Link to Today's TX Senate Hearing On SB11 and SB 17 (2-12)

Moderators: carlson1, Charles L. Cotton

User avatar

mojo84
Senior Member
Posts in topic: 30
Posts: 9043
Joined: Tue Jun 21, 2011 4:07 pm
Location: Boerne, TX (Kendall County)

Re: Link to Today's TX Senate Hearing On SB11 and SB 17 (2-1

#211

Post by mojo84 »

The Annoyed Man wrote:
ScooterSissy wrote:Both bills passed committee, both by a 7-2 vote.
Didn't SB11 pass with an amendment from Zefferini?

And Chief Acevido was a real piece of work. He told so many lies it got hard to pick out the truths from what he said. Maybe there were none?

I believe Huffman added an amendment to the open carry bill that requires the gun to be concealed on college campuses.

Zaffarini, which is a Straus buddy, said she has 12 amendments but she'll add them later, I guess on the floor.
Note: Me sharing a link and information published by others does not constitute my endorsement, agreement, disagreement, my opinion or publishing by me. If you do not like what is contained at a link I share, take it up with the author or publisher of the content.

louisf1
Member
Posts in topic: 1
Posts: 83
Joined: Wed Jan 16, 2013 4:32 pm

Re: Link to Today's TX Senate Hearing On SB11 and SB 17 (2-1

#212

Post by louisf1 »

SewTexas wrote:
The Annoyed Man wrote:
ScooterSissy wrote:Both bills passed committee, both by a 7-2 vote.
Didn't SB11 pass with an amendment from Zefferini?

And Chief Acevido was a real piece of work. He told so many lies it got hard to pick out the truths from what he said. Maybe there were none?

someone said earlier that they didn't wait for her amendments.

and I'm also a little confused, Dan Patrick sent out a message that the bills passed with a 7-0 vote.
Passed out of committee 7-0 repubs votes are what he is referring to. Now I have a question? Can any senator add amendments or must they be voted on to accept the amendment. I mean a bill could be amended to resemble nothing like it started.

Bladed
Senior Member
Posts in topic: 2
Posts: 421
Joined: Thu Apr 25, 2013 7:28 pm

Re: Link to Today's TX Senate Hearing On SB11 and SB 17 (2-1

#213

Post by Bladed »

louisf1 wrote:
SewTexas wrote:
The Annoyed Man wrote:
ScooterSissy wrote:Both bills passed committee, both by a 7-2 vote.
Didn't SB11 pass with an amendment from Zefferini?

And Chief Acevido was a real piece of work. He told so many lies it got hard to pick out the truths from what he said. Maybe there were none?

someone said earlier that they didn't wait for her amendments.

and I'm also a little confused, Dan Patrick sent out a message that the bills passed with a 7-0 vote.
Passed out of committee 7-0 repubs votes are what he is referring to. Now I have a question? Can any senator add amendments or must they be voted on to accept the amendment. I mean a bill could be amended to resemble nothing like it started.
I think you just answered your own question.
User avatar

ELB
Senior Member
Posts in topic: 10
Posts: 8128
Joined: Tue May 22, 2007 9:34 pm
Location: Seguin

Re: Link to Today's TX Senate Hearing On SB11 and SB 17 (2-1

#214

Post by ELB »

locke_n_load wrote: I sure hope that the retention holster amendment flops, as well as the visual identification, and the holster placement requirements.
If having a holster, and holster retention, are such important safety issues, then I am sure any serious amendment will also require non-uniformed police officers to either fully conceal their handguns, or meet the same safety standards as licensed OC'ers. Two-level or three-level for everyone?

Right?
USAF 1982-2005
____________
User avatar

mojo84
Senior Member
Posts in topic: 30
Posts: 9043
Joined: Tue Jun 21, 2011 4:07 pm
Location: Boerne, TX (Kendall County)

Re: Link to Today's TX Senate Hearing On SB11 and SB 17 (2-1

#215

Post by mojo84 »

Sure would be bummer if they required a chl badge for exposed identification after all the jokes we've made about them and tiaras. :lol:
Last edited by mojo84 on Fri Feb 13, 2015 12:44 am, edited 1 time in total.
Note: Me sharing a link and information published by others does not constitute my endorsement, agreement, disagreement, my opinion or publishing by me. If you do not like what is contained at a link I share, take it up with the author or publisher of the content.

Rrash
Senior Member
Posts in topic: 4
Posts: 483
Joined: Fri May 25, 2012 1:25 am
Location: McKinney

Re: Link to Today's TX Senate Hearing On SB11 and SB 17 (2-1

#216

Post by Rrash »

mojo84 wrote:Should would be bummer if they required a chl badge for exposed identification after all the jokes we've made about them and tiaras. :lol:
Please don't give them ideas.
User avatar

mojo84
Senior Member
Posts in topic: 30
Posts: 9043
Joined: Tue Jun 21, 2011 4:07 pm
Location: Boerne, TX (Kendall County)

Re: Link to Today's TX Senate Hearing On SB11 and SB 17 (2-1

#217

Post by mojo84 »

Rrash wrote:
mojo84 wrote:Should would be bummer if they required a chl badge for exposed identification after all the jokes we've made about them and tiaras. :lol:
Please don't give them ideas.

Too late. Zaffarini already has an amendment to attach to the open carry bill that will require external identification if it gets included. ;-)
Last edited by mojo84 on Fri Feb 13, 2015 12:50 am, edited 1 time in total.
Note: Me sharing a link and information published by others does not constitute my endorsement, agreement, disagreement, my opinion or publishing by me. If you do not like what is contained at a link I share, take it up with the author or publisher of the content.
User avatar

Beiruty
Senior Member
Posts in topic: 2
Posts: 9655
Joined: Tue Aug 12, 2008 9:22 pm
Location: Allen, Texas

Re: Link to Today's TX Senate Hearing On SB11 and SB 17 (2-1

#218

Post by Beiruty »

I want a Police like Shield! "rlol"
Seriously, that would silence a lot of antis.
Beiruty,
United we stand, dispersed we falter
2014: NRA Endowment lifetime member
User avatar

Beiruty
Senior Member
Posts in topic: 2
Posts: 9655
Joined: Tue Aug 12, 2008 9:22 pm
Location: Allen, Texas

Re: Link to Today's TX Senate Hearing On SB11 and SB 17 (2-1

#219

Post by Beiruty »

mojo84 wrote:
The Annoyed Man wrote:
ScooterSissy wrote:Both bills passed committee, both by a 7-2 vote.
Didn't SB11 pass with an amendment from Zefferini?

And Chief Acevido was a real piece of work. He told so many lies it got hard to pick out the truths from what he said. Maybe there were none?

I believe Huffman added an amendment to the open carry bill that requires the gun to be concealed on college campuses.

Zaffarini, which is a Straus buddy, said she has 12 amendments but she'll add them later, I guess on the floor.
On the floor, amendment can be voted to be in or out.
Beiruty,
United we stand, dispersed we falter
2014: NRA Endowment lifetime member

Rrash
Senior Member
Posts in topic: 4
Posts: 483
Joined: Fri May 25, 2012 1:25 am
Location: McKinney

Re: Link to Today's TX Senate Hearing On SB11 and SB 17 (2-1

#220

Post by Rrash »

Beiruty wrote:On the floor, amendment can be voted to be in or out.
My next question to the forum was going to be this.

Right2Carry
Banned
Posts in topic: 1
Posts: 1447
Joined: Fri Dec 01, 2006 2:29 pm
Location: Dallas/Fort Worth Area

Re: Link to Today's TX Senate Hearing On SB11 and SB 17 (2-1

#221

Post by Right2Carry »

mojo84 wrote:
Rrash wrote:
mojo84 wrote:Should would be bummer if they required a chl badge for exposed identification after all the jokes we've made about them and tiaras. :lol:
Please don't give them ideas.

Too late. Zaffarini already has an amendment to attach to the open carry bill that will require external identification if it gets included. ;-)
This would be akin to businesses having to post big ole 30.06 signs! Ugh! I wonder if this would be a DPS issued badge that you received once you had your license? I mean what good would it be if anyone could buy one? Seems if they weren't controlled the bad guys could use them as well. Just a horrible idea IMHO!
“Some people spend an entire lifetime wondering if they made a difference in the world. But, an American Soldier doesn't have that problem". — President Ronald Reagan, 1985
User avatar

OldCannon
Senior Member
Posts in topic: 3
Posts: 3058
Joined: Sun Jan 17, 2010 11:19 am
Location: Converse, TX

Re: Link to Today's TX Senate Hearing On SB11 and SB 17 (2-1

#222

Post by OldCannon »

Can somebody please post a link to Acevedo's testimony (transcript or video). I'm hearing that he made some outrageous claims related to rape at the session. Interestingly, this wouldn't be the first time that Acevedo has shown callous disregard for victims of rape. He values the victim culture, like most liberals.
I don't fear guns; I fear voters and politicians that fear guns.
User avatar

mojo84
Senior Member
Posts in topic: 30
Posts: 9043
Joined: Tue Jun 21, 2011 4:07 pm
Location: Boerne, TX (Kendall County)

Re: Link to Today's TX Senate Hearing On SB11 and SB 17 (2-1

#223

Post by mojo84 »

You should be able to access the archive video here once they load it. It doesn't appear to be available yet. http://www.senate.state.tx.us/avarchive/?yr=2015&mo=02" onclick="window.open(this.href);return false;

Acevedo's testimony was about as irrational and lacking in logic as any I heard from any of the nutjobs yesterday.

I think a good sign for us is Texas Tech's chancellor. It appeared he almost conceded campus carry would become law and he was there to tried to influence some aspects of it. He also acknowledged there are already guns on campuses.
Last edited by mojo84 on Fri Feb 13, 2015 10:06 am, edited 1 time in total.
Note: Me sharing a link and information published by others does not constitute my endorsement, agreement, disagreement, my opinion or publishing by me. If you do not like what is contained at a link I share, take it up with the author or publisher of the content.
User avatar

The Annoyed Man
Senior Member
Posts in topic: 4
Posts: 26851
Joined: Wed Jan 16, 2008 12:59 pm
Location: North Richland Hills, Texas
Contact:

Re: Link to Today's TX Senate Hearing On SB11 and SB 17 (2-1

#224

Post by The Annoyed Man »

OldCannon wrote:Can somebody please post a link to Acevedo's testimony (transcript or video). I'm hearing that he made some outrageous claims related to rape at the session. Interestingly, this wouldn't be the first time that Acevedo has shown callous disregard for victims of rape. He values the victim culture, like most liberals.
He got called on the rape thing by others giving testimony. Basically, what he said was that he would rather that young women who have been assaulted take advantage of rape survivor resources after the fact, than to have to either face a homicide charge themselves, or have their gun taken from them and murdered with it. The problem is that he flatly rules out the possibility that a sexual assault victim might be able to A) shoot her assailant without having her gun taken, and B) do so without being prosecuted for it.

He was infuriating. Somebody said that his testimony was akin to the advice of some anti-gun types, that sexual assault victims should urinate on themselves to make themselves less attractive to the rapist. He tried to weasel out of that line of thought, but he continued to insist that a rape victim was better off taking advantage of rape-survivor resources than defending herself with a gun. The subtextual misogyny of the left is astounding in the face of their claim to the high ground in women's rights. It was as disgusting a display of chauvinism as I've seen in years. I have NEVER met a conservative or libertarian who thought that women should just lie back and take it, and then learn how to cope with the psychological impact of that afterward. That is just plain evil thinking.

Women who submit to this ideal agree to live as second class citizens.
“Hard times create strong men. Strong men create good times. Good times create weak men. And, weak men create hard times.”

― G. Michael Hopf, "Those Who Remain"

#TINVOWOOT
User avatar

jmra
Senior Member
Posts in topic: 1
Posts: 10371
Joined: Tue Feb 03, 2009 6:51 am
Location: Ellis County

Re: Link to Today's TX Senate Hearing On SB11 and SB 17 (2-1

#225

Post by jmra »

The Annoyed Man wrote:
OldCannon wrote:Can somebody please post a link to Acevedo's testimony (transcript or video). I'm hearing that he made some outrageous claims related to rape at the session. Interestingly, this wouldn't be the first time that Acevedo has shown callous disregard for victims of rape. He values the victim culture, like most liberals.
He got called on the rape thing by others giving testimony. Basically, what he said was that he would rather that young women who have been assaulted take advantage of rape survivor resources after the fact, than to have to either face a homicide charge themselves, or have their gun taken from them and murdered with it. The problem is that he flatly rules out the possibility that a sexual assault victim might be able to A) shoot her assailant without having her gun taken, and B) do so without being prosecuted for it.

He was infuriating. Somebody said that his testimony was akin to the advice of some anti-gun types, that sexual assault victims should urinate on themselves to make themselves less attractive to the rapist. He tried to weasel out of that line of thought, but he continued to insist that a rape victim was better off taking advantage of rape-survivor resources than defending herself with a gun. The subtextual misogyny of the left is astounding in the face of their claim to the high ground in women's rights. It was as disgusting a display of chauvinism as I've seen in years. I have NEVER met a conservative or libertarian who thought that women should just lie back and take it, and then learn how to cope with the psychological impact of that afterward. That is just plain evil thinking.

Women who submit to this ideal agree to live as second class citizens.
I wonder if he would prefer to be armed or unarmed if Bubba was about to rape him?
Life is tough, but it's tougher when you're stupid.
John Wayne
NRA Lifetime member
Locked

Return to “2015 Legislative Session”