I agree.Texas Dan Mosby wrote:Of course it's possible.Slam fire... in a modern handgun, like a SIG, firing pin block, yata yata tata... possible?
Statistically, however, unintended discharges are more than likely the result of operator negligence, rather than design defects / damaged parts.
This is why regular maintenance and inspection of a firearm is important. With regular maintenance, inspection, and function checks, it is highly likely that an individual can identify potential issues BEFORE they can lead to a possible unintended discharge.
Was there fouling / debris causing the firing pin to stick and protrude through the breech face?
Was there a problem with hammer follow that could have been identified through a normal function check?
Or, was the round simply discharged due to negligent handling techniques of the owner?
Due to the fact that the individual failed to orient the firearm in a safe direction when he sent the slide forward, I am more likely to believe that the discharge occurred due to either negligent handling practices, or maintenance, on his part, rather than on faulty equipment.
Anyone negligent enough to point a firearm (especially one he has just confirmed is loaded) at part of his own body is certainly highly suspect for other negligent or improper practices like oiling the firing pin channel (As G.A. Heath has suggested), failing to periodically clean firing pin debris from the firing pin channel, and other similar errors.
The gun should be examined promptly by a competent Sig armorer to determine what happened before it is loaded again.
This is another good example of some folks' practice of disregarding wisdom accumulated from others' mistakes and insisting on committing the same ones themselves before they get it. The gentleman involved in this case now has personal experience with the reason behind Rule #2 and will hopefully be more likely to follow it in the future.