So they confiscated the gun(s)?9mmLover wrote:he will be contacting me this week with a 100% answer on the status of the firearm.
On what grounds if so?
Moderator: carlson1
So they confiscated the gun(s)?9mmLover wrote:he will be contacting me this week with a 100% answer on the status of the firearm.
he mentioned that, then said it was a false positive, with the serial # 1 letter offrm9792 wrote:Came up stolen.
I would answer him, if you come knocking without a warrant you won't find any guns, with a warrant, you will find however many I have that day.9mmLover wrote:so if i come knocking on your door, ill only find 5 guns right?
exactly. i mean its not like im a dealer or anything. and i barely buy and sell. ive done maybe 20 trades/private sales of both long guns and handguns in the last 6 years that i have had a CHL.Teamless wrote:I would answer him, if you come knocking without a warrant you won't find any guns, with a warrant, you will find however many I have that day.9mmLover wrote:so if i come knocking on your door, ill only find 5 guns right?
We know that the local LEO can disarm CHLer at will. However, cuffing and detaining in the back of the cruiser is as you pointed out is a grey area and something new. I would like to have active LEO comment, if the temp detention is justified and legal. BTW, if the gun that was supposed to sold was a handgun and was seen by LEO, the OP could have been charged with failure to conceal. However, I assume it was not the case. I assume both handguns were in their hard cases, or concealed in a case.Bullwhip wrote:All these replies, nobody pointed out the whole detention was wrong? I support the 4A just as much as the 2A and 1A. No evidence of anything illegal but both are detained and questioned and ATF is involved (looks like ATF has an illegal database too).
The police in this case need to
Not sure how it was wrong.Bullwhip wrote:nobody pointed out the whole detention was wrong?
He probably runs guns to the narco terrorist Mexican cartels.9mmLover wrote:sad part is he had a hispanic accent which was very deep, and im sure he is a legally naturalized citizen just like me. 10 bucks says im on their radar like a mofo now, but i have nothing to hide.
Barbi Q wrote:He probably runs guns to the narco terrorist Mexican cartels.9mmLover wrote:sad part is he had a hispanic accent which was very deep, and im sure he is a legally naturalized citizen just like me. 10 bucks says im on their radar like a mofo now, but i have nothing to hide.
How do you like stereotypes now Mr. Junior G-man?
If you look at the percentage of federal agents involved in the operations that gave guns to the mexican drug gangs, and the percentage of Muslims involved in terrorism, the federal agents seem a lot less trustworthy if you're playing the odds.9mmLover wrote:just because my name is mohammad, it doesnt give you probable cause. thats when i could see him fuming on the inside.
Yes you do because theres' nothing illegal about selling a rifle. No different from pulling over a driver until you can make sure he has a license.Teamless wrote:Not sure how it was wrong.Bullwhip wrote:nobody pointed out the whole detention was wrong?
if the officer thought the law was being broken, he can detain you until he figures out what is going on.
In the end, was it wrong, yes, but in the beginning, when he sees 2 people making a gun deal, well, until you have the facts, do you assume it is all legal? not sure
Don't matter if you were in cuffs. Could you leave? Just say to the other guy, "You know what, I'll call you some other time we can get together then" and walk away? Back of a squad car or in cuffs at the police station in a interview room, its all the same.9mmLover wrote:I wasnt cuffed. Just seperated from the other party and placed in the back of a squad car.