Page 1 of 1

Police Shoot Man After Car Chase

Posted: Fri Aug 24, 2012 4:54 pm
by Kythas
I'm not sure, but it doesn't seem to me that the police had cause to shoot the guy when he got out of his car and started running.

What do you think?

http://foxnewsinsider.com/2012/08/24/mi ... -happened/

Re: Police Shoot Man After Car Chase

Posted: Fri Aug 24, 2012 5:01 pm
by ffemt300
Looks like they hit him at least once, because he didnt try to leave that brushy area after he bailed.

Re: Police Shoot Man After Car Chase

Posted: Fri Aug 24, 2012 6:59 pm
by PrideAndJoy54
He definitely was hit, bloody torso as they pulled his limp body from the brush. I imagine the argument for shooting him would be that he had already endangered the public and officers with his reckless driving and not knowing if he was armed they acted to protect other motorists. Not sure if that justifies killing him but then we don't know all the facts.

Re: Police Shoot Man After Car Chase

Posted: Fri Aug 24, 2012 7:03 pm
by The Annoyed Man
PrideAndJoy54 wrote:He definitely was hit, bloody torso as they pulled his limp body from the brush. I imagine the argument for shooting him would be that he had already endangered the public and officers with his reckless driving and not knowing if he was armed they acted to protect other motorists. Not sure if that justifies killing him but then we don't know all the facts.
He was fleeing from a home invasion he had just done. I am not even marginally upset they killed him. I only wish it had happened before he wrecked everybody's cars. If he had surrendered, he'd be alive. His death is 100% on him. So is any grief his family may experience.

Re: Police Shoot Man After Car Chase

Posted: Fri Aug 24, 2012 7:29 pm
by PrideAndJoy54
The Annoyed Man wrote:
PrideAndJoy54 wrote:He definitely was hit, bloody torso as they pulled his limp body from the brush. I imagine the argument for shooting him would be that he had already endangered the public and officers with his reckless driving and not knowing if he was armed they acted to protect other motorists. Not sure if that justifies killing him but then we don't know all the facts.
He was fleeing from a home invasion he had just done. I am not even marginally upset they killed him. I only wish it had happened before he wrecked everybody's cars. If he had surrendered, he'd be alive. His death is 100% on him. So is any grief his family may experience.
Now we know all the pertinent facts, thanks TAM. One last interesting thing, during the chase on the freeway I noticed the passenger side back window open and what looked like a bag of white substance dumped/tossed out. Assuming it was drugs, did these geniuses bring a bag of dope along to a home invasion or is that what they stole?

Re: Police Shoot Man After Car Chase

Posted: Fri Aug 24, 2012 8:49 pm
by The Annoyed Man
PrideAndJoy54 wrote:
The Annoyed Man wrote:
PrideAndJoy54 wrote:He definitely was hit, bloody torso as they pulled his limp body from the brush. I imagine the argument for shooting him would be that he had already endangered the public and officers with his reckless driving and not knowing if he was armed they acted to protect other motorists. Not sure if that justifies killing him but then we don't know all the facts.
He was fleeing from a home invasion he had just done. I am not even marginally upset they killed him. I only wish it had happened before he wrecked everybody's cars. If he had surrendered, he'd be alive. His death is 100% on him. So is any grief his family may experience.
Now we know all the pertinent facts, thanks TAM. One last interesting thing, during the chase on the freeway I noticed the passenger side back window open and what looked like a bag of white substance dumped/tossed out. Assuming it was drugs, did these geniuses bring a bag of dope along to a home invasion or is that what they stole?
I don't know. I was watching the news coverage, and they said that he was fleeing from the scene of a home invasion, but there were no more details at that time.

Re: Police Shoot Man After Car Chase

Posted: Sat Aug 25, 2012 9:06 am
by Kythas
As I watched the video again, one of the police cars appears to have a bullet hole in the windshield, which means someone from the vehicle must have fired upon the police at some point.

So, the officer would have had reasonable suspicion that the suspect was armed as he fled, which would have made the shooting justified.

Re: Police Shoot Man After Car Chase

Posted: Sat Aug 25, 2012 10:06 pm
by gigag04
The cops always be shootin folks for no reason

Re: Police Shoot Man After Car Chase

Posted: Sun Aug 26, 2012 12:18 am
by ffemt300
"rlol"
gigag04 wrote:The cops always be shootin folks for no reason

Re: Police Shoot Man After Car Chase

Posted: Sun Aug 26, 2012 9:43 am
by PrideAndJoy54
gigag04 wrote:The cops always be shootin folks for no reason
Dat buhdiculous!

Re: Police Shoot Man After Car Chase

Posted: Sun Aug 26, 2012 11:30 am
by gringo pistolero
gigag04 wrote:The cops always be shootin folks for no reason
I thought that was mostly in LA and NYC.

Re: Police Shoot Man After Car Chase

Posted: Sun Aug 26, 2012 11:53 am
by MoJo
gringo pistolero wrote:
gigag04 wrote:The cops always be shootin folks for no reason
I thought that was mostly in LA and NYC.
An' Miami, Chicago, New Orleans, Boston, Houston, Detroit, and every other Podunk town in America - - - the cops shoot perfectly innocent offenders all the time. Read the papers or watch the news they are all Eagle Scouts trying to sing in the choir at church while turning their lives around.