This week's LEO bloopers (March 14-20, 2010)

Most CHL/LEO contacts are positive, how about yours? Bloopers are fun, but no names please, if it will cause a LEO problems!

Moderators: carlson1, Keith B

User avatar

Topic author
seamusTX
Senior Member
Posts in topic: 12
Posts: 13551
Joined: Fri May 12, 2006 12:04 pm
Location: Galveston

Re: This week's LEO bloopers (March 14-20, 2010)

#31

Post by seamusTX »

srothstein wrote:Both of you caught one problem, the other problem is that there is no real disciplinary authority.
A police force is a paramilitary organization. There must be a single chain of command that sets standards and demands accountability for meeting them.

A person can be skeptical about law-enforcement authority (as I am) and still see that officers can't deal effectively with critical situations if they have to worry about an appointed board second-guessing them. I am equally skeptical of appointed boards having the power to ruin careers for their own idiosyncratic reasons.

I accept as a fact of life that the police are not going to be perfect. Most of the time the police hierarchy can deal with minor infractions, and the justice system can deal with criminal acts such as brutality, obstruction of justice, and bribery.

That was pretty much the point of starting this thread. Recall all these incidents happened in one week last year.

- Jim
Post Reply

Return to “LEO Contacts & Bloopers”