cb1000rider wrote:Yea, there definitely seems to be two camps on this:mojo84 wrote:Just because we have a gun doesn't mean that its use is required. If I did pull my gun, shooting would not be my first option. I would only fire the gun in the event I couldn't stop the assault or they turned on me. My primary goal would be to stop the assault of the old lady and the purse would be secondary.
1) Pull -> Fire
2) Pull -> Evaluate -> Fire
Please note that when I stated that Texas law justifies walking up and shooting someone in the act of committing robbery, I am not stating that is necessarily the best course of action or the only course of action.cb1000rider wrote:... I should say that when drawing, there appears to be two camps..
I am simply observing that, before one even draws your handgun, it is preferable to know what level of force is justified and what level of force is presumed justified. That gives you firmly grounded legal choices. One simply must be well-grounded in exactly what the statutes do and do not say.
I see many comments in this thread where is at least appears that various authors are not fully aware of where the legal lines are drawn and what standards must be met to justify the use of deadly force. A CHL is placing their freedom at risk if they are walking around carrying a handgun and have a fuzzy knowledge of Texas Penal Code Chapter 9.
Back to your observation, if these are my three choices:
0) Be a good witness.
1) Pull -> Fire
2) Pull -> Evaluate -> Fire
Then, should a person choose options 1 or 2, they better know before drawing where they stand.