Stephenville PD Traffic Stop
-
Topic author - Senior Member
- Posts in topic: 5
- Posts: 3119
- Joined: Sat Mar 04, 2006 3:25 am
- Location: Stephenville TX
Stephenville PD Traffic Stop
I swung a bit wide on a turn last night near the time that some of the party crowds were wandering around, and got to see the local mobile Christmas light show.
Right hand on the wheel, left holding DL/CHL where the officer could see them, and interior lights on. He took the ID, asked for insurance, ran the plates, and told me to watch the corners. No questions about the CHL, and when he came back from checking the DL, (in the meantime, the plates and VIN came up "no record in database," which translates to "database is broken for the nine hundredth time today, but the state is too arrogant to admit that") he matched the VIN with the one on the insurance card and sent me on my way.
Sure enough, as I was pulling out, the dispatcher called him back to let him know that the third time she ran the plates they got a good return.
Two things to take away from this; scanners are nice to have, and I definitely agree with those who say LE should use a 10 code for CHL, rather than telling everybody else with a scanner that I carry.
Right hand on the wheel, left holding DL/CHL where the officer could see them, and interior lights on. He took the ID, asked for insurance, ran the plates, and told me to watch the corners. No questions about the CHL, and when he came back from checking the DL, (in the meantime, the plates and VIN came up "no record in database," which translates to "database is broken for the nine hundredth time today, but the state is too arrogant to admit that") he matched the VIN with the one on the insurance card and sent me on my way.
Sure enough, as I was pulling out, the dispatcher called him back to let him know that the third time she ran the plates they got a good return.
Two things to take away from this; scanners are nice to have, and I definitely agree with those who say LE should use a 10 code for CHL, rather than telling everybody else with a scanner that I carry.
-
- Senior Member
- Posts in topic: 1
- Posts: 5474
- Joined: Wed May 04, 2005 7:47 pm
- Location: Houston
Re: Stephenville PD Traffic Stop
I have never even thought of this. How interesting to listen on your stop.KD5NRH wrote:scanners are nice to have
I may have to do some gadget shopping.
-nick
Opportunity is missed by most people because it is dressed in overalls and looks like work. - Thomas Edison
-
- Senior Member
- Posts in topic: 1
- Posts: 4331
- Joined: Wed May 04, 2005 6:40 pm
- Location: DFW area
- Contact:
-
- Senior Member
- Posts in topic: 3
- Posts: 755
- Joined: Sun Mar 26, 2006 9:55 am
- Location: Rockwall, Texas
Re: Stephenville PD Traffic Stop
Since the Dispatcher got a return on the third try, its more likely than not that she had an error in her first two inquiries. Depending on her or the officers level of experience, lesser experienced officers often misread the letter "D" for an "O" or the number "0" for the letter "Q" or "I" for "1". Texas does not use O(cean) or I(da) as a license plate character to prevent such confusion. Personalized plates? Look closer at those with what looks like an "I" its really a "1", and the "O' is really a "0".KD5NRH wrote:, (in the meantime, the plates and VIN came up "no record in database," which translates to "database is broken for the nine hundredth time today, but the state is too arrogant to admit that") he matched the VIN with the one on the insurance card and sent me on my way.
Sure enough, as I was pulling out, the dispatcher called him back to let him know that the third time she ran the plates they got a good return.
Two things to take away from this; scanners are nice to have, and I definitely agree with those who say LE should use a 10 code for CHL, rather than telling everybody else with a scanner that I carry.
Running by the 17 digit VIN is difficult as well, unless the dispatcher has experience in recognizing a good VIN number. VINassist from NICB helps correctly identify which character should be what for a particular vehicle.
"Happiness is a warm gun" - The Beatles - 1969
Commander
Commander
-
- Junior Member
- Posts in topic: 1
- Posts: 35
- Joined: Tue Jul 11, 2006 10:28 am
- Location: Houston
- Contact:
Re: Stephenville PD Traffic Stop
Count on the probability that anyone who bothers to use a scanner is going to know the 10-codes anyhow.KD5NRH wrote: Two things to take away from this; scanners are nice to have, and I definitely agree with those who say LE should use a 10 code for CHL, rather than telling everybody else with a scanner that I carry.
Glad your experience was positive.
Not all who own musical instruments are musicians.
-
Topic author - Senior Member
- Posts in topic: 5
- Posts: 3119
- Joined: Sat Mar 04, 2006 3:25 am
- Location: Stephenville TX
Re: Stephenville PD Traffic Stop
She read it back correctly, and I was following along on the insurance card when she read the VIN back. No odd characters in that plate, (wife's car) and they've had the same problem with my ham plates in the past. (and I was listening to that check; they got the 5 right on the first try.)S&W6946 wrote:Since the Dispatcher got a return on the third try, its more likely than not that she had an error in her first two inquiries.
W0OOG's ham plates would beg to differ, (the Os are distinctly wider and rounder than the 0 on the plate) though I'd hate to be a cop trying to run his tag...or another operator trying to copy his call in Morse, for that matter. There's no 1 to compare to on K5IIY's plate, but the Is don't look like any license plate 1s I've ever seen.Personalized plates? Look closer at those with what looks like an "I" its really a "1", and the "O' is really a "0".
Of course, ham plates are an odd bird anyway, since the same one can be assigned to multiple cars as well. That's a great way to make a traffic stop last a while until they get it sorted out, since IIRC, the still don't have a way to handle that in the computer. It would be nice if the state would send some documentation along with the plates that could be handed to the officer.
Working security, I spend a lot of time listening to the scanner, and I've always been impressed with how fast our local dispatchers can copy a VIN, and catch an officer's error in reading it off.Running by the 17 digit VIN is difficult as well, unless the dispatcher has experience in recognizing a good VIN number.
-
- Senior Member
- Posts in topic: 3
- Posts: 755
- Joined: Sun Mar 26, 2006 9:55 am
- Location: Rockwall, Texas
Well, how about that...taught an ol' dog a new trick. Guess I've been in the supervisor's chair too long. Yes, sure enough the Ham plate does return Os and 0s. Have to modify what I said to exclude the Ham plates. The standard Texas LP does not use Os or Is.
"Happiness is a warm gun" - The Beatles - 1969
Commander
Commander
-
Topic author - Senior Member
- Posts in topic: 5
- Posts: 3119
- Joined: Sat Mar 04, 2006 3:25 am
- Location: Stephenville TX
Now look at what you have to go through to get a proper return on the second vehicle of a multiple-issue ham plate. (IIRC, the form allows up to four vehicles with the same plate.)S&W6946 wrote:Well, how about that...taught an ol' dog a new trick. Guess I've been in the supervisor's chair too long. Yes, sure enough the Ham plate does return Os and 0s. Have to modify what I said to exclude the Ham plates. The standard Texas LP does not use Os or Is.
Best I can recall, the other vehicles will still return on their previous tags, but the ham plate will show somewhere in the details that there are other vehicles besides the one listed.
-
- Senior Member
- Posts in topic: 1
- Posts: 837
- Joined: Thu Jun 01, 2006 12:18 pm
- Location: Fort Worth, Texas
Re: Stephenville PD Traffic Stop
If you'll notice at a "normal" tag, not a vanity tag, Texas does not have any vowels, No A's, E's, I's, O's and no U's.S&W6946 wrote: Since the Dispatcher got a return on the third try, its more likely than not that she had an error in her first two inquiries. Depending on her or the officers level of experience, lesser experienced officers often misread the letter "D" for an "O" or the number "0" for the letter "Q" or "I" for "1". Texas does not use O(cean) or I(da) as a license plate character to prevent such confusion. Personalized plates? Look closer at those with what looks like an "I" its really a "1", and the "O' is really a "0".
Running by the 17 digit VIN is difficult as well, unless the dispatcher has experience in recognizing a good VIN number. VINassist from NICB helps correctly identify which character should be what for a particular vehicle.
Russ
kw5kw
Retired DPS Communications Operator PCO III January 2014.
kw5kw
Retired DPS Communications Operator PCO III January 2014.
-
- Senior Member
- Posts in topic: 1
- Posts: 240
- Joined: Tue Dec 28, 2004 2:47 pm
- Location: Fort Worth, Texas
I was also in Stephenville Saturday, but didn't get stopped and don't have HAM plates on my truck, but this got me to thinking. A family of radio operators or maybe just the ol man with call plates on more than one vehicle and he is following his wife somewhere in separate vehicles and they do something questionable and the local LEO makes a double stop. :)
LEO: Hey, how come both these cars have the same LP ?
HAM: Well because ..................................................
LEO: Yeah right !
I can just picture it ! LOL
Bubba
KA5AMU
LEO: Hey, how come both these cars have the same LP ?
HAM: Well because ..................................................
LEO: Yeah right !
I can just picture it ! LOL
Bubba
KA5AMU
-
- Senior Member
- Posts in topic: 1
- Posts: 12329
- Joined: Sun Jun 12, 2005 3:31 pm
- Location: Angelina County
You always have something good to say. Dont stay gone so long next time.
Carry 24-7 or guess right.
CHL Instructor. http://www.pdtraining.us" onclick="window.open(this.href);return false;
NRA/TSRA Life Member - TFC Member #11
-
- Senior Member
- Posts in topic: 3
- Posts: 755
- Joined: Sun Mar 26, 2006 9:55 am
- Location: Rockwall, Texas
No law against it in Texas that I know of. It is illegal in some states, however, just as radar detectors are (in other states but not Texas - except (I think I'm correct on this) truck drivers)
If you're thinking about buying a scanner, you should get one that receives digital broadcasts - a lot of agencies either have or will be converting in the next few years from an analog signal (voice) to digital (voice is converted to data and transmitted). Digital scanners are much more expensive than the older analog scanners that you can buy for $100-$200.
If you're thinking about buying a scanner, you should get one that receives digital broadcasts - a lot of agencies either have or will be converting in the next few years from an analog signal (voice) to digital (voice is converted to data and transmitted). Digital scanners are much more expensive than the older analog scanners that you can buy for $100-$200.
"Happiness is a warm gun" - The Beatles - 1969
Commander
Commander
-
Topic author - Senior Member
- Posts in topic: 5
- Posts: 3119
- Joined: Sat Mar 04, 2006 3:25 am
- Location: Stephenville TX
Commercial vehicles in general, under Federal law. For private vehicles, there are a few problem states, but AFAIK, none of them are even close to here. In all cases, ham operators are exempt if the receiver i part of their mobile station gear, though I wouldn't push this one too far.S&W6946 wrote:No law against it in Texas that I know of. It is illegal in some states, however, just as radar detectors are (in other states but not Texas - except (I think I'm correct on this) truck drivers)
Y'know, I've worn out three analog scanners since people started saying that. Small town agencies aren't in any hurry to waste the money, and bigger agencies don't do anything quickly.If you're thinking about buying a scanner, you should get one that receives digital broadcasts - a lot of agencies either have or will be converting in the next few years from an analog signal (voice) to digital