HB 910 (OC) Committee debate - Now
Moderators: carlson1, Charles L. Cotton
Re: HB 910 (OC) Committee debate - Now
Surprised how strongly Representative Nevarez pushed back on the witness who claimed (referencing this article) that Campus Carry will take 40 gazillion dollars away from cancer research. While he's obviously still going to vote against, I have some newfound respect for him.
-
- Senior Member
- Posts in topic: 8
- Posts: 1201
- Joined: Thu Apr 03, 2014 12:17 pm
- Location: Austin
Re: HB 910 (OC) Committee debate - Now
This firearm instructor wants to bring back the class for renewals. His business must be hurting from when the requirement was removed.
Keep calm and carry.
Licensing (n.) - When government takes away your right to do something and sells it back to you.
Licensing (n.) - When government takes away your right to do something and sells it back to you.
-
Topic author - Senior Member
- Posts in topic: 37
- Posts: 1088
- Joined: Thu Jun 12, 2014 8:47 am
- Location: DFW
Re: HB 910 (OC) Committee debate - Now
Are you sure that was Navarez? I didn't think he was in the room at the time.v7a wrote:Surprised how strongly Representative Nevarez pushed back on the witness who claimed (referencing this article) that Campus Carry will take 40 gazillion dollars away from cancer research. While he's obviously still going to vote against, I have some newfound respect for him.
-
Topic author - Senior Member
- Posts in topic: 37
- Posts: 1088
- Joined: Thu Jun 12, 2014 8:47 am
- Location: DFW
Re: HB 910 (OC) Committee debate - Now
I thought the same thing.mr1337 wrote:This firearm instructor wants to bring back the class for renewals. His business must be hurting from when the requirement was removed.
Re: HB 910 (OC) Committee debate - Now
Did anyone catch his name? Let's leave his business some yelp reviews so that potential customers know how deep his support for the 2nd Amendment runs.mr1337 wrote:This firearm instructor wants to bring back the class for renewals. His business must be hurting from when the requirement was removed.
-
- Senior Member
- Posts in topic: 14
- Posts: 9316
- Joined: Fri May 22, 2009 7:13 pm
- Location: Arlington
Re: HB 910 (OC) Committee debate - Now
Anyone getting the feeling that the committee chairman is leaning in favor of this bill, while trying to be objective?
Diplomacy is the Art of Letting Someone Have Your Way
TSRA
Colt Gov't Model .380
TSRA
Colt Gov't Model .380
-
- Senior Member
- Posts in topic: 8
- Posts: 1201
- Joined: Thu Apr 03, 2014 12:17 pm
- Location: Austin
Re: HB 910 (OC) Committee debate - Now
This chick: I was in an abusive relationship and a gun wouldn't have helped me, so therefore, no one should be able to defend themselves with a gun on campus.
Keep calm and carry.
Licensing (n.) - When government takes away your right to do something and sells it back to you.
Licensing (n.) - When government takes away your right to do something and sells it back to you.
-
- Senior Member
- Posts in topic: 6
- Posts: 1335
- Joined: Mon Jan 05, 2015 1:17 pm
Re: HB 910 (OC) Committee debate - Now
There was a UT student organization spokesperson testifying against the gun bills, and I have to say she brought out a couple of great points. Great points. Genius.
Reading between the lines, I can tell she believes in the power of law. Make it illegal and abusive behavior stops. Yessum, I understand.
Her more overt point was outstanding. She spoke of how drunkenness and substance abuse denies our college youths the proper use of their minds. They can't think. They're too drunk.
Clearly we must adjust the drinking age upward. All we have to do is pass a law. You have to be 26, or 30, or Kenyan, or something to be President, why not bring the drinking age into alignment? All we have to do to save college kids is take away their beer.
Driving, too. Cars are dangerous and if you're sotted, you can't drive. Bump the driving age, take the sipper cups of beer from the kiddies, and let's save some lives.
She also said something about open carry and campus carry proposals, but none of that made much sense.
Reading between the lines, I can tell she believes in the power of law. Make it illegal and abusive behavior stops. Yessum, I understand.
Her more overt point was outstanding. She spoke of how drunkenness and substance abuse denies our college youths the proper use of their minds. They can't think. They're too drunk.
Clearly we must adjust the drinking age upward. All we have to do is pass a law. You have to be 26, or 30, or Kenyan, or something to be President, why not bring the drinking age into alignment? All we have to do to save college kids is take away their beer.
Driving, too. Cars are dangerous and if you're sotted, you can't drive. Bump the driving age, take the sipper cups of beer from the kiddies, and let's save some lives.
She also said something about open carry and campus carry proposals, but none of that made much sense.
-
Topic author - Senior Member
- Posts in topic: 37
- Posts: 1088
- Joined: Thu Jun 12, 2014 8:47 am
- Location: DFW
Re: HB 910 (OC) Committee debate - Now
He's an author of the bill.joe817 wrote:Anyone getting the feeling that the committee chairman is leaning in favor of this bill, while trying to be objective?
Re: HB 910 (OC) Committee debate - Now
Not sure from the video, but I thought it was his voice. I might be mistaken though.TVGuy wrote:Are you sure that was Navarez? I didn't think he was in the room at the time.v7a wrote:Surprised how strongly Representative Nevarez pushed back on the witness who claimed (referencing this article) that Campus Carry will take 40 gazillion dollars away from cancer research. While he's obviously still going to vote against, I have some newfound respect for him.
-
- Senior Member
- Posts in topic: 7
- Posts: 243
- Joined: Fri Feb 06, 2009 12:03 am
Re: HB 910 (OC) Committee debate - Now
The camera angle was much better in the Senate Committee. Made it much easier to see who was speaking and facial expressions, etc.
-
Topic author - Senior Member
- Posts in topic: 37
- Posts: 1088
- Joined: Thu Jun 12, 2014 8:47 am
- Location: DFW
Re: HB 910 (OC) Committee debate - Now
Very true, can't see any of the faces of those testifying.joelamosobadiah wrote:The camera angle was much better in the Senate Committee. Made it much easier to see who was speaking and facial expressions, etc.
-
- Senior Member
- Posts in topic: 14
- Posts: 9316
- Joined: Fri May 22, 2009 7:13 pm
- Location: Arlington
Re: HB 910 (OC) Committee debate - Now
Obviously, I don't follow this committee very closely. Thanks.TVGuy wrote:He's an author of the bill.joe817 wrote:Anyone getting the feeling that the committee chairman is leaning in favor of this bill, while trying to be objective?
Diplomacy is the Art of Letting Someone Have Your Way
TSRA
Colt Gov't Model .380
TSRA
Colt Gov't Model .380
Re: HB 910 (OC) Committee debate - Now
It was Nevarez if you're talking about the testimony mentioning MD Anderson's cost of $20 m for gun safes. Please correct me but doesn't the existing laws prohibit CHL carry in a hospital? So, what's logical about a hospital buying gun safes?v7a wrote:Not sure from the video, but I thought it was his voice. I might be mistaken though.TVGuy wrote:Are you sure that was Navarez? I didn't think he was in the room at the time.v7a wrote:Surprised how strongly Representative Nevarez pushed back on the witness who claimed (referencing this article) that Campus Carry will take 40 gazillion dollars away from cancer research. While he's obviously still going to vote against, I have some newfound respect for him.
Life is good.
Re: HB 910 (OC) Committee debate - Now
Only if they post 30.06, or are an institution of higher education.K5GU wrote:It was Nevarez if you're talking about the testimony mentioning MD Anderson's cost of $20 m for gun safes. Please correct me but doesn't the existing laws prohibit CHL carry in a hospital? So, what's logical about a hospital buying gun safes?v7a wrote:Not sure from the video, but I thought it was his voice. I might be mistaken though.TVGuy wrote:Are you sure that was Navarez? I didn't think he was in the room at the time.v7a wrote:Surprised how strongly Representative Nevarez pushed back on the witness who claimed (referencing this article) that Campus Carry will take 40 gazillion dollars away from cancer research. While he's obviously still going to vote against, I have some newfound respect for him.