I think that this would have to apply to OC as well, if it passes, since there will only be one version of 46.035 when it's all said and done, and SB17 just adds an exception that the intentional display does not apply if the person is a license holder, with weapon in belt or shoulder holder.
CHL Holder since 10/08
NRA Certified Instructor
Former LTC Instructor
Charles,
Have you changed your opinion about this bill being DOA?
Note: Me sharing a link and information published by others does not constitute my endorsement, agreement, disagreement, my opinion or publishing by me. If you do not like what is contained at a link I share, take it up with the author or publisher of the content.
Based on what I read in another post in the forum, the 24th is also the date that the Homeland Security & Public Safety committee should be voting on OC and campus carry since it will be the first meeting after taking testimony on those two issues. Here's hoping it is a good day for all three bills (i.e., OC, campus carry, and HB308).
Anyone watch the committee hearing today? Was this bill brought up?
NRA EPL pending life member
"The Constitution is not an instrument for the government to restrain the people; it is an instrument for the people to restrain the government"- Patrick Henry
"The Constitution is not an instrument for the government to restrain the people; it is an instrument for the people to restrain the government"- Patrick Henry
booze97 wrote:Ugh, all this attention on Open Carry while THE MOST IMPORTANT firearms bill filed goes nowhere.
End statutory Victim Zones!!!
As has been said said on here before, if there is support for a bill, there is plenty of time and it will get its due attention. (Not necessarily my words or opinion)
Note: Me sharing a link and information published by others does not constitute my endorsement, agreement, disagreement, my opinion or publishing by me. If you do not like what is contained at a link I share, take it up with the author or publisher of the content.