Ouch.... Smith and Wesson stocks take a 28% dive

Gun, shooting and equipment discussions unrelated to CHL issues

Moderator: carlson1


Topic author
Kyle(Houston)
Member
Posts in topic: 2
Posts: 106
Joined: Wed Sep 12, 2007 1:31 pm
Location: Spring
Contact:

Ouch.... Smith and Wesson stocks take a 28% dive

#1

Post by Kyle(Houston) »

http://ir.smith-wesson.com/phoenix.zhtm ... QuoteChart

Not sure why I just heard it on the radio.

What a bad day for them :shock:
"Anything worth shooting is worth shooting twice. Ammo is cheap. Life is expensive."

casingpoint
Senior Member
Posts in topic: 1
Posts: 1447
Joined: Sat Dec 09, 2006 9:53 pm

#2

Post by casingpoint »

"What a bad day for them"

Everybody and his brother done told 'em to get rid of that infernal lock.

Topic author
Kyle(Houston)
Member
Posts in topic: 2
Posts: 106
Joined: Wed Sep 12, 2007 1:31 pm
Location: Spring
Contact:

#3

Post by Kyle(Houston) »

casingpoint wrote:Everybody and his brother done told 'em to get rid of that infernal lock.
:lol: :lol: :lol:
"Anything worth shooting is worth shooting twice. Ammo is cheap. Life is expensive."

Xander
Senior Member
Posts in topic: 2
Posts: 766
Joined: Fri Jun 01, 2007 11:27 am
Location: Plano
Contact:

#4

Post by Xander »

Their stock was downgraded by three analyst firms...That's what caused the drop.

http://www.thestreet.com/s/fridays-winn ... 540_2.html

Xander
Senior Member
Posts in topic: 2
Posts: 766
Joined: Fri Jun 01, 2007 11:27 am
Location: Plano
Contact:

#5

Post by Xander »

casingpoint wrote:
Everybody and his brother done told 'em to get rid of that infernal lock.
And yes, they should. :lol:

lawrnk
Senior Member
Posts in topic: 2
Posts: 1585
Joined: Mon Aug 13, 2007 11:36 am
Location: Sienna Plantation, TX (FT BEND)

#6

Post by lawrnk »

Xander wrote:Their stock was downgraded by three analyst firms...That's what caused the drop.

http://www.thestreet.com/s/fridays-winn ... 540_2.html
Maybe the member of this firm fired a sigma for the first time? :lol: ;-)
Member- TSRA
Life Member- NRA

Snake Doctor
Senior Member
Posts in topic: 1
Posts: 209
Joined: Fri Sep 21, 2007 4:47 pm
Location: Austin

#7

Post by Snake Doctor »

lawrnk wrote:
Xander wrote:Their stock was downgraded by three analyst firms...That's what caused the drop.

http://www.thestreet.com/s/fridays-winn ... 540_2.html
Maybe the member of this firm fired a sigma for the first time? :lol: ;-)
Hehehehehehe....
Nemo me impune lacessit.

FightinAggieCHL
Member
Posts in topic: 1
Posts: 146
Joined: Mon Nov 26, 2007 1:20 am
Location: College Station, TX
Contact:

#8

Post by FightinAggieCHL »

Hey! I like my Sigma!

:blowup
The right to bear arms shall NOT be infringed.

Always cheat; always win. The only unfair fight is the one you lose.

jrosto
Senior Member
Posts in topic: 1
Posts: 216
Joined: Tue Oct 17, 2006 6:30 pm
Location: Arlington
Contact:

#9

Post by jrosto »

SPRINGFIELD, Mass., Dec. 6 /PRNewswire-FirstCall/ -- Smith & Wesson Holding Corporation (Nasdaq: SWHC), parent company of Smith & Wesson Corp., the legendary 155-year old company in the global business of safety, security, protection and sport, today announced financial results for its second fiscal quarter ended October 31, 2007.

Net product sales for the quarter ended October 31, 2007 were $70.8
million, an increase of 39.4% over the comparable quarter last year. Gross margin increased to 32.3% for the quarter ended October 31, 2007 as compared to 31.2% for the same period last year.
Does not sound like they are doing to awful bad to me.

Smith & Wesson Holding Corporation Posts Second Quarter Net Sales and Profits
"No arsenal or no weapon in the arsenals of the world is so formidable as the will and moral courage of free men and women." Ronald Reagan

Rex B
Senior Member
Posts in topic: 1
Posts: 3615
Joined: Thu Jul 06, 2006 3:30 pm
Location: DFW

Ruger too

#10

Post by Rex B »

Heck, Ruger took a 50% price dump about a month ago. Still have not recovered.

They reported their first losing quarter in a long, long time, and further reported there would probably be a few more quarters before they found some black ink.
-----------
“Sometimes there is no alternative to uncertainty except to await the arrival of more and better data.” C. Wunsch

seeker_two
Banned
Posts in topic: 1
Posts: 182
Joined: Fri Oct 26, 2007 11:19 am
Location: Deep in the Heart of the Lone Star State

#11

Post by seeker_two »

Xander wrote:Their stock was downgraded by three analyst firms...That's what caused the drop.

http://www.thestreet.com/s/fridays-winn ... 540_2.html
Analysts like this are the reason we're paying $3+ a gallon for gas while oil and refinery production are at a surplus and demand is lower than when gas was half this price.....

...God save us from "analysts" and "experts"..... :roll:
Howdy y'all. Glad to be here.....
User avatar

Lumberjack98
Senior Member
Posts in topic: 1
Posts: 1280
Joined: Thu Jul 07, 2005 4:15 pm
Location: Katy

#12

Post by Lumberjack98 »

From The Shooting Wire Newsletter:

Shooting Business Attracts Attention

Forbes' analyst Carl Gutierrez said it all: "Smith & Wesson ate lead Friday."

In October, S&W stock (nasdaq:SWHC) dropped its 2008 forecasts, admitting to the equities markets that their gangbuster numbers for 2007 couldn't be maintained going into 2008. For that announcement, S&W stock took a pounding, dropping from its near-record high to a considerably more modest number. It has been trading in those more moderate ranges since then, dropping back to a level analysts told The Shooting Wire they felt could be "maintained, barring no more bad news."

Thursday, after the market close, Smith & Wesson announced larger second-quarter earning and sales than analysts had expected (good news), but cut the 2008 projections for the second time. The drop to a forecast of 40 cents per share earnings instead of the 52 cents average estimated (expected) by analysts wasn't well received at all.

On Friday, large investors sent Smith & Wesson a message: "We don't like surprises" -sending shares down more than twenty-nine percent to a closing price of $7.08.

Following Wall Street's activities is equivalent of fortune-telling. If your quarterly earnings improve (S&W's did- from $2.85 to $2.9 million), but your forward projections drop, they hammer you. Ditto if sales are up ($71.4 million vs $51.4 million).

Wall Street analysts, not the most forthcoming of souls to outsiders, say they're watching the stock closely to see if the arrival of a late winter does, in fact, send hunters into the field. The company says it has seen long gun sales lagging due to unseasonably warm weather - hurting the hunting market, primarily their sales of Thompson/Center product and their new i-Bolt bolt rifle in the S&W line.

Two of the analysts we spoke with say they're pleased at the reception law-enforcement is giving the M&P product line. Smith & Wesson has won 80% of the law-enforcement evaluation tests in which it has competed, with sales to 264 law enforcement agencies across the country.

But the analysts point to the late deliveries on the iBolt (September) as one reason they're concerned. Cowen & Co. analyst Cai von Rumorh says retailers he's talking with tell him they're overstocked- to the point that one "big box" retailer cancelled an order on the new rifles for that reason.

A little more than a week ago, Smith & Wesson made some cutbacks in personnel, primarily temporary workers, and slowed production. They're not the only manufacturer in the industry to have done that - and others will undoubtedly follow suit - most likely in the first quarter of next year. S&W explains the layoffs as a normal part of their business. The majority of the workers, after all, were temporary workers.

The company may also be guilty of bad judgment when it rolled out - en-masse - a very aggressive menu of sales incentives. In those programs, sales of new products enabled purchasers to get a second gun from S&W's more-established lines for very little additional money. Some retailers told The Shooting Wire the sales incentives were an attempt to bolster softening sales -and appreciated- but the paperwork involved was not something they were welcoming with open arms.

Much of that grumbling is predictable when any new procedure is introduced by any manufacturer. Like gunmakers, firearms retailers are sometimes slow to embrace any change in long-established procedures. "It's always been done this way," is not an unexpected response to any change.

Like Sturm, Ruger & Company, Smith & Wesson is being hammered for events that haven't yet happened. That's one of the high prices you pay for playing in the equities market. Another is the fact that you have to be concerned with quarterly numbers when you probably should be looking far further down the road. Again, that's part of the cost of equities. Most disconcerting may be the realization that publicly-traded firearms manufacturers are doing business in a marketplace where the experts don't mind your making them money, but never miss an opportunity to hammer you philosophically.

As the stock markets open this morning, like always, we'll keep you posted.

--Jim Shepherd
NRA Lifetime Member
TSRA Lifetime Member

Shootstir
Junior Member
Posts in topic: 1
Posts: 23
Joined: Thu Dec 06, 2007 2:59 pm
Location: Abilene, TX.

#13

Post by Shootstir »

casingpoint wrote:"What a bad day for them"

Everybody and his brother done told 'em to get rid of that infernal lock.
I don't know about anyone else, but when they made their deal with the Clinton Administration many years ago, I vowed to never own one of these guns- or any of their products. Many other models and companies have served my purposes and needs through the years.

I don't need to own a product from a company that sells out to the Left wing at the first sign of trouble. My two cents...
NRA Lifemember
Kimber Pro Carry
(.45ACP)
CHL circa 1998

"If it comes at you snarling with tooth and claw, it's better to empty the magazine before asking questions."

lawrnk
Senior Member
Posts in topic: 2
Posts: 1585
Joined: Mon Aug 13, 2007 11:36 am
Location: Sienna Plantation, TX (FT BEND)

Re:

#14

Post by lawrnk »

Shootstir wrote:
casingpoint wrote:"What a bad day for them"

Everybody and his brother done told 'em to get rid of that infernal lock.
I don't know about anyone else, but when they made their deal with the Clinton Administration many years ago, I vowed to never own one of these guns- or any of their products. Many other models and companies have served my purposes and needs through the years.

I don't need to own a product from a company that sells out to the Left wing at the first sign of trouble. My two cents...
Good point. I already had 2 reasons not to like S&W. Now I have 3.
Member- TSRA
Life Member- NRA
User avatar

M9FAN
Senior Member
Posts in topic: 1
Posts: 538
Joined: Wed Nov 07, 2007 1:17 pm
Location: Pearland, TX

Re:

#15

Post by M9FAN »

FightinAggieCHL wrote:Hey! I like my Sigma!

:blowup
+1
"Upon the conduct of each depends the fate of all." - Alexander the Great
Post Reply

Return to “General Gun, Shooting & Equipment Discussion”