Size Comparison: H&K Compact vs 1911 Commander

Gun, shooting and equipment discussions unrelated to CHL issues

Moderator: carlson1

Post Reply

Topic author
doc540
Senior Member
Posts in topic: 3
Posts: 1213
Joined: Sun Dec 30, 2007 10:37 am

Size Comparison: H&K Compact vs 1911 Commander

#1

Post by doc540 »

HK USPC .40 vs Colt Combat Commander Series 70 in 9mm

Image

Image

Image

Image
http://www.train2shoot.net" onclick="window.open(this.href);return false;
NRA Lifetime Member
NRA Instructor
"Shooting more, typing less"
User avatar

gigag04
Senior Member
Posts in topic: 1
Posts: 5474
Joined: Wed May 04, 2005 7:47 pm
Location: Houston

Re: Size Comparison: H&K Compact vs 1911 Commander

#2

Post by gigag04 »

USPc can be made bearable if flush floorplates are installed on the mags. But yeah...they're chunky.
Opportunity is missed by most people because it is dressed in overalls and looks like work. - Thomas Edison
User avatar

The Annoyed Man
Senior Member
Posts in topic: 2
Posts: 26849
Joined: Wed Jan 16, 2008 12:59 pm
Location: North Richland Hills, Texas
Contact:

Re: Size Comparison: H&K Compact vs 1911 Commander

#3

Post by The Annoyed Man »

I found my USPc .40 to be quite comfortable, despite the additional bulk compared to a 1911. When I bought mine, I also owned a Commander sized Sig 1911. I don't regret selling the Sig, but I very much regret selling my USPc.
“Hard times create strong men. Strong men create good times. Good times create weak men. And, weak men create hard times.”

― G. Michael Hopf, "Those Who Remain"

#TINVOWOOT

Topic author
doc540
Senior Member
Posts in topic: 3
Posts: 1213
Joined: Sun Dec 30, 2007 10:37 am

Re: Size Comparison: H&K Compact vs 1911 Commander

#4

Post by doc540 »

No real preference here. They both carry and shoot well. Of course, the Commanders are so much prettier. :cool:
http://www.train2shoot.net" onclick="window.open(this.href);return false;
NRA Lifetime Member
NRA Instructor
"Shooting more, typing less"

Fisherman74
Member
Posts in topic: 1
Posts: 64
Joined: Mon Sep 28, 2009 5:50 pm

Re: Size Comparison: H&K Compact vs 1911 Commander

#5

Post by Fisherman74 »

Two nice pistols.

Carry-a-Kimber
Senior Member
Posts in topic: 2
Posts: 1715
Joined: Mon Nov 16, 2009 4:58 am
Location: Harris County

Re: Size Comparison: H&K Compact vs 1911 Commander

#6

Post by Carry-a-Kimber »

I own and carry both and really don't prefer one over the other. I shoot the 1911 better because I have much more range time with it, but I shoot the HK really well too. Typically comes down to what I am wearing.

Zoomie72
Junior Member
Posts in topic: 1
Posts: 17
Joined: Thu Jun 02, 2011 3:14 pm

Re: Size Comparison: H&K Compact vs 1911 Commander

#7

Post by Zoomie72 »

That width definitely makes a big difference, but my USPc.45 isn't the worst thing in the world to carry. Winter makes carrying easy, because the pistol really is relatively light weight. It's summer with the light clothing that makes it hard to conceal. It's always comfortable though. Flat floor plates and the bobbed hammer. The finish is still sweat proof as far as I can tell. Thanks for the pictures!
User avatar

RoyGBiv
Senior Member
Posts in topic: 2
Posts: 9548
Joined: Wed Jan 05, 2011 11:41 am
Location: Fort Worth

Re: Size Comparison: H&K Compact vs 1911 Commander

#8

Post by RoyGBiv »

This one is "more better" for CC than the USP... ;-)

Image
I am not a lawyer. This is NOT legal advice.!
Nothing tempers idealism quite like the cold bath of reality.... SQLGeek

Carry-a-Kimber
Senior Member
Posts in topic: 2
Posts: 1715
Joined: Mon Nov 16, 2009 4:58 am
Location: Harris County

Re: Size Comparison: H&K Compact vs 1911 Commander

#9

Post by Carry-a-Kimber »

RoyGBiv wrote:This one is "more better" for CC than the USP... ;-)

Image
:iagree: I carry my P2000SK a lot more than my USPc.
User avatar

The Annoyed Man
Senior Member
Posts in topic: 2
Posts: 26849
Joined: Wed Jan 16, 2008 12:59 pm
Location: North Richland Hills, Texas
Contact:

Re: Size Comparison: H&K Compact vs 1911 Commander

#10

Post by The Annoyed Man »

RoyGBiv wrote:This one is "more better" for CC than the USP... ;-)

Image
Why is that?
“Hard times create strong men. Strong men create good times. Good times create weak men. And, weak men create hard times.”

― G. Michael Hopf, "Those Who Remain"

#TINVOWOOT

gwtrikenut
Member
Posts in topic: 1
Posts: 176
Joined: Tue May 05, 2009 4:45 pm
Location: Claremore, Oklahoma

Re: Size Comparison: H&K Compact vs 1911 Commander

#11

Post by gwtrikenut »

The Annoyed Man wrote:
RoyGBiv wrote:This one is "more better" for CC than the USP... ;-)

Image
Why is that?
I am interested too. Right now I carry my Ed Brown 45cal. Yes it is an expensive gun to carry. But I did not buy it to be a safe queen. If I wanted a safe queen, I would have kept my cash. But that said, the Brown weights in at 34 oz. empty and with a full mag 41oz. Gets pretty heavy after several hours. Was going to wait on a Beretta PX4 compact 40. But Beretta can't come up with a release date. Heard everything from this month to 2012.
So I guess my question too is why your current carry? What is your current carry? Caliber? Weight empty and full? Length, width, & height? Let's compare apples to apples. But be sure to include caliber.

Topic author
doc540
Senior Member
Posts in topic: 3
Posts: 1213
Joined: Sun Dec 30, 2007 10:37 am

Re: Size Comparison: H&K Compact vs 1911 Commander

#12

Post by doc540 »

1974 Colt Combat Commander in .45

With a quality pancake holster it comfortable and concealed.

Never weighed it since it doesn't seem to be heavy.

Image
http://www.train2shoot.net" onclick="window.open(this.href);return false;
NRA Lifetime Member
NRA Instructor
"Shooting more, typing less"
User avatar

RoyGBiv
Senior Member
Posts in topic: 2
Posts: 9548
Joined: Wed Jan 05, 2011 11:41 am
Location: Fort Worth

Re: Size Comparison: H&K Compact vs 1911 Commander

#13

Post by RoyGBiv »

The Annoyed Man wrote:
RoyGBiv wrote:This one is "more better" for CC than the USP... ;-)
Why is that?
Image Image

I found the USP a bit more difficult to conceal.... For me, the most important concealment dimension is the height of the grip from the bottom of the trigger guard to the butt. Basically, the length of the grip outside the holster. Even though the USP compact and P2000SK are virtually the same overall height, there was something about the USP-C that just wasn't working for me. The butt was always printing.

Honestly, I "tried them on" and the P2000SK just worked better for me.
It just exactly fit my XL (glove size) hands. YMMV. Both are great shooters.
Oh... and the adjustable/swappable backstrap on the P2000SK is also really nice.
I am not a lawyer. This is NOT legal advice.!
Nothing tempers idealism quite like the cold bath of reality.... SQLGeek
Post Reply

Return to “General Gun, Shooting & Equipment Discussion”