I have a M&P 9C that i shot tonight for the 1st time in awhile. Took a couple of clips to get reaquainted with the feel.
I also have a sig p238 (nice shooter). I'm starting to think this is enough for pocket carry.
I'd have to rent one of the new micro 9's to see what they are really like. Collatoral damage issues scare me.
Search found 5 matches
- Fri Mar 11, 2011 11:20 pm
- Forum: General Gun, Shooting & Equipment Discussion
- Topic: Ruger LC9
- Replies: 25
- Views: 4533
- Thu Mar 10, 2011 7:11 pm
- Forum: General Gun, Shooting & Equipment Discussion
- Topic: Ruger LC9
- Replies: 25
- Views: 4533
Re: Ruger LC9
Academy is going to charge $355.00 once they start stocking it.
They have it in the system and are waiting for inventory.
They have it in the system and are waiting for inventory.
- Sun Mar 06, 2011 11:03 am
- Forum: General Gun, Shooting & Equipment Discussion
- Topic: Ruger LC9
- Replies: 25
- Views: 4533
Re: Ruger LC9
interesting comment about being all over the place with it.reelman wrote:I picked mine up on Friday, maybe MrvMax is my FFL so it is my gun he is referencing? I went up to the hunting lease on Saturday to fill feeders and setup a corn bag as a target. The gun doesn't recoil as much as I thought. I only put 20 rounds through it. My shots were all over the place. I definitely need time at the range to figure the sights in and see how it shoots. I am going to try to head to Arms Room later today and put a lot more through it.
Asthey make large caliber hand guns in smaller platforms having accuracy control might become harder to achieve therefore putting the user at greater rick of collateral damage issues.
Looking foward to a range report.
- Sat Mar 05, 2011 10:57 pm
- Forum: General Gun, Shooting & Equipment Discussion
- Topic: Ruger LC9
- Replies: 25
- Views: 4533
Re: Ruger LC9
Thanks for the input.Salty1 wrote:If you did not like the LC9 I would doubt you will like the P290. After handeling the 290 at the Shot Show I cancelled my order, it is not even close to what I expected from Sig. When they actually hit the market check them both out, the Sig will be somewhere in the upper $500 range, the LC9 in the $350 range, some lower some higher. The highlight of the new smaller 9's was the Kimber, I would expect some initial issue with them until the problems get ironed out by the manufacturers. My wife will be getting one of the kimbers, I may take one as well purely due to the way they fit our hands, next in line will be the LC9, I like that handgun very much, just for the record I do not care for the LCP at all, there is no comparison between the 2 Rugers as to the way they fit our hands..... I believe that these smaller 9's will take over the 380 handgun market...
On paper the sig has a wider grip and i kind of like that idea but $200.00 more than the lc9 wow.
I think KAHR has a new one coming out as well.
Wish Walther PPK would come out in a 9.
I have a Sig p238(eventual daughter purse gun) and a Kimber Pro Carry II 9mm. Might just get me another p238.
I've seen the Solo and i for now have a hard time with the price for a pocket carry. I can get a full size STI Spartan 9mm for about the same price.
I agree that smaller 9's is going to make a run.
- Sat Mar 05, 2011 8:45 pm
- Forum: General Gun, Shooting & Equipment Discussion
- Topic: Ruger LC9
- Replies: 25
- Views: 4533
Re: Ruger LC9
Saw a LC9 at the Pasadena gun show today. I think they wanted around $325.00 for it. It was ajcsportsshop.
I didn't like the way it felt in my hand.
Will have to wait for the new sig p290 now.
I did pick up a M&P 15-22 for $399.00. That's $150.00 to $200.00 cheaper than I've been seeing it around the Clear Lake Area.
I didn't like the way it felt in my hand.
Will have to wait for the new sig p290 now.
I did pick up a M&P 15-22 for $399.00. That's $150.00 to $200.00 cheaper than I've been seeing it around the Clear Lake Area.