The focal point for Texas firearms information and discussions
http://texaschlforum.com/
TreyHouston wrote:I don't have much opinion on bills because they are very long and complicated! but here are some thoughts:
"HB111 (Moody) Relating to an educational program and fee reductions to improve firearm safety.
Impact: This Bill would reduce the fee for a LTC for an applicant that bought a “secure storage device” by an amount equal to the cost of the device, or $40, whichever is lesser. The Bill would also require DPS to create a gun safety program, including a pamphlet promoting the program
Position on Bill: Oppose.
Status: Filed 11/14/16.
Comments: While this is a “feel good bill,” it accomplishes nothing. There is a stand along bill to repeal all LTC fees, so this bill would be in conflict. The best gun safety courses in existence are those created by the NRA, including but not limited to the NRA Eddie Eagle Program and Home Firearm Safety Program. A better way to promote gun safety is to require all public school students be provided both of these programs in school at no cost to the school."
as read on:
https://www.texasfirearmscoalition.com/ ... ve-session
I agree. why not reduce LTC fees 50% across the board for the various classes of license applicants.Jusme wrote: Why not an across the board reduction that actually saves people money?
SB16 will do away with the fee entirely, unless the bill has been amended prior to filing. The Lt. Gov. really wants this done!BeanCounter wrote:I agree. why not reduce LTC fees 50% across the board for the various classes of license applicants.Jusme wrote: Why not an across the board reduction that actually saves people money?
If THEY want to promote “secure storage devices" why not allow a sales tax exemption for gun safes, etc?
I understand your point, but we are dealing with a constitutional right. If the Legislature feels that the licensing law should exist for public safety reasons, then the cost should be born by the general public. The cost of voter registration is born by the public and voting is also a constitutional right.rotor wrote:If you eliminate the fee then tax dollars from other programs have to pay for the processing of the LTC. I am not going to argue whether LTC should be eliminated but the person applying for one should be at a minimum paying for it.
Charles L. Cotton wrote:SB16 will do away with the fee entirely, unless the bill has been amended prior to filing. The Lt. Gov. really wants this done!BeanCounter wrote:I agree. why not reduce LTC fees 50% across the board for the various classes of license applicants.Jusme wrote: Why not an across the board reduction that actually saves people money?
If THEY want to promote “secure storage devices" why not allow a sales tax exemption for gun safes, etc?
Chas.
HB111 will be a discount only if you buy a storage device. SB16 repeals the fee, but the bill is not yet available on the Leg. website.Jusme wrote:Charles L. Cotton wrote:SB16 will do away with the fee entirely, unless the bill has been amended prior to filing. The Lt. Gov. really wants this done!BeanCounter wrote:I agree. why not reduce LTC fees 50% across the board for the various classes of license applicants.Jusme wrote: Why not an across the board reduction that actually saves people money?
If THEY want to promote “secure storage devices" why not allow a sales tax exemption for gun safes, etc?
Chas.
Sorry I only read part of the,way through it.
I understood the reduction to be continent upon purchasing a storage unit for the gun. I need to slow down a little bit.
There's no legal or constitutional requirement that the LTC program be self-supporting. That has been the Legislature's requirement since 1993 (HB1776). It's still going to be a hard sell since the fiscal note on the Bill is going to be a shocker. Nevertheless, it's the right thing to do.SewTexas wrote:I thought that something said that the ltc's had to support the department? if that's the case then it can't be fee free? this doesn't make sense...understand, I'll go for anything that means I'm not giving the govn't more of my $. I'm just not understanding how this can't work withing what I understand the law to be.
ah, got it. thanks for the clarification.Charles L. Cotton wrote:There's no legal or constitutional requirement that the LTC program be self-supporting. That has been the Legislature's requirement since 1993 (HB1776). It's still going to be a hard sell since the fiscal note on the Bill is going to be a shocker. Nevertheless, it's the right thing to do.SewTexas wrote:I thought that something said that the ltc's had to support the department? if that's the case then it can't be fee free? this doesn't make sense...understand, I'll go for anything that means I'm not giving the govn't more of my $. I'm just not understanding how this can't work withing what I understand the law to be.
Chas.