Looks like he has a point in this case and there are pictures to back him up.pedalman wrote:Shhhh!!!!! Not so loud.
We don't want to get Dean Spier all riled up again.
Is anyone willing to chamber and fire this round in their Glock?
Moderator: carlson1
Looks like he has a point in this case and there are pictures to back him up.pedalman wrote:Shhhh!!!!! Not so loud.
We don't want to get Dean Spier all riled up again.
The Annoyed Man wrote:What's the bullet weight on those .40s of yours? I carry the 180 grain Hydro-Shoks in my USP Compact, and I've never seen a measureable setback after multiple cyclings. The 180s have a more truncated cone shape than the ones you've shown here in your OP. That's the only reason I haven't just shot the ammo and got more. And trying to find reasonably priced self defense ammo in .40 these days is harder than it needs to be.
My .45 Hydro-Shoks setback a bit also. I probably only cycled it 4 or 5 times. It looked just like the pic in the OP.The Annoyed Man wrote:What's the bullet weight on those .40s of yours? I carry the 180 grain Hydro-Shoks in my USP Compact, and I've never seen a measureable setback after multiple cyclings. The 180s have a more truncated cone shape than the ones you've shown here in your OP. That's the only reason I haven't just shot the ammo and got more. And trying to find reasonably priced self defense ammo in .40 these days is harder than it needs to be.