Threat Question

Most CHL/LEO contacts are positive, how about yours? Bloopers are fun, but no names please, if it will cause a LEO problems!

Moderators: carlson1, Keith B

Considering the question in post 1, what is your opinion

Yes
2
3%
No
71
97%
 
Total votes: 73


speedsix
Senior Member
Posts in topic: 1
Posts: 5608
Joined: Tue Jan 18, 2011 8:39 am

Re: Threat Question

#31

Post by speedsix »

...in the jungle, the elephant sits where it wants to...I doubt that the Federal government will end up saying "Oh, we're sorry, we were wrong"...they may end up dropping the charges...with recriminations for those who were loudest in protest...

Topic author
Originalist
Senior Member
Posts in topic: 11
Posts: 463
Joined: Tue Aug 22, 2006 3:32 pm
Location: San Antonio, Texas

Re: Threat Question

#32

Post by Originalist »

The Annoyed Man wrote:
Originalist wrote:If I posted a picture of the profile (side view) of my handgun on my facebook page with the title of "my sleeping buddy tonight" could that be considered a violation of Texas Law?
I mean absolutely no disrespect, and please forgive my ignorance, but what possible law could that violate?
TAM, that is my question as well.....
US Air Force Security Forces Craftsman
Glock 27/22
Remington Model 770 .270/Escort Magnum SA 12 gauge Shotgun/Olympic Arm AR-15
Project One Million: Texas - Get Involved!
User avatar

WildBill
Senior Member
Posts in topic: 2
Posts: 17350
Joined: Tue Jul 03, 2007 12:53 pm
Location: Houston

Re: Threat Question

#33

Post by WildBill »

Originalist wrote:
The Annoyed Man wrote:
Originalist wrote:If I posted a picture of the profile (side view) of my handgun on my facebook page with the title of "my sleeping buddy tonight" could that be considered a violation of Texas Law?
I mean absolutely no disrespect, and please forgive my ignorance, but what possible law could that violate?
TAM, that is my question as well.....
Would posting the gun facing the muzzle [front view] be any different?
NRA Endowment Member

Topic author
Originalist
Senior Member
Posts in topic: 11
Posts: 463
Joined: Tue Aug 22, 2006 3:32 pm
Location: San Antonio, Texas

Re: Threat Question

#34

Post by Originalist »

WildBill wrote:
Originalist wrote:
The Annoyed Man wrote:
Originalist wrote:If I posted a picture of the profile (side view) of my handgun on my facebook page with the title of "my sleeping buddy tonight" could that be considered a violation of Texas Law?
I mean absolutely no disrespect, and please forgive my ignorance, but what possible law could that violate?
TAM, that is my question as well.....
Would posting the gun facing the muzzle [front view] be any different?
Not in my opinion... but I wanted to post the exact circumstance,
US Air Force Security Forces Craftsman
Glock 27/22
Remington Model 770 .270/Escort Magnum SA 12 gauge Shotgun/Olympic Arm AR-15
Project One Million: Texas - Get Involved!
User avatar

WildBill
Senior Member
Posts in topic: 2
Posts: 17350
Joined: Tue Jul 03, 2007 12:53 pm
Location: Houston

Re: Threat Question

#35

Post by WildBill »

The Annoyed Man wrote:
Originalist wrote:If I posted a picture of the profile (side view) of my handgun on my facebook page with the title of "my sleeping buddy tonight" could that be considered a violation of Texas Law?
I mean absolutely no disrespect, and please forgive my ignorance, but what possible law could that violate?
The posting isn't a crime, but if you were a convicted felon, you could be confessing to possession of a firearm. That would be probable cause for a search warrant and subsequent arrest. :smash:
NRA Endowment Member

PBratton
Senior Member
Posts in topic: 2
Posts: 1487
Joined: Mon Feb 16, 2009 7:47 pm
Location: Sugar Land, Texas

Re: Threat Question

#36

Post by PBratton »

JJVP wrote:
JP171 wrote:
JJVP wrote:
PBratton wrote:
AFCop wrote:If I posted a picture of the profile (side view) of my handgun on my facebook page with the title of "my sleeping buddy tonight" could that be considered a violation of Texas Law?
Is it over 18 years of age?
Actually 17 in TX.

actually no it is 18 years of age, not 17

if it was a military individual in military housing they are gonna pay the price, DOD restricts firearms as being a harzard and should be maintained by either a rod and gun club or within the armory, they can enforce this in any manner they choose, they can go thru the federal law system or under UCMJ and make it stick.
Actually no it is 17.

http://www.legalmatch.com/law-library/a ... wyers.html" onclick="window.open(this.href);return false;

http://www.dallascriminaldefenselawyerb ... t-law.html" onclick="window.open(this.href);return false;

http://age-of-consent.findthedata.org/c ... a-vs-Texas" onclick="window.open(this.href);return false;

Oh My Gosh!!!

It was just a pun... I withdraw my remark.
http://www.GeeksFirearms.com NFA dealer.
$25 Transfers in the Sugar Land, Richmond/Rosenburg areas, every 25th transfer I process is free

Active Military, Veterans, Law Enforcement, Fire, EMS receive $15 transfers.

NRA Patron Member, NRA Certified Pistol Instructor, NRA Certified CRSO, Tx LTC Instructor

Topic author
Originalist
Senior Member
Posts in topic: 11
Posts: 463
Joined: Tue Aug 22, 2006 3:32 pm
Location: San Antonio, Texas

Re: Threat Question

#37

Post by Originalist »

WildBill wrote:
The Annoyed Man wrote:
Originalist wrote:If I posted a picture of the profile (side view) of my handgun on my facebook page with the title of "my sleeping buddy tonight" could that be considered a violation of Texas Law?
I mean absolutely no disrespect, and please forgive my ignorance, but what possible law could that violate?
The posting isn't a crime, but if you were a convicted felon, you could be confessing to possession of a firearm. That would be probable cause for a search warrant and subsequent arrest. :smash:

No felon....
US Air Force Security Forces Craftsman
Glock 27/22
Remington Model 770 .270/Escort Magnum SA 12 gauge Shotgun/Olympic Arm AR-15
Project One Million: Texas - Get Involved!

Taggart
Junior Member
Posts in topic: 1
Posts: 14
Joined: Fri Dec 16, 2011 9:54 pm

Re: Threat Question

#38

Post by Taggart »

Originalist wrote:
MoJo wrote:Why do you think posting a picture of your gun with any caption be in violation of Texas Law?
Hoping for some good dialogue I could use in explaining why it isnt...
"Congress shall make no law respecting an establishment of religion, or prohibiting the free exercise thereof; or abridging the freedom of speech, or of the press; or the right of the people peaceably to assemble, and to petition the Government for a redress of grievances."

Topic author
Originalist
Senior Member
Posts in topic: 11
Posts: 463
Joined: Tue Aug 22, 2006 3:32 pm
Location: San Antonio, Texas

Re: Threat Question

#39

Post by Originalist »

Taggart wrote:
Originalist wrote:
MoJo wrote:Why do you think posting a picture of your gun with any caption be in violation of Texas Law?
Hoping for some good dialogue I could use in explaining why it isnt...
"Congress shall make no law respecting an establishment of religion, or prohibiting the free exercise thereof; or abridging the freedom of speech, or of the press; or the right of the people peaceably to assemble, and to petition the Government for a redress of grievances."
:iagree: with this as well...
US Air Force Security Forces Craftsman
Glock 27/22
Remington Model 770 .270/Escort Magnum SA 12 gauge Shotgun/Olympic Arm AR-15
Project One Million: Texas - Get Involved!
User avatar

E.Marquez
Senior Member
Posts in topic: 2
Posts: 2781
Joined: Sat Feb 20, 2010 11:48 pm
Location: Kempner
Contact:

Re: Threat Question

#40

Post by E.Marquez »

There is no such DOD regulation that I am aware of, never seen it, nor seen it cited, referred to..

if you believe you know of such a DOD reg, please post it.

a Post commander (Army, no idea what the AF is doing these days) can and has made such silly regulations, and they are over turned by JAG, and or changed as soon as that commander PCS's if not sooner.

JP171 wrote: if it was a military individual in military housing they are gonna pay the price,
DOD restricts firearms as being a harzard and should be maintained by either a rod and gun club or within the armory,
they can enforce this in any manner they choose, they can go thru the federal law system or under UCMJ and make it stick.
Last edited by E.Marquez on Mon Apr 30, 2012 5:06 pm, edited 1 time in total.
Companion animal Microchips, quality name brand chips, lifetime registration, Low cost just $10~12, not for profit, most locations we can come to you. We cover eight counties McLennan, Hill, Bell, Coryell, Falls, Bosque, Limestone, Lampasas
Contact we.chip.pets@gmail.com
User avatar

MasterOfNone
Senior Member
Posts in topic: 1
Posts: 1276
Joined: Mon Dec 06, 2010 12:00 am
Location: Dallas
Contact:

Re: Threat Question

#41

Post by MasterOfNone »

WildBill wrote:
Originalist wrote:
The Annoyed Man wrote:
Originalist wrote:If I posted a picture of the profile (side view) of my handgun on my facebook page with the title of "my sleeping buddy tonight" could that be considered a violation of Texas Law?
I mean absolutely no disrespect, and please forgive my ignorance, but what possible law could that violate?
TAM, that is my question as well.....
Would posting the gun facing the muzzle [front view] be any different?
Only for the photographer.
http://www.PersonalPerimeter.com
DFW area LTC Instructor
NRA Pistol Instructor, Range Safety Officer, Recruiter

JP171
Banned
Posts in topic: 2
Posts: 1406
Joined: Tue Apr 05, 2011 5:47 am
Location: San Leon Texas

Re: Threat Question

#42

Post by JP171 »

AR-190-11 directs post commanders to establish the program for safe and secure storage of all weapons possessed by anyone on post to include military housing as well as all military pesonnel in the civilian sector.

so therefore JAG cannot circumvent this regulation as it also provides for punitive action for refusal or circumvetion of this regulation. all military installations have a weapons possession policy that is currently in effect. this regulation is mirrored by all branches secondary to a DOD requirement.
User avatar

E.Marquez
Senior Member
Posts in topic: 2
Posts: 2781
Joined: Sat Feb 20, 2010 11:48 pm
Location: Kempner
Contact:

Re: Threat Question

#43

Post by E.Marquez »

JP171 wrote:AR-190-11 directs post commanders to establish the program for safe and secure storage of all weapons possessed by anyone on post to include military housing as well as all military pesonnel in the civilian sector.

so therefore JAG cannot circumvent this regulation as it also provides for punitive action for refusal or circumvetion of this regulation. all military installations have a weapons possession policy that is currently in effect. this regulation is mirrored by all branches secondary to a DOD requirement.
All true, and nothing in AR-190-11 requires weapons to "should be maintained by either a rod and gun club or within the armory,"

Thank you for supporting my point, there is no such regulation as implied in that post. :cheers2:

In Example, on Fort Hood, current policy; FH-190-11 states in part "Firearms can be stored in Family housing, bachelor officers' quarters
(BOQ), or bachelor enlisted quarters (BEQ) by authorized occupants."

IF, the military persons in question are service members living in the barracks, then, yes, they must be stored otherwise "Military personnel who reside in troop billets or transient quarters shall and immediately store firearms and weapons in the unit arms room.

:tiphat:
Companion animal Microchips, quality name brand chips, lifetime registration, Low cost just $10~12, not for profit, most locations we can come to you. We cover eight counties McLennan, Hill, Bell, Coryell, Falls, Bosque, Limestone, Lampasas
Contact we.chip.pets@gmail.com
User avatar

The Mad Moderate
Senior Member
Posts in topic: 1
Posts: 872
Joined: Tue Nov 23, 2010 11:31 am
Location: Marble Falls

Re: Threat Question

#44

Post by The Mad Moderate »

Beiruty wrote:I am breaking Brady law, D.C. law, NY law, and Chicago law, but NOT Canadian law, nor US Federal law, here you go:

Image

Sleep tight my friends. :rolll :rolll
Beautiful, just beautiful.
American by birth Texan by the grace of God

Not to be a republican at twenty is proof of want of heart; to be one at thirty is proof of want of head.
-Francois Guisot
User avatar

sjfcontrol
Senior Member
Posts in topic: 1
Posts: 6267
Joined: Wed Oct 28, 2009 7:14 am
Location: Flint, TX

Re: Threat Question

#45

Post by sjfcontrol »

The only people that get upset over pictures of guns are school administrators. They also get upset about...

Finger guns
gun-shaped pizzas (and other foods)
stick-figures holding stick-guns
drawings of guns
kids going "Bang!"
kids who's parents have guns
Gun shaped jewlery and belt-buckles
toy guns (of all types)
NRA Magazines
Gun Magazines (both the paper and the metal types)

And much, much more!
Range Rule: "The front gate lock is not an acceptable target."
Never Forget. Image
Post Reply

Return to “LEO Contacts & Bloopers”