HB 910 Conference Committee

Moderators: carlson1, Charles L. Cotton

Locked
User avatar

The Annoyed Man
Senior Member
Posts in topic: 8
Posts: 26850
Joined: Wed Jan 16, 2008 12:59 pm
Location: North Richland Hills, Texas
Contact:

Re: HB 910 Conference Committee

#151

Post by The Annoyed Man »

Stripes Dude wrote:
LSUTiger wrote:Will HB910 pass?

http://www.ask8ball.net/" onclick="window.open(this.href);return false;

I got 2 most likely's, 1 ask again later and 1 outlook good.
That is significantly more credible than any source I've seen yet!!!
I got a "doubtful" the first time, a "Reply hazy, try again" the 2nd time, and a "most likely" the third time. I don't trust that guy. :mrgreen:
“Hard times create strong men. Strong men create good times. Good times create weak men. And, weak men create hard times.”

― G. Michael Hopf, "Those Who Remain"

#TINVOWOOT

juno106
Member
Posts in topic: 9
Posts: 96
Joined: Sat Jan 24, 2015 10:59 pm

Re: HB 910 Conference Committee

#152

Post by juno106 »

...or

Huffman could have left in the Dutton amendment, there would have been no need for the Huffines amendment, and HB910 would have gone straight to the Gov instead of House concurrence.

Hate seeing Huffines being blamed for Huffman's blunder...


The Annoyed Man wrote:
Callaway wrote:Not sure if credible...

Chuck Lindell ‏@chucklindell 2m2 minutes ago
Sen. @DonHuffines says he is disappointed his police-stop amendment got cut but, "I'm going to go along with the will of the body." #txlege
The feckless idiot could have gone along with the will of the body and pulled his amendment down while Huffman was cleaning his plow.......but he didn't. All of this lays squarely at his feet.
Last edited by juno106 on Thu May 28, 2015 5:20 pm, edited 1 time in total.
User avatar

jmra
Senior Member
Posts in topic: 14
Posts: 10371
Joined: Tue Feb 03, 2009 6:51 am
Location: Ellis County

Re: HB 910 Conference Committee

#153

Post by jmra »

juno106 wrote:...or

Huffman could have left in the Dutton amendment, there would have been no need for the Huffines amendment, and HB910 would have gone straight to the Gov instead of House concurrence.

Hate seeing Huffines being blamed for Huffman's blunder...
And it may have well suffered the same fate it did in the house.
Life is tough, but it's tougher when you're stupid.
John Wayne
NRA Lifetime member
User avatar

mojo84
Senior Member
Posts in topic: 16
Posts: 9043
Joined: Tue Jun 21, 2011 4:07 pm
Location: Boerne, TX (Kendall County)

Re: HB 910 Conference Committee

#154

Post by mojo84 »

DMN Politics ‏@DMNPolitics 2m2 minutes ago
Open carry's passage seems likely, after key lawmakers strip amendment opposed by police | @tombenning http://share.d-news.co/OHY1TUS" onclick="window.open(this.href);return false; #txlege
Note: Me sharing a link and information published by others does not constitute my endorsement, agreement, disagreement, my opinion or publishing by me. If you do not like what is contained at a link I share, take it up with the author or publisher of the content.

juno106
Member
Posts in topic: 9
Posts: 96
Joined: Sat Jan 24, 2015 10:59 pm

Re: HB 910 Conference Committee

#155

Post by juno106 »

it WOULDN'T have gone to the House ! it WOULD have gone to the Governor.

So, your point is?
jmra wrote:
juno106 wrote:...or

Huffman could have left in the Dutton amendment, there would have been no need for the Huffines amendment, and HB910 would have gone straight to the Gov instead of House concurrence.

Hate seeing Huffines being blamed for Huffman's blunder...
And it may have well suffered the same fate it did in the house.

Tracker
Senior Member
Posts in topic: 10
Posts: 520
Joined: Sat Jun 01, 2013 10:51 am

Re: HB 910 Conference Committee

#156

Post by Tracker »

juno106 wrote:...or

Huffman could have left in the Dutton amendment, there would have been no need for the Huffines amendment, and HB910 would have gone straight to the Gov instead of House concurrence.

Hate seeing Huffines being blamed for Huffman's blunder...
Huffman couldn't remove Dutton on her own. hmm :drool: since were into speculating I wonder if Huffines voted to remove Dutton :leaving
User avatar

jmra
Senior Member
Posts in topic: 14
Posts: 10371
Joined: Tue Feb 03, 2009 6:51 am
Location: Ellis County

Re: HB 910 Conference Committee

#157

Post by jmra »

mojo84 wrote:
DMN Politics ‏@DMNPolitics 2m2 minutes ago
Open carry's passage seems likely, after key lawmakers strip amendment opposed by police | @tombenning http://share.d-news.co/OHY1TUS" onclick="window.open(this.href);return false; #txlege
Man this has been a roller coaster ride!
Life is tough, but it's tougher when you're stupid.
John Wayne
NRA Lifetime member
User avatar

mojo84
Senior Member
Posts in topic: 16
Posts: 9043
Joined: Tue Jun 21, 2011 4:07 pm
Location: Boerne, TX (Kendall County)

Re: HB 910 Conference Committee

#158

Post by mojo84 »

jmra wrote:
mojo84 wrote:
DMN Politics ‏@DMNPolitics 2m2 minutes ago
Open carry's passage seems likely, after key lawmakers strip amendment opposed by police | @tombenning http://share.d-news.co/OHY1TUS" onclick="window.open(this.href);return false; #txlege
Man this has been a roller coaster ride!

Yes sir, it sure has. I'm pretty much numb about it now. Won't get too up or down until the session ends or the Governor signs it.
Note: Me sharing a link and information published by others does not constitute my endorsement, agreement, disagreement, my opinion or publishing by me. If you do not like what is contained at a link I share, take it up with the author or publisher of the content.
User avatar

jmra
Senior Member
Posts in topic: 14
Posts: 10371
Joined: Tue Feb 03, 2009 6:51 am
Location: Ellis County

Re: HB 910 Conference Committee

#159

Post by jmra »

mojo84 wrote:
jmra wrote:
mojo84 wrote:
DMN Politics ‏@DMNPolitics 2m2 minutes ago
Open carry's passage seems likely, after key lawmakers strip amendment opposed by police | @tombenning http://share.d-news.co/OHY1TUS" onclick="window.open(this.href);return false; #txlege
Man this has been a roller coaster ride!

Yes sir, it sure has. I'm pretty much numb about it now. Won't get too up or down until the session ends or the Governor signs it.
:iagree:
Life is tough, but it's tougher when you're stupid.
John Wayne
NRA Lifetime member

Ruark
Senior Member
Posts in topic: 12
Posts: 1805
Joined: Tue Nov 22, 2011 8:11 pm

Re: HB 910 Conference Committee

#160

Post by Ruark »

If I'm understanding it correctly, it's dead meat. It will never survive the filibusters. Tell me I'm wrong.
-Ruark
User avatar

NorthTexas
Member
Posts in topic: 5
Posts: 120
Joined: Fri Jan 21, 2011 7:30 pm

Re: HB 910 Conference Committee

#161

Post by NorthTexas »

juno106 wrote:...or

Huffman could have left in the Dutton amendment, there would have been no need for the Huffines amendment, and HB910 would have gone straight to the Gov instead of House concurrence.

Hate seeing Huffines being blamed for Huffman's blunder...

Charles has suggested multiple times that Huffman stripped the Dutton amendment in committee because, due to LEO opposition that materialized after the House vote, there would be strong opposition to open carry with the Dutton amendment in the Senate and it might not get enough votes. Also, while it has not been stated directly, it has been suggested that the "deal" reached between Straus and Patrick called for passing HB 910 in the Senate, without the Dutton amendment, so that it could go to a conference committee, where the House would concur (since they were now aware of the LEO concerns). Huffines interfered with this in an attempt to burnish his political credentials for a future Congressional run.
NRA Life Member
User avatar

jmra
Senior Member
Posts in topic: 14
Posts: 10371
Joined: Tue Feb 03, 2009 6:51 am
Location: Ellis County

Re: HB 910 Conference Committee

#162

Post by jmra »

Ruark wrote:If I'm understanding it correctly, it's dead meat. It will never survive the filibusters. Tell me I'm wrong.
This session has been very unpredictable
Life is tough, but it's tougher when you're stupid.
John Wayne
NRA Lifetime member
User avatar

NorthTexas
Member
Posts in topic: 5
Posts: 120
Joined: Fri Jan 21, 2011 7:30 pm

Re: HB 910 Conference Committee

#163

Post by NorthTexas »

Ruark wrote:If I'm understanding it correctly, it's dead meat. It will never survive the filibusters. Tell me I'm wrong.
It ain't over till it's over. I'm impressed with the progress today (in stark contrast to the rest of the session) - they do seem determined to get something passed, now that we're down to the wire. It could be voted on tomorrow. We'll have to see...
NRA Life Member

shootnfish
Junior Member
Posts in topic: 1
Posts: 8
Joined: Fri Aug 06, 2010 3:10 pm

Re: HB 910 Conference Committee

#164

Post by shootnfish »

Ruark wrote:If I'm understanding it correctly, it's dead meat. It will never survive the filibusters. Tell me I'm wrong.
It depends on how soon it comes up for a vote. In the Senate, with the current rules, long filibusters are very difficult. There is no eating, drinking, going to the bathroom, sitting or even leaning on anything for the duration.

viking1000
Senior Member
Posts in topic: 9
Posts: 222
Joined: Thu Mar 05, 2015 5:04 pm
Location: Texas Hill Country

Re: HB 910 Conference Committee

#165

Post by viking1000 »

Will be interesting to see the committee vote was.
Locked

Return to “2015 Legislative Session”