Well, that's not so bad.dcphoto wrote:The range fee covers everything except the long range range. However, if you pay for the long range range, you are entitled to shoot everything else. The only thing that would cost extra is trap/skeet, which you would still have to pay per round.
We obviously see things differently as far as the value of safety training for each member as opposed to a RSO staff policing whoever comes by.dcphoto wrote:A 4 hour safety class doesn't make the range any safer. It is still up to individuals to put safety into practice, and without RSOs to enforce those safety rules, ARC is just as dangerous as any public range. No matter how you slice it, you are still occupying a range with persons of unknown experience and attitudes towards safety. Further, there are always threads on the forum discussing range violations. Those violations have lead to an extensive list of rules about what you can, and cannot, do on each particular range.
I'm definitely not saying there is a safety problem there, just that it isn't any safer than any other quality range. The suggestion that it is safer because the members take a class, or have a CHL, is misleading at best. In fact, some of the least safe persons I've ever shot with were in my CHL class, despite multiple safety briefings by the instructors.
Please don't misunderstand, I'm not trying to say ARC is a bad or unsafe range. I'm just trying to say that the "safety factor" provided by a range orientation only gives the appearance of safety. Actual safety would require RSOs on the range to enforce safety rules.
RSO's can't be everywhere, personal responsibility is the issue. To me, it's no different from relying on personal protection vs expecting the police to always protect you.
You mentioned the ARC forum. That's another plus for them, communication between members and with staff and board members. It doesn't take much effort to get answers , and for members get to be involved, if they want, by going to meetings.
I'm not trying to play up ARC, in all my posts I am trying to say that everyone has a different viewpoint on what is an ideal range. No one knows anything about this new range, I'm trying to bring some of these things to light. This new place will do well, I'd like to try it; if I get a chance, I will. Maybe it will be exactly what I'm looking for. I still need to try that one down by Lockhart too. I think I've tried everyplace else.