K + for a gun I think I'd be afraid to shoot it.

I can buy a lot of ammo and even a couple of replacement $600 guns for that kinda money!

Seabear
Senior Member
Posts in topic: 1
Posts: 781
Joined: Sun Mar 07, 2010 1:36 pm
Location: Corpus Christi , TX
Contact:

Re: Lightweight 1911s

#17

Post by Seabear »

Well, I owned a Kimber CDPII for a short time. It was a beautiful gun, till I shot it. I don't know how, but during the first 50 rounds I got one scratch on the side of the frame, and somehow put a ding in the checkering on the front of the grip. As stated above if you go allow, only use mags with plastic followers. My kimber came with one mag, and it had a steel follower. It scatched and gouged the inside of the frame like you wouldn't believe.

If you like pretty guns and want them to stay pretty, then IMHO carrying an alloy frame is not going to be or you. My carry guns are tools just like a hammer, I can't be worrying about bumping into everything. I got rid of the Kimber so someone else could keep it pretty.
Carry safe and carry when and where you can. I'm just sayin'.
User avatar

The Annoyed Man
Senior Member
Posts in topic: 1
Posts: 26850
Joined: Wed Jan 16, 2008 12:59 pm
Location: North Richland Hills, Texas
Contact:

Re: Lightweight 1911s

#18

Post by The Annoyed Man »

I have an alloy framed carry 1911, and it runs fine. I remember reading somewhere that Kimber carry guns have been tested beyond 20,000 rounds without any signs of wear or failure. Mine no longer has a pristine finish, and it isn't free of minor marks. I don't care. For one thing, the gun stays concealed and (God willing) it will always remain concealed. Nobody can see it. So I'm likely the only one who is ever going to know or care about the honest wear and dings of a daily carry weapon... ...and I don't care. It's just a tool, not my identity.

$2,500 barbecue guns are beyond my ken. Only one of my rifle/scope combinations is worth that much, and I didn't spend the money in one fell swoop. I don't wear bling either. Pistols in that price range are not even on my radar, so I'm not qualified to comment on any in any specific way, except to say that they are real pretty to look at but I'd be afraid to carry one because..... ....in the real world, carry guns, even steel framed carry guns, pick up dings and scratches. Just ask my steel framed Springfield.

But as far as alloy-framed 1911s go, I think they are generally a better idea for day to day carry than steel framed guns because they are lighter and consequently more comfortable than their all steel counterparts for all day wear.

Your mileage may vary.
“Hard times create strong men. Strong men create good times. Good times create weak men. And, weak men create hard times.”

― G. Michael Hopf, "Those Who Remain"

#TINVOWOOT
User avatar

AEA
Senior Member
Posts in topic: 2
Posts: 5110
Joined: Sat May 12, 2007 12:00 pm
Location: North Texas

Re: Lightweight 1911s

#19

Post by AEA »

My EMP has a alloy frame. It is light and easy to carry (when I get it back from Springfield - another thread).

I only shoot it to prove it and carry. It will last my lifetime and my Son's lifetime.
Alan - ANYTHING I write is MY OPINION only.
Certified Curmudgeon - But, my German Shepherd loves me!
NRA-Life, USN '65-'69 & '73-'79: RM1
1911's RULE!
User avatar

RiverRat
Senior Member
Posts in topic: 1
Posts: 580
Joined: Mon Mar 31, 2008 10:15 pm
Location: near Democrat, TX

Re: Lightweight 1911s

#20

Post by RiverRat »

The wife carries a CQB compact LW that I had made for her. I don't see any more wear on it that my BW Carry that I carry. Both are around 2500 rounds. I won't think you'd see issues with a LW until after 15 or 20K rounds. By then you ought to be old friends ;-) .
Life member NRA and TSRA
Post Reply

Return to “General Gun, Shooting & Equipment Discussion”