Taurus Slim

Gun, shooting and equipment discussions unrelated to CHL issues

Moderator: carlson1


HKUSP45C
Member
Posts in topic: 1
Posts: 72
Joined: Thu Jun 07, 2007 6:25 am

Re: Taurus Slim

#16

Post by HKUSP45C »

austinrealtor wrote:If nothing else, maybe this plus the PPS will convince Glock to get off the fence and make a single stack 9mm/.40-cal super-sub-compact (basically a slim Baby Glock).
As an aside, Glock makes "small" guns (a .380 for instance), they just can't import them to the US because of the "point system" regulating foriegn, imported firearms.
Characteristic
Points

Length: for each 1/4" over 6"
1

Forged steel frame
15

Forged HTS alloy frame
20

Unloaded weight w/mag (per oz.)
1

.22 short and .25 auto
0

.22 LR and 7.65mm to .380 auto
3

9mm parabellum and over
10

Locked breech mechanism
5

Loaded chamber indicator
5

Grip safety
3

Magazine safety
5

Firing pin block or lock
10

External hammer
2

Double action
10

Drift adjustable target sight
5

Click adjustable target sight
10

Target grips
5

Target trigger
2

If a pistol doesn't get 75 "points" it can't be legally imported AND the smaller a gun gets the less opportunity it has to get enough "points." I've heard that for many models Glock actually imports them with cheap click adjustable sights which are then swapped stateside just to get a few more points.
User avatar

A-R
Senior Member
Posts in topic: 3
Posts: 5776
Joined: Sun Apr 12, 2009 5:01 pm
Location: Austin area

Re: Taurus Slim

#17

Post by A-R »

HKUSP45C wrote:
austinrealtor wrote:If nothing else, maybe this plus the PPS will convince Glock to get off the fence and make a single stack 9mm/.40-cal super-sub-compact (basically a slim Baby Glock).
As an aside, Glock makes "small" guns (a .380 for instance), they just can't import them to the US because of the "point system" regulating foriegn, imported firearms.
(note: truncated quoted post to save space)

Actually, the Glock .380 pistols are not any different in size from their 9mm/.40/.357 counterparts here in the US, but because the caliber is less than 9mm they lose those 10 points and thus cannot be imported. But both this Taurus Slim AND the Walther PPS are imported, so pistols of this size and caliber are obviously possible for importation. I don't want a smaller-caliber .380 Glock. I want a SLIM Glock, same general dimension specs as this Taurus or the Walther PPS, in 9mm or .40.
User avatar

thankGod
Senior Member
Posts in topic: 1
Posts: 445
Joined: Fri Feb 15, 2008 9:25 am
Location: Beautiful downtown Bearcreek, Houston

Re: Taurus Slim

#18

Post by thankGod »

austinrealtor wrote:[I don't want a smaller-caliber .380 Glock. I want a SLIM Glock, same general dimension specs as this Taurus or the Walther PPS, in 9mm or .40.
I agree. I would like something slim. I've been nosing around for a Kahr PM9 for the past few days, and I did look at the new Taurus Slim. Nice looking little pistol, and less than half the price of the Kahr.
thankGod
NRA Life Member
TSRA
"Be watchful, stand firm in your faith, be courageous, be strong." 1Cor16:13

mr.72
Senior Member
Posts in topic: 4
Posts: 1619
Joined: Tue May 13, 2008 10:14 am

Re: Taurus Slim

#19

Post by mr.72 »

Well the Taurus competes a little more readily with a Kahr CW9 than it does with a PM9. PM9 has a few features over the Taurus that might justify the price. A CW9 is pretty competitive in price.

However, to me the big difference that really separates the Taurus from Kahr pistols is the fact that the Taurus is not DAO, and has a manual safety. Now if Glock were to come out with a single-stack, 0.8" thick version of a G26, then we'd be talking about a competitor to Kahrs & Walther PPS and Kel-Tec PF9.

I need to go handle one of these but the safety is probably a deal-breaker. I don't think it'd be easy to re-train my wife to automatically flip the safety off when all of our other guns are safety-less DAO pistols. I know I don't want to have to re-learn.
non-conformist CHL holder
User avatar

DoubleJ
Senior Member
Posts in topic: 5
Posts: 2367
Joined: Fri Jul 13, 2007 9:29 am
Location: Seattle, Washington

Re: Taurus Slim

#20

Post by DoubleJ »

it's got a Glock-style trigger safety, so in theory you could just roll around with the safety off.
FWIW, IIRC, AFAIK, FTMP, IANAL. YMMV.

mr.72
Senior Member
Posts in topic: 4
Posts: 1619
Joined: Tue May 13, 2008 10:14 am

Re: Taurus Slim

#21

Post by mr.72 »

DoubleJ wrote:it's got a Glock-style trigger safety, so in theory you could just roll around with the safety off.
certainly so but then there is a chance it gets set to "on" accidentally.
non-conformist CHL holder
User avatar

9mmGuy
Senior Member
Posts in topic: 1
Posts: 356
Joined: Wed Jan 17, 2007 4:45 pm
Location: Frisco

Re: Taurus Slim

#22

Post by 9mmGuy »

i cant wait to handle one of these little gems. might have to get one on the x-mas list. i have been looking into a single stack carry piece. Think a holster made for a kahr or similar would fit it?
Luck favors the Prepared
G19c, G26, KT P11, Mossberg Mav 88, 10/22

TexasVet
Senior Member
Posts in topic: 1
Posts: 342
Joined: Fri Aug 01, 2008 1:42 pm

Re: Taurus Slim

#23

Post by TexasVet »

For those looking for a slim Glock.. just take the Walther PPS apart and you'd be surprised how familiar it looks on the inside ;)
User avatar

carlson1
Moderator
Posts in topic: 1
Posts: 11739
Joined: Sat Dec 03, 2005 1:11 am

Re: Taurus Slim

#24

Post by carlson1 »

Image

Sig 232SL is nice and slim. I would like this size in 9mm. As so many others I would like to see a slimmer Glock in 9mm.
Image
User avatar

USA1
Senior Member
Posts in topic: 1
Posts: 7412
Joined: Wed Apr 08, 2009 5:37 pm
Location: Tomball ,Texas
Contact:

Re: Taurus Slim

#25

Post by USA1 »

9mmGuy wrote:i cant wait to handle one of these little gems. might have to get one on the x-mas list. i have been looking into a single stack carry piece. Think a holster made for a kahr or similar would fit it?
hers a holster that will fit a slim
http://www.kholster.com/index.htm
i just ordered one that will fit my Taurus PT 145
Glock Armorer - S&W M&P Armorer
User avatar

ScottDLS
Senior Member
Posts in topic: 1
Posts: 5067
Joined: Sun Jun 26, 2005 1:04 am
Location: DFW Area, TX

Re: Taurus Slim

#26

Post by ScottDLS »

I just can't seem to take to these "plastic" guns. It's just personal preference. I want blue or shiny metal. Dad (69) bought a Glock 17 for home defense. Good gun, but unloaded it feels like a Barbie pistol.

Slim seems like a neat carry pistol, but I like the stainless PPK/s better (except for the fact that it jams 5% of the time(arrgh..!). Switched to a Ruger SP101 .357 snubbie for carry. Now there's some heavy metal. Feels like a brick.

Sometimes I'm just conflicted. If we had "open carry" I'd carry a full size 1911 cocked and locked or a Beretta 92SF. Concealed, I pine for a reliable pocket sized steel .380 or 9mm.

Maybe I'll have to get a Lorcin .25 or a Raven. :???:
4/13/1996 Completed CHL Class, 4/16/1996 Fingerprints, Affidavits, and Application Mailed, 10/4/1996 Received CHL, renewed 1998, 2002, 2006, 2011, 2016...). "ATF... Uhhh...heh...heh....Alcohol, tobacco, and GUNS!! Cool!!!!"
User avatar

joe817
Senior Member
Posts in topic: 1
Posts: 9316
Joined: Fri May 22, 2009 7:13 pm
Location: Arlington

Re: Taurus Slim

#27

Post by joe817 »

ScottDLS wrote:I just can't seem to take to these "plastic" guns. It's just personal preference. I want blue or shiny metal. Dad (69) bought a Glock 17 for home defense. Good gun, but unloaded it feels like a Barbie pistol.

Slim seems like a neat carry pistol, but I like the stainless PPK/s better (except for the fact that it jams 5% of the time(arrgh..!). Switched to a Ruger SP101 .357 snubbie for carry. Now there's some heavy metal. Feels like a brick.

Sometimes I'm just conflicted. If we had "open carry" I'd carry a full size 1911 cocked and locked or a Beretta 92SF. Concealed, I pine for a reliable pocket sized steel .380 or 9mm.

Maybe I'll have to get a Lorcin .25 or a Raven. :???:
I hear that if you turn in a Kroger $50 gift card to the Dallas PD, they'll give you a Lorcin or Raven in return! "rlol" :lol: :smilelol5:
Diplomacy is the Art of Letting Someone Have Your Way
TSRA
Colt Gov't Model .380
User avatar

DoubleJ
Senior Member
Posts in topic: 5
Posts: 2367
Joined: Fri Jul 13, 2007 9:29 am
Location: Seattle, Washington

Re: Taurus Slim

#28

Post by DoubleJ »

ScottDLS wrote:I just can't seem to take to these "plastic" guns. It's just personal preference. I want blue or shiny metal. Dad (69) bought a Glock 17 for home defense. Good gun, but unloaded it feels like a Barbie pistol.

Slim seems like a neat carry pistol, but I like the stainless PPK/s better (except for the fact that it jams 5% of the time(arrgh..!). Switched to a Ruger SP101 .357 snubbie for carry. Now there's some heavy metal. Feels like a brick.

Sometimes I'm just conflicted. If we had "open carry" I'd carry a full size 1911 cocked and locked or a Beretta 92SF. Concealed, I pine for a reliable pocket sized steel .380 or 9mm.

Maybe I'll have to get a Lorcin .25 or a Raven. :???:
I'll take my "barbie" gun that doesn't jam at all.

kthxbye

besides, I can wear this while I work out, and no one's the wiser, and it doesn't weigh a brick!
FWIW, IIRC, AFAIK, FTMP, IANAL. YMMV.
Post Reply

Return to “General Gun, Shooting & Equipment Discussion”