I agree.I would let it go. A box of hollow points 20-30 bucks. It's not worth the trouble, choose your battles wisely. Rico
Hollow Point Amunition
Moderator: carlson1
-
- Senior Member
- Posts in topic: 1
- Posts: 5298
- Joined: Sat Dec 16, 2006 8:27 pm
- Location: Luling, TX
I agree that you should choose your battles wisely, but I do not see this as a battle. The officer was wrong to keep the ammo.
The best way to handle this, IMHO, is to visit the Chief and ask him to clarify with the officers what the laws on weapons are. You could also ask the Chief if there is a policy on ammo, and again, ask for it to be explained to the officer. This way, you are assuming, and the Chief will be more likely to agree, that it was a misunderstanding and not a criminal act.
There are two reasons I say to do it this way. The first is the old saying: Never attribute to evil that which is explainable by stupidity. The officer may really have been a thief, or he could have recently moved down here from New Jersey and not yet realize our attitudes are very different. It truly could be an honest mistake.
Second, there is another old philosophy that you catch more flies with honey than with vinegar. By assuming the innocent mistake, the Chief is not having the department look nearly as bad and is much more likely to be receptive to the discussion. If it turns out it was a mistake, you have contributed to improving the department through the education process. If it turns out to be a theft, the Chief will know and find out and be able to handle the situation. In the latter case, the Chief will let you know and ask for a formal complaint UNLESS the whole department is corrupt. There is a small possibility of this being true, but I would not want to bet on it being true.
The best way to handle this, IMHO, is to visit the Chief and ask him to clarify with the officers what the laws on weapons are. You could also ask the Chief if there is a policy on ammo, and again, ask for it to be explained to the officer. This way, you are assuming, and the Chief will be more likely to agree, that it was a misunderstanding and not a criminal act.
There are two reasons I say to do it this way. The first is the old saying: Never attribute to evil that which is explainable by stupidity. The officer may really have been a thief, or he could have recently moved down here from New Jersey and not yet realize our attitudes are very different. It truly could be an honest mistake.
Second, there is another old philosophy that you catch more flies with honey than with vinegar. By assuming the innocent mistake, the Chief is not having the department look nearly as bad and is much more likely to be receptive to the discussion. If it turns out it was a mistake, you have contributed to improving the department through the education process. If it turns out to be a theft, the Chief will know and find out and be able to handle the situation. In the latter case, the Chief will let you know and ask for a formal complaint UNLESS the whole department is corrupt. There is a small possibility of this being true, but I would not want to bet on it being true.
Steve Rothstein
-
- Senior Member
- Posts in topic: 3
- Posts: 766
- Joined: Fri Jun 01, 2007 11:27 am
- Location: Plano
- Contact:
srothstein wrote:I agree that you should choose your battles wisely, but I do not see this as a battle. The officer was wrong to keep the ammo.
The best way to handle this, IMHO, is to visit the Chief and ask him to clarify with the officers what the laws on weapons are. You could also ask the Chief if there is a policy on ammo, and again, ask for it to be explained to the officer. This way, you are assuming, and the Chief will be more likely to agree, that it was a misunderstanding and not a criminal act.
There are two reasons I say to do it this way. The first is the old saying: Never attribute to evil that which is explainable by stupidity. The officer may really have been a thief, or he could have recently moved down here from New Jersey and not yet realize our attitudes are very different. It truly could be an honest mistake.
Second, there is another old philosophy that you catch more flies with honey than with vinegar. By assuming the innocent mistake, the Chief is not having the department look nearly as bad and is much more likely to be receptive to the discussion. If it turns out it was a mistake, you have contributed to improving the department through the education process. If it turns out to be a theft, the Chief will know and find out and be able to handle the situation. In the latter case, the Chief will let you know and ask for a formal complaint UNLESS the whole department is corrupt. There is a small possibility of this being true, but I would not want to bet on it being true.
Sounds like you ran into someone whos probably new to his job and didnt know what he was talking about...but instead of asking questions and risk looking foolish he decided to just go ahead and pretend he knew what he was doing. I seriously doubt he STOLE your ammo, but i would probably contact the department and ask some questions
USAF
SSgt, Combat Arms
NRA Member
ND CCL Holder
"I've got a firm policy on gun control. If there's a gun around, I want to be the one controlling it." -Clint Eastwood
Μολών λαβέ!
Sadly I lost all my guns in a boating accident in the Gulf of Mexico :(
SSgt, Combat Arms
NRA Member
ND CCL Holder
"I've got a firm policy on gun control. If there's a gun around, I want to be the one controlling it." -Clint Eastwood
Μολών λαβέ!
Sadly I lost all my guns in a boating accident in the Gulf of Mexico :(
-
- Senior Member
- Posts in topic: 4
- Posts: 6343
- Joined: Mon Jul 03, 2006 8:49 pm
- Location: Galveston
- Contact:
I would be willing to make a bet that the officers in the suspected department have to buy their own bullets. I would also bet the officers use hollow points (therefore knowing that they are legal) I also would bet the ammo isn't in a property or evidence room.txinvestigator wrote:Someone has been reading specific statutes (dispossesed). lolseamusTX wrote:I agree. It may be department policy.txinvestigator wrote:Its quite a jump to assume he stole them.
But do you agree that, if this account is accurate, a citizen was dispossessed of his property for no legitimate reason?
- Jim
To answer your question; probably. Since there was nothing illegal about the bullets I can't see why they were not returned. That is why I suggested a visit to the Chief's office. ;)
Liberty''s Blog
"Today, we need a nation of Minutemen, citizens who are not only prepared to take arms, but citizens who regard the preservation of freedom as the basic purpose of their daily life and who are willing to consciously work and sacrifice for that freedom." John F. Kennedy
"Today, we need a nation of Minutemen, citizens who are not only prepared to take arms, but citizens who regard the preservation of freedom as the basic purpose of their daily life and who are willing to consciously work and sacrifice for that freedom." John F. Kennedy
-
- Senior Member
- Posts in topic: 1
- Posts: 1447
- Joined: Sat Dec 09, 2006 9:53 pm
-
- Senior Member
- Posts in topic: 1
- Posts: 7875
- Joined: Fri Apr 01, 2005 9:16 am
- Location: Richmond, Texas
Why would that be a "standard practice"?5111 wrote:I thought that it was standard practice to not return ammunition for any gun that was taken into "custody".
Makes no sense to me.
This should be addressed with the chief and the officer should be informed of what the law actually is. Yelling "Thief!" is not really proper. In every profession there are those who are misinformed and who make mistakes.
Anygun
"When democracy turns to tyranny, the armed citizen still gets to vote." Mike Vanderboegh
"The Smallest Minority on earth is the individual. Those who deny individual rights cannot claim to be defenders of minorities." – Ayn Rand
"The Smallest Minority on earth is the individual. Those who deny individual rights cannot claim to be defenders of minorities." – Ayn Rand
-
- Member
- Posts in topic: 3
- Posts: 65
- Joined: Sat Apr 07, 2007 5:05 pm
-
- Senior Member
- Posts in topic: 2
- Posts: 1394
- Joined: Mon Aug 08, 2005 2:03 pm
- Location: Central TX, just west of Austin
Hmmm . . . let's see . . . the ammunition was legal, so the officer took legally-owned property that wasn't his. Figuring theft is no jump at all, but a reasonable conclusion, assuming the post is accurate. (A police officer - a trained professional - in Texas knows that HP ammo is legal - unless he's got a double-digit IQ. In which case he shouldn't be a cop at all.)txinvestigator wrote:Its quite a jump to assume he stole them. And the LEOs I know would agree.HankB wrote:Sounds like some cop had an "Oh, gee, I can use these" moment.
I'd go back to the police station (or is the department big enought to have an IA office?) and file a formal complaint against the officer for theft. Nothing may come of it, but if enough of these accumulate in his jacket, it they may eventually come back and bite him.
Few things bother me more than crooked LEOs. (And the LEOs I know would agree.)
Few things bother me more than people who jump to conclusions.
If the ammo was properly logged into the evidence room, then the owner can, after speaking to the chief, recover it. (Unless department policy calls for theft, in which case there's a bigger problem.)
If the ammo was NOT properly logged into the evidence room, then it IS a case of theft on the part of the officer. And a formal complaint should be filed.
Probably not worth suing over, but again, if enough complaints accumulate in the officer's jacket, they'll come back and bite him sometime.
Original CHL: 2000: 56 day turnaround
1st renewal, 2004: 34 days
2nd renewal, 2008: 81 days
3rd renewal, 2013: 12 days
1st renewal, 2004: 34 days
2nd renewal, 2008: 81 days
3rd renewal, 2013: 12 days
-
- Senior Member
- Posts in topic: 1
- Posts: 7590
- Joined: Fri Mar 04, 2005 11:17 pm
- Location: 77504
+1txinvestigator wrote:It may be policy to destroy or not return ammo, I don't know. It sounds like someone who can't explain policy just made something up.
HP ammo is not illegal in Texas. He should go back and nicely ask to see or be referenced to said law, as he wants to be sure to comply. However, I would be asking in the Chief's office.
Ask nicely...Whether it is ammunition for a handgun, or an atomic device, if it is legal for you to possess, and its your property, it should be returned, or restitution should be sought...
You only had you property stolen, and when it was recovered should ALL have been returned to you...
"Perseverance and Preparedness triumph over Procrastination and Paranoia every time.” -- Steve
NRA - Life Member
"Quis custodiet ipsos custodes?"
Μολών λαβέ!
NRA - Life Member
"Quis custodiet ipsos custodes?"
Μολών λαβέ!
-
- Senior Member
- Posts in topic: 5
- Posts: 4331
- Joined: Wed May 04, 2005 6:40 pm
- Location: DFW area
- Contact:
Thats an awfully big chip you have there.Liberty wrote:I would be willing to make a bet that the officers in the suspected department have to buy their own bullets. I would also bet the officers use hollow points (therefore knowing that they are legal) I also would bet the ammo isn't in a property or evidence room.txinvestigator wrote:Someone has been reading specific statutes (dispossesed). lolseamusTX wrote:I agree. It may be department policy.txinvestigator wrote:Its quite a jump to assume he stole them.
But do you agree that, if this account is accurate, a citizen was dispossessed of his property for no legitimate reason?
- Jim
To answer your question; probably. Since there was nothing illegal about the bullets I can't see why they were not returned. That is why I suggested a visit to the Chief's office. ;)
*CHL Instructor*
"Speed is Fine, but accuracy is final"- Bill Jordan
Remember those who died, remember those who killed them.
"Speed is Fine, but accuracy is final"- Bill Jordan
Remember those who died, remember those who killed them.